Expression and prognostic roles of PIK3CA, JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma.

As a special subtype of gastric carcinoma, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinoma (EBVaGC) has distinct clinicopathological features. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network revealed that EBVaGC also has distinct molecular features: PIK3CA mutations, DNA hypermethylation, and JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2 amplification. Here, we evaluated PIK3CA, JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2 expression in 59 EBVaGC and 796 EBV-negative gastric carcinoma (EBVnGC) cases using immunohistochemistry and found that PIK3CA, JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2 were highly expressed in 75.9% and 48.8% (P<.001), 81.8% and 71.1% (P=.091), 92.5% and 84.8% (P=.132), and 98.1% and 89.7% (P=.049) of the EBVaGC and EBVnGC cases, respectively. However, the expression of PIK3CA, JAK2, PD-L1, or PD-L2 was not significantly associated with clinicopathological features or patient outcomes in EBVaGC. In contrast, in EBVnGC, high PIK3CA expression was significantly associated with indolent clinicopathological features and independently predicted better 5-year overall survival (57.8% versus 33.4%, P<.001). Our study indicated that the protein expression of the 4 characteristic molecules of EBVaGC was basically consistent with their genetic alterations, making them potential characteristic protein biomarkers and therapeutic targets of EBVaGC. The favorable impact of PIK3CA overexpression on survival found in this study gives us new insight into the clinical significance of PIK3CA in EBVnGC.

Dong M ，Wang HY ，Zhao XX ，Chen JN ，Zhang YW ，Huang Y ，Xue L ，Li HG ，Du H ，Wu XY ，Shao CK ... -  《-》

Clinical significance of spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia and intestinal metaplasia in Epstein-Barr virus-associated and Epstein-Barr virus-negative gastric cancer.

Spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia (SPEM) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) have been recognized as neoplastic precursors in gastric carcinogenesis. We explored the relationship between SPEM and IM in Epstein-Barr virus-associated (EBVaGC) and Epstein-Barr virus-negative (EBVnGC) gastric cancer. Sixty-four EBVaGC and one hundred and fifty-four EBVnGC patients were included. EBV positivity was identified using Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA-1 in situ hybridization. SPEM was subclassified into absent, early, and advanced SPEM. Acute and chronic inflammation was graded as absent, mild, moderate, and marked. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to analyze the correlation between SPEM, IM, and inflammation. Our study revealed that SPEM was detected in 87.5% EBVaGC and 85.1% EBVnGC patients. Distribution of patients according to the SPEM classification was significantly different between EBVaGC and EBVnGC groups (P=.038). IM was observed less frequently in EBVaGC when compared with EBVnGC patients (P<.001). No difference was observed between EBVaGC and EBVnGC in the levels of acute and chronic inflammation. A positive correlation between IM and SPEM status was observed in both EBVaGC and EBVnGC patients. Furthermore, advanced SPEM was an independent influential factor to IM in EBVnGC (P=.013). In conclusion, SPEM was associated with both EBVaGC and EBVnGC more frequently than IM. Moreover, advanced SPEM had a stronger association with IM than early SPEM in EBVnGC. These results suggest that identification of SPEM should be used as a high-risk indicator for detecting early gastric carcinoma, and should be brought to the attention of pathologists and clinicians.

Zhang Y ，Chen JN ，Dong M ，Zhang ZG ，Zhang YW ，Wu JY ，Du H ，Li HG ，Huang Y ，Shao CK ... -  《-》

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC). At present, the clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of EBV infection and the potential clinical benefits of immune checkpoint blockade in GC remain to be clarified. Hence, this study was designed to analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics of GC patients with varying EBV infection states and compare their overall survival (OS). A retrospective study was performed on 1031 consecutive GC patients who underwent gastrectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from February 2018 to November 2022. EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization (ISH) was used for EBV assessment, and immunohistochemical staining was used for evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and Ki67 expression. EBVaGC was defined as tumors with EBV positivity. In addition, EBV-negative GC (EBVnGC) patients were matched with EBVaGC patients based on seven clinicopathological parameters (age, gender, anatomic subsite, tumor size, Lauren classification, degree of differentiation, and tumor-node-metastasis [TNM] stage). The correlations of clinical features with HER2, PD-L1, and Ki67 expression were evaluated statistically. The survival of patients was assessed through medical records, telephone, or WeChat communication, and prognostic analysis was performed using the logrank test as well as univariable and multivariable regression analysis. Out of 1031 GC patients tested, 35 (3.4%) were diagnosed with EBVaGC. Notably, the EBVaGC group exhibited a distinct predominance of males and younger patients, significantly higher Ki67 and PD-L1 expression levels, and a lower prevalence of pericancerous nerve invasion than the EBVnGC group (P < 0.01). In the 35 EBVaGC cases, Ki67 expression was negatively correlated with age (P < 0.05), suggesting that a younger onset age was associated with higher Ki67 expression. In addition, PD-L1 expression was correlated with the degree of differentiation, T-stage, and clinical stage of the patient. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was elevated in tumors with lower differentiation or at later stages (P < 0.05). Using univariate analysis, Ki67, PD-L1, and clinical stage were identified as significant factors influencing the overall survival (OS) of EBVaGC patients (P < 0.05). Moreover, multivariate survival analysis revealed that clinical stage and Ki67 expression were independent risk factors for the OS of the patients (P < 0.05), and the three-year OS rate of EBVaGC patients was 64.2%. EBV-ISH is a practical and valuable method to identify EBVaGC. Owing to its unique etiological, pathological, and clinical characteristics, patients with EBVaGC might benefit from immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

Li LL ，Yu AY ，Zhu M ，Ma LY ，Cao MH ，Liu WL ，Qin XB ，Gao C ，Han ZX ，Wang HM ... -  《-》

Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer: A distinct subtype.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a common malignant tumor associated with EBV infection. The molecular classification of gastric carcinoma indicates that EBVaGC is a distinct subtype in terms of oncogenesis and molecular features. Viral proteins, Bam-HI-A rightward transcripts (BART) miRNAs, and Bam-HI A rightward frame 1 (BARF1) promote oncogenesis after EBV infection via the induction of methylation, regulation of host gene expression, and malignant transformation. Together with abnormal mutations and amplification of the host genome as driving factors, interactions between the EBV genome and host genome accelerate carcinogenesis. The molecular profile of EBVaGC is that of EBV driving DNA hypermethylation, frequent phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations, and the overexpression of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and PD-L2. Clinically, the frequency of lymph node metastasis is lower, and the prognosis is better for EBVaGC than EBV-negative gastric cancer (EBVnGC). Pathologically, EBVaGC is a gastric adenocarcinoma with lymphoid stroma. This review interprets how the EBV genome is involved in the oncogenesis of gastric cancer and describes the molecular and clinicopathological features of EBVaGC.

Yang J ，Liu Z ，Zeng B ，Hu G ，Gan R ... -  《-》

Differential expression of HER2 and downstream proteins in prediction of advanced tumor phenotypes and overall survival of patients with Epstein-Barr virus-positive vs. negative gastric cancers.

This study evaluated the associations of HER2 protein, HER2 gene amplification, and positivity for p-AKT, p-ERK, and p-PLCγ proteins with clinicopathological status and overall survival (OS) of patients who had Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC; n = 58) or EBV-negative GC (EBVnGC; n = 329). Tissue samples were subjected to immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Results showed that EBVaGC less expressed HER2 and amplified HER2 gene. p-AKT (p =  0.035) and p-ERK (p =  0.001) were inhibited in EBVaGC than in EBVnGC, while p-PLCγ (p =  0.034) was upregulated. Among EBVaGC patients, p-ERK positivity was associated with Lauren classification (p = 0.023), and p-PLCγ positivity was inversely associated with TNM stage (p = 0.041) and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.041). In contrast, among EBVnGC patients, HER2 expression was associated with distant metastasis (p = 0.043) and p-AKT positivity was associated with intestinal subtype (p < 0.004), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.031), distant metastasis (p < 0.001), and elder age (>60y, p < 0.004). Overall analysis showed that EBVaGC patients presented better OS than EBVnGC patients (p = 0.044). Among EBVaGC patients, p-AKT positivity (p = 0.008) was associated with worse OS; as well as, HER2 high expression (p < 0.001), p-AKT positivity (p = 0.010), and p-PLCγ (p <  0.001) were associated with worse OS in EBVnGC patients. Multivariate analysis showed that distant metastasis (95% CI: 1.559 to 4.028, p <  0.001), HER2 high expression (95% CI: 1.058 to 2.454, p =  0.026), and p-PLCγ positivity (95% CI: 1.056 to 2.435, p = 0.027) were independent prognostic predictors of OS in EBVnGC patients. Our results indicated that p-AKT positive patients presented worse OS than p-AKT negative ones in EBVaGC, as well as, HER2, p-AKT, and p-PLCγ are prognostic biomarkers for OS in EBVnGC patients.

Zhang YW ，He D ，Tan C ，Dong M ，Zhou L ，Shao CK ... -  《-》