Multiple arterial grafts improve survival with coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary interventions.

To compare long-term survival with multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (MultArt) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD). We reviewed 12,615 patients with MVD with isolated primary CABG or PCI from 1993 to 2009. Patients with CABG (n = 6667) were grouped according to the number of arterial grafts into left internal thoracic artery (LITA)/saphenous vein (SV) (n = 5712) or MultArt (n = 955); patients with PCI (n = 5948) were grouped into balloon angioplasty (BA) (n = 1020), drug-eluting stent (DES) (n = 1686), and bare metal stent (BMS) (n = 3242). Unadjusted long-term survival was lower for CABG than PCI (15-year survival, 34% vs 46%; P < .001); however, in patients with MultArt, survival was greater than LITA/SV, BA, BMS (15-year survival, 65% vs 31%, 47%, 45%, respectively; P < .001), and DES (8-year survival, 87% vs 70%; P < .001). In matched analyses, 15-year survival of MultArt was higher than BA (66% vs 57%; P = .002), LITA/SV (64% vs 56%; P = .02), and BMS (5-year survival 94% vs 90%; P = .01), and similar to DES at 8 years. In multivariate analysis, compared with MultArt, LITA/SV had worse survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.52; P = .003). BMS (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.94; P < .001) and DES (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88; P < .001) had improved survival versus LITA/SV but not versus MultArt (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.94-1.34; P = .21, and HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.79-1.21; P = .83, respectively). Secondary analyses for treatment crossover indicated lower survival for LITA/SV versus MultArt and PCI. In patients with MVD undergoing primary revascularization, MultArt increased survival benefit versus LITA/SV compared with PCI. Use of MultArt must increase.

Locker C ，Schaff HV ，Daly RC ，Dearani JA ，Bell MR ，Frye RL ，Greason KL ，Stulak JM ，Joyce LD ，Pochettino A ，Li Z ，Lennon RJ ，Lerman A ... -  《-》

Multiarterial grafts improve the rate of early major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: analysis of 12 615 patients with multivessel disease.

Our goal was to compare the rates of in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including death, stroke, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing multiarterial (MultArt) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with the left internal mammary artery/saphenous vein (LIMA/SV) CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). From 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2009, 12 615 consecutive patients underwent isolated primary CABG (n = 6667) with LIMA/SV (n = 5712) or MultArt (n = 955) or were treated by PCI (n = 5948) with balloon angioplasty (n = 1020), bare metal stent (n = 3242), and drug-eluting stent (n = 1686). We excluded patients with acute myocardial infarction. We matched the CABG group with the 3 PCI subgroups, and the PCI group with the 2 CABG subgroups. Multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the impact of CABG versus PCI and their subgroups on early MACCE. Unadjusted early MACCE were lower for MultArt (1.5%) than for LIMA/SV (4.5%, P < 0.001) and PCI (8.5%, P < 0.001). In matched analysis, CABG had lower early MACCE versus balloon angioplasty (4.7% vs 13.2%, P < 0.001), bare metal stent (4.3% vs 8.3%, P < 0.001), and drug-eluting stent (2.9% vs 5.5%, P = 0.008), as well as LIMA/SV versus PCI (4.6% vs 9.2%, P < 0.001) and MultArt versus PCI (1.8% vs 7.8%, P < 0.001). Stroke rate was similar in MultArt versus PCI (0.8% vs 0.3%, P = 0.18) but higher with LIMA/SV versus PCI (2.3% vs 0.4%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, PCI (odds ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval: 2.62-7.83; P < 0.001) and LIMA/SV (odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-3.53; P < 0.011) were strong predictors of early MACCE compared with MultArt. MultArt confers the lowest rate of early MACCE.

Locker C ，Schaff HV ，Daly RC ，Bell MR ，Frye RL ，Stulak JM ，Said SM ，Dearani JA ，Joyce LD ，Greason KL ，Pochettino A ，Li Z ，Lennon RJ ，Lerman A ... -  《-》

Multiple arterial grafting confers survival advantage compared to percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease: A propensity score adjusted analysis.

The best revascularisation strategy for multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) is still controversial. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) utilising drug eluting stents (DES) has emerged as an acceptable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the last decade. However, multiple arterial grafting (MAG) is superior revascularisation strategy compared with conventional CABG utilising single internal mammary artery and currently there is a paucity of comparison of DES and MAG. We aimed to investigate whether MAG offers advantage over DES-PCI in MVD. A total of 6126 patients with MVD (≥ 2 vessel) underwent CABG (n = 4652) or PCI (n = 1474) at a single institution. MAG was performed in 1372 CABG cases and DES were implanted in 1222 PCI cases. Propensity score adjusted analysis was performed to investigate the potential survival advantage of MAG over PCI. Mean follow-up was 4.9 years. Risk for late death was comparable after DES-PCI and conventional CABG (HR 1.11; 95%CI 0.9 to 1.33; P = 0.25). However, DES-PCI was associated with an increased risk for late death compared to MAG (HR 1.53; 95%CI 1.08 to 2.91; P = 0.02). DES-PCI was also associated with a 3.51 fold increased risk for repeat revascularisation over MAG (95%CI 2.60 to 4.75; P < 0.0001) and 2.66 fold increased risk for repeat revascularisation over conventional CABG (95%CI 2.11 to 3.36; P < 0.0001). MAG improved late survival and offered superior freedom from repeat revascularisation compared to DES-PCI. When feasible, MAG should be strongly recommended in patients with MVD.

Raja SG ，Benedetto U ，Ilsley CD ，Amrani M ，Harefield Cardiac Outcomes Research Group ... -  《-》

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.

The authors undertook a patient-level meta-analysis to compare long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in 3,280 patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). The relative efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI with DES for left main or multivessel CAD remain controversial. Data were pooled from the BEST (Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease), PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery vs. Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease), and SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trials. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The median follow-up was 60 months, and follow-up was completed for 96.2% of patients. The rate of primary outcome was significantly lower with CABG than with PCI (13.0% vs. 16.0%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69 to 1.00; p = 0.046). The difference was mainly driven by reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.64; p < 0.001). There was significant interaction between treatment effect and types of CAD, showing CABG to be superior compared with PCI with DES in patients with multivessel CAD (p = 0.001), but no between-group difference in those with left main CAD (p = 0.427). The rates for all-cause death and stroke were similar between the 2 groups. By contrast, the need for repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group compared with the PCI group. CABG, as compared with PCI with DES, reduced long-term rates of the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients with left main or multivessel CAD. The advantage of CABG over PCI with DES was particularly pronounced in those with multivessel CAD.

Lee CW ，Ahn JM ，Cavalcante R ，Sotomi Y ，Onuma Y ，Suwannasom P ，Tenekecioglu E ，Yun SC ，Park DW ，Kang SJ ，Lee SW ，Kim YH ，Park SW ，Serruys PW ，Park SJ ... -  《-》

CABG Versus PCI: Greater Benefit in Long-Term Outcomes With Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting.

Treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with traditional single-arterial coronary artery bypass graft (SA-CABG) has been associated with superior intermediate-term survival and reintervention compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using either bare-metal stents (BMS) or drug-eluting stents (DES). This study sought to investigate longer-term outcomes including the potential added advantage of multiarterial coronary artery bypass graft (MA-CABG). We studied 8,402 single-institution, primary revascularization, multivessel coronary artery disease patients: 2,207 BMS-PCI (age 66.6 ± 11.9 years); 2,381 DES-PCI (age 65.9 ± 11.7 years); 2,289 SA-CABG (age 69.3 ± 9.0 years); and 1,525 MA-CABG (age 58.3 ± 8.7 years). Patients with myocardial infarction within 24 h, shock, or left main stents were excluded. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to separately compare 9-year all-cause mortality and unplanned reintervention for BMS-PCI and DES-PCI to respective propensity-matched SA-CABG and MA-CABG cohorts. BMS-PCI was associated with worse survival than SA-CABG, especially from 0 to 7 years (p = 0.015) and to a greater extent than MA-CABG was (9-year follow-up: 76.3% vs. 86.9%; p < 0.001). The surgery-to-BMS-PCI hazard ratios (HR) were as follows: versus SA-CABG, HR: 0.87; and versus MA-CABG, HR: 0.38. DES-PCI showed similar survival to SA-CABG except for a modest 0 to 3 years surgery advantage (HR: 1.06; p = 0.615). Compared with MA-CABG, DES-PCI exhibited worse survival at 5 (86.3% vs. 95.6%) and 9 (82.8% vs. 89.8%) years (HR: 0.45; p <0.001). Reintervention was substantially worse with PCI for all comparisons (all p <0.001). Multiarterial surgical revascularization, compared with either BMS-PCI or DES-PCI, resulted in substantially enhanced death and reintervention-free survival. Accordingly, MA-CABG represents the optimal therapy for multivessel coronary artery disease and should be enthusiastically adopted by multidisciplinary heart teams as the best evidence-based therapy.

Habib RH ，Dimitrova KR ，Badour SA ，Yammine MB ，El-Hage-Sleiman AK ，Hoffman DM ，Geller CM ，Schwann TA ，Tranbaugh RF ... -  《-》