MIB-1 Index-Stratified Assessment of Dual-Tracer PET/CT with (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (18)F-FDG and Multimodality Anatomic Imaging in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Primary in a PRRT Workup Setting.
Our aim was to comparatively assess dual-tracer PET/CT (68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG) and multimodality anatomic imaging in studying metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of unknown primary (CUP-NETs) scheduled for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for divergence of tracer uptake on dual-tracer PET/CT, detection of primary, and overall lesion detection vis-a-vis tumor proliferation index (MIB-1/Ki-67). Methods: Fifty-one patients with CUP-NETs (25 men, 26 women; age, 22-74 y), histopathologically proven and thoroughly investigated with conventional imaging modalities (ultrasonography, CT/contrast-enhanced CT, MRI, and endoscopic ultrasound, wherever applicable), were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were primarily referred for deciding on feasibility of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (except 2 patients), and all had undergone 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT as part of pretreatment workup. The sites of metastases included liver, lung/mediastinum, skeleton, abdominal nodes, and other soft-tissue sites. Patients were divided into 5 groups on the basis of MIB-1/Ki-67 index on a 5-point scale: group I (1%-5%) (n = 35), group II (6%-10%) (n = 8), group III (11%-15%) (n = 4), group IV (16%-20%) (n = 2), and group V (>20%) (n = 2). Semiquantitative analysis of tracer uptake was undertaken by SUVmax of metastatic lesions and the primary (when detected). The SUVmax values were studied over increasing MIB-1/Ki-67 index. The detection sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTATATE for primary and metastatic lesions was assessed and compared with other imaging modalities including 18F-FDG PET/CT. Results: Unknown primary was detected on 68Ga-DOTATATE in 31 of 51 patients, resulting in sensitivity of 60.78% whereas overall lesion detection sensitivity was 96.87%. The overall lesion detection sensitivities (individual groupwise from group I to group V) were 97.75%, 87.5%, 100%, 100%, and 66.67%, respectively. As MIB-1/Ki-67 index increased, 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake decreased in metastatic and primary lesions (mean SUVmax, 43.5 and 22.68 g/dL in group I to 22.54 and 16.83 g/dL in group V, respectively), whereas 18F-FDG uptake showed a gradual rise (mean SUVmax, 3.66 and 2.86 g/dL in group I to 7.53 and 9.58 g/dL in group V, respectively). There was a corresponding decrease in the 68Ga-DOTATATE-to-18F-FDG uptake ratio with increasing MIB-1/Ki-67 index (from 11.89 in group I to 2.99 in group V). Conclusion: In CUP-NETs, the pattern of uptake on dual-tracer PET (68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG) correlates well with tumor proliferation index with a few outliers; combined dual-tracer PET/CT with MIB-1/Ki-67 index would aid in better whole-body assessment of tumor biology in CUP-NETs.
Sampathirao N
，Basu S
《-》
Discordance Between Histopathologic Grading and Dual-Tracer PET/CT Findings in Metastatic NETs and Outcome of (177)Lu-DOTATATE PRRT: Does In Vivo Molecular PET Perform Better from the Viewpoint of Prediction of Tumor Biology?
Discordance between histopathologic grading and dual-tracer PET/CT (68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG) findings in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), though not typical, can be encountered in real-world scenarios. The aim of this study was to assess patients with discordance between World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 grade-predicted molecular PET/CT imaging and the actual dual-tracer PET/CT findings (by exploring their histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular imaging characteristics), with a view toward identifying the prognostic determinants affecting outcome in a peptide receptor radionuclide therapy setup. Methods: Thirty-six patients with histopathologically proven inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic NETs, referred for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, were included in this study. The cohort was divided into 2 broad population groups: those with discordance (between WHO 2017 grade-predicted molecular imaging and the dual-tracer PET/CT findings) and control (showing both 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake). The cohort was divided on the basis of dual-tracer PET/CT into 3 groups: metabolically inactive (non-18F-FDG-avid) and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-expressing tumors, metabolically active (18F-FDG-avid) and non-68Ga-DOTATATE-concentrating (non-SSTR-expressing) tumors, and matched imaging characteristics with the WHO 2017 grading system (showing both 18F-FDG- and 68Ga-DOTATATE-concentrating disease) for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze categoric data; multivariate analysis was used to assess the correlation between different variables with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis to calculate median survival and to analyze survival on the basis of WHO 2017 grading and dual-tracer PET. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine predictors of survival (OS and PFS). Results: Of the 36-patient cohort, 24 (66.7%) showed discordance and 12 (33.3%) were in the control group. Among those showing discordance: 14 (38.9%) had metabolically inactive and SSTR-expressing disease and the remaining 10 (27.8%) had 18F-FDG-concentrating and non-SSTR-expressing disease. Among those in the control group, 12 (33.3%) had intermediate-grade NETs and showed matched (68Ga-DOTATATE- and 18F-FDG-concentrating lesions) disease. Multivariate analysis in patients with discordant findings showed a significant correlation of dual-tracer PET with OS, whereas no significant correlation could be established between WHO grade and OS in the discordant subgroups. No significant correlation could be appreciated between PFS and either dual-tracer PET or WHO grading. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox analysis showed dual-tracer PET/CT imaging to be a significant prognostic determinant and predictor of outcome, respectively. Conclusion: In NET patients with discordance between the 2 parameters, dual-tracer PET/CT with 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE performed better than WHO grading, differentiation status, and immunohistochemistry in prognosticating and predicting outcome.
Adnan A
，Basu S
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
