HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping triage in young women with borderline cytology or mild dyskaryosis: effect of age on genotype-specific risk of high-grade CIN.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) triage of borderline cytology or mild dyskaryosis is limited by the higher prevalence of HPV in women with these findings relative to those with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (≥CIN2). This is particularly relevant in young women in whom HPV prevalence is discernible. In a previous analysis of HPV triage and colposcopy outcomes in Northern Ireland, we revealed a substantial amount of prevalent high-grade disease in women below 30 years of age. We explored the role of genotyping for HPV16/HPV18 in this population by assessing the risk of high-grade lesions associated with these genotypes and the effect of age on type-specific risk.
Of the 866 women eligible for HPV triage, those who tested positive for HPV were referred to colposcopy. The relative risk of ≥CIN2 for HPV16, HPV18 and non-HPV16/18 high-risk genotype positivity was determined for cobas(®) HPV Test-positive results.
The relative risk of high-grade CIN was significantly greater in women infected with HPV16 and/or HPV18 compared with non-HPV16/18 infections, regardless of age (2.23 and 0.45, respectively). In women under 30 years of age, HPV16-associated risk of ≥CIN2 was significantly greater than that of HPV18 and the non-HPV16/18 genotypes (1.74 versus 1.03 and 0.58, respectively). In women aged ≥30 years, HPV18 infection presented the greatest risk of ≥CIN2 (3.03). The relative risk of ≥CIN2 associated with non-HPV16/18 genotypes was lower (range, 0.32-0.58) for both age groups.
This analysis demonstrates the value of genotyping for HPV16/HPV18 and age stratification to improve the specificity of HPV triage and to tailor management relative to the risk of high-grade CIN and cancer.
McKenna M
，McMenamin M
，McDowell A
《-》
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
The ATHENA study was designed to assess the performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping compared with liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening in a large US population aged 21 years and older. We did a subanalysis of this population to compare the screening performance of the cobas HPV test versus liquid-based cytology in women aged 25 years and older, and assess management strategies for HPV-positive women.
Women aged 25 years or older who were attending routine cervical screening were enrolled from 61 clinical centres in 23 US states. Cervical specimens were obtained for liquid-based cytology and HPV DNA testing with two first-generation assays (Amplicor HPV test and Linear Array HPV genotyping test) and the second-generation cobas HPV test (with individual HPV16 and HPV18 detection). Colposcopy and diagnostic biopsies were done on women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or worse cytology, those who tested positive with either first-generation HPV test, and a random sample of women who tested negative for HPV and cytology. All women not selected for colposcopy received their results and exited the study. Participants and colposcopists were masked to cytology and HPV test results until the colposcopy visit was completed. The primary endpoint for this substudy was histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or worse. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00709891; the study is in the follow-up phase, which is due to be completed in December, 2012.
From May 27, 2008, to Aug 27, 2009, 47,208 women were enrolled, of whom 41,955 met our eligibility criteria. Valid cobas HPV and liquid-based cytology test results were available for 40,901 women (97%), who were included in this analysis. Of these, 4275 women (10%) tested cobas HPV positive and 2617 (6%) had abnormal cytology. 431 women were diagnosed with CIN2 or worse and 274 with CIN3 or worse. In women who had colposcopy, the cobas HPV test was more sensitive than liquid-based cytology for detection of CIN3 or worse (252/274 [92·0%, 95% CI 88·1-94·6] vs 146/274 [53·3%, 95% CI 47·4-59·1]; difference 38·7%, 95% CI 31·9-45·5; p<0·0001). Addition of liquid-based cytology to HPV testing increased sensitivity for CIN3 or worse to 96·7% (265/274, 95% CI 93·9-98·3), but increased the number of screen positives by 35·2% (5783/40,901 vs 4275/40,901) compared with HPV testing alone. As a triage test to identify CIN3 or worse in HPV-positive women, detection of HPV16, HPV18, or both alone was equivalent to detection of ASC-US or worse alone in terms of sensitivity (150/252 [59·5%] vs 133/252 [52·8%]; p=0·11) and positive predictive value (PPV) (150/966 [15·5%] vs 133/940 [14·1%]; p=0·20). Among HPV-positive women, detection of HPV16, HPV18, or both or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse cytology had better sensitivity (182/252 [72·2%]; p<0·0001) and similar PPV (182/1314 [13·9%]; p=0·70) for detection of CIN3 or worse than ASC-US or worse cytology alone. Furthermore, detection of HPV16, HPV18, or both or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse cytology had higher sensitivity (165/252 [65·5%]; p=0·0011) and PPV (165/1013 [16·3%]; p=0·031) for detection of CIN3 or worse than ASC-US or worse cytology alone.
HPV testing with separate HPV16 and HPV18 detection could provide an alternative, more sensitive, and efficient strategy for cervical cancer screening than do methods based solely on cytology.
Roche Molecular Systems.
Castle PE
，Stoler MH
，Wright TC Jr
，Sharma A
，Wright TL
，Behrens CM
... -
《-》
Clinical relevance of partial HPV16/18 genotyping in stratifying HPV-positive women attending routine cervical cancer screening: a population-based cohort study.
To evaluate partial HPV16/18 genotyping as a possible biomarker to select women attending HPV-based cervical cancer screening at higher risk to be referred to colposcopy.
Population-based cohort study.
Organised cervical cancer screening programmes (Italy).
Women with high-risk HPV infection (period: 2015-2019).
We analysed the association between partial HPV16/18 genotyping, cytology triage and histologically confirmed diagnosis of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3+ ) lesions.
Detection rate (DR) and positive predictive value (PPV) for histologically confirmed CIN3+ (any episode in the 2 years after baseline); sensitivity for CIN3+ and number of colposcopies needed for lesion detection.
The study included 145 437 women screened with HPV testing by the clinically validated COBAS 4800 HPV assay (Roche). Overall, 9601 (6.6%) women were HPV+ at baseline; HPV16 and HPV18 were present in 1865 and 594 samples, respectively. The cumulative (baseline plus 1-year repeat) cytology positivity was 42.8% and high-grade cytology was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) among women with HPV16 infection at baseline (15.2%). The cumulative CIN3+ DR for women with HPV16, HPV18 and other HPV-type infections was 9.8%, 3.4% and 1.8%, respectively.
Partial HPV16 genotyping may play a role in triage, whereas HPV18 seems to behave much more similarly to the other HPV types and does not provide additional stratification. HPV16 genotyping combined with high-grade cytology can be envisaged as a triage biomarker in cervical screening to maximise CIN3+ detection while minimising colposcopy at baseline or 1-year repeat.
HPV16 genotyping combined with high-grade cytology can be used as triage biomarker for CIN3+ in HPV-positive women.
Gori S
，Battagello J
，Gustinucci D
，Campari C
，Zorzi M
，Frayle H
，Passamonti B
，Sartori G
，Bulletti S
，Fodero C
，Cesarini E
，Faggiano R
，Del Mistro A
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
