Sensitivity of mass spectrometry analysis depends on the shape of the filtration unit used for filter aided sample preparation (FASP).

Efficient protein solubilization using detergents is required for in-depth proteome analysis, but successful LC-MS/MS analysis greatly depends on proper detergents removal. A commonly used sample processing method is the filter-aided sample preparation (FASP), which allows protein digestion and detergent removal on the same filtration device. Many optimizations of the FASP protocol have been published, but there is no information on the influence of the filtration unit typology on the detergents removal. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of conic and flat bottom filtration units in terms of number of proteins identified by LC-MS/MS. We have analyzed 1, 10 and 100 μg of total cell lysate prepared using lysis buffer with different SDS concentrations. We compared the FASP protocol using conic and flat bottom filtration units to ethanol precipitation method. Subsequently, we applied our most performant protocol to single murine pancreatic islet, and identified up to 2463 protein using FASP versus 1169 proteins using ethanol precipitation. We conclude that FASP performance depends strongly on the filter shape: flat bottom devices are better suited for low-protein samples, as they allow better SDS removal leading to the identification of greater number of proteins.

Lipecka J ，Chhuon C ，Bourderioux M ，Bessard MA ，van Endert P ，Edelman A ，Guerrera IC ... -  《-》

Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) for Improved Proteome Analysis of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells.

Coleman O ，Henry M ，Clynes M ，Meleady P ... -  《-》

Comparison of ultrafiltration units for proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analysis by the filter-aided sample preparation method.

The filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method allows gel-free processing of biological samples solubilized with detergents for proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry. In FASP detergents are removed by ultrafiltration, and after protein digestion peptides are separated from undigested material. Here we compare the effectiveness of different filtration devices for analysis of proteomes and glycoproteomes. We show that Microcon and Vivacon filtration units with nominal molecular weight cutoffs of 30,000 and 50,000 (30 and 50k, respectively) are equally suitable for FASP, whereas Microcon 30k units are most appropriate for mapping of N-glycosylation sites. The use of filters with these relatively large cutoffs facilitates depletion of detergents.

Wiśniewski JR ，Zielinska DF ，Mann M 《-》

Modified filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method increases peptide and protein identifications for shotgun proteomics.

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based protein identification depends mainly on protein extraction and digestion. Although sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) can preclude enzymatic digestion and interfere with MS analysis, it is still the most widely used surfactant in these steps. To overcome these disadvantages, a SDS-compatible proteomic technique for SDS removal prior to MS-based analyses was developed, namely filter-aided sample preparation (FASP). Herein, based on the effectiveness of sodium deoxycholate and a detergent removal spin column, we developed a modified FASP (mFASP) method and compared its overall performance, total number of peptides and proteins identified for shotgun proteomic experiments with that of the FASP method. Identification of 4570 ± 392 and 9139 ± 317 peptides and description of 862 ± 46 and 1377 ± 33 protein groups with two or more peptides from the ovarian cancer cell line A2780 was accomplished by FASP and mFASP methods, respectively. The mFASP method (21.2 ± 0.2%) had higher average peptide to protein coverage than FASP method (13.2 ± 0.5%). More hydrophobic peptides were identified by mFASP than by FASP, as indicated by the GRAVY score distribution. The reported method enables reliable and efficient identification of proteins and peptides in whole-cell extracts containing SDS. The new approach allows for higher throughput (the simultaneous identification of more proteins), a more comprehensive investigation of proteins, and potentially the discovery of new biomarkers. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ni MW ，Wang L ，Chen W ，Mou HZ ，Zhou J ，Zheng ZG ... -  《-》

Combination of FASP and StageTip-based fractionation allows in-depth analysis of the hippocampal membrane proteome.

Wiśniewski JR ，Zougman A ，Mann M 《-》