Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study.

To compare perinatal outcomes between elective induction of labour (eIOL) and expectant management in obese women. Retrospective cohort study. Deliveries in California in 2007. Term, singleton, vertex, nonanomalous deliveries among obese women (n = 74 725). Women who underwent eIOL at 37 weeks were compared with women who were expectantly managed at that gestational age. Similar comparisons were made at 38, 39, and 40 weeks. Results were stratified by parity. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were used for statistical comparison. Method of delivery, severe perineal lacerations, postpartum haemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, respiratory distress syndrome. The odds of caesarean delivery were lower among nulliparous women with eIOL at 37 weeks [odds ratio (OR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.90] and 39 weeks (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.95) compared to expectant management. Among multiparous women with a prior vaginal delivery, eIOL at 37 (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.64), 38 (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82), and 39 weeks (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.56-0.81) was associated with lower odds of caesarean. Additionally, eIOL at 38, 39, and 40 weeks was associated with lower odds of macrosomia. There were no differences in the odds of operative vaginal delivery, lacerations, brachial plexus injury or respiratory distress syndrome. In obese women, term eIOL may decrease the risk of caesarean delivery, particularly in multiparas, without increasing the risks of other adverse outcomes when compared with expectant management.

Lee VR ，Darney BG ，Snowden JM ，Main EK ，Gilbert W ，Chung J ，Caughey AB ... -  《-》

Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Darney BG ，Snowden JM ，Cheng YW ，Jacob L ，Nicholson JM ，Kaimal A ，Dublin S ，Getahun D ，Caughey AB ... -  《-》

Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.

A growing body of evidence supports improved or not worsened birth outcomes with nonmedically indicated induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation compared with expectant management. This evidence includes 2 recent randomized control trials. However, concern has been raised as to whether these studies are applicable to a broader US pregnant population. Our goal was to compare outcomes for electively induced births at ≥39 weeks gestation with those that were not electively induced. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using chart-abstracted data on births from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, at 21 hospitals in the Northwest United States. The study was restricted to singleton cephalic hospital births at 39+0-42+6 weeks gestation. Exclusions included previous cesarean birth, missing data for delivery type or gestational week at birth, antepartum stillbirth, cesarean birth without any attempt at vaginal birth, fetal anomaly, gestational diabetes mellitus, prepregnancy diabetes mellitus, and prepregnancy hypertension. The rate of cesarean birth for elective inductions at both 39 and 40 weeks gestation was compared with the rate in all other on-going pregnancies in the same gestational week. Maternal outcomes (operative vaginal birth, shoulder dystocia, 3rd- or 4th-degree perineal laceration, pregnancy-related hypertension, and postpartum hemorrhage) and newborn infant outcomes (macrosomia, 5-minute Apgar <7, resuscitation at delivery, intubation, respiratory complications, and neonatal intensive care unit admission) were also compared between elective inductions and on-going pregnancies at 39 and 40 weeks gestation. Logistic regression modeling was used to produce odds ratios for outcomes with adjustment for maternal age and body mass index. Results were stratified by parity and gestational week at birth. Duration of hospital stay (admission to delivery, delivery to discharge, and total stay) were compared between elective inductions and on-going pregnancies. A total of 55,694 births were included in the study cohort: 4002 elective inductions at ≥39+0 weeks gestation and 51,692 births at 39+0-42+6 weeks gestation that were not electively induced. In nulliparous women, elective induction at 39 weeks gestation was associated with a decreased likelihood of cesarean birth (14.7% vs 23.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.89) and an increased rate of operative vaginal birth (18.5% vs 10.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.54) compared with on-going pregnancies. In multiparous women, cesarean birth rates were similar in the elective inductions and on-going pregnancies. Elective induction at 39 weeks gestation was associated with a decreased likelihood of pregnancy-related hypertension in nulliparous (2.2% vs 7.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.68) and multiparous women (0.9% vs 3.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.38). Term elective induction was not associated with any statistically significant increase in adverse newborn infant outcomes. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation was associated with increased time from admission to delivery for both nulliparous (1.3 hours; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.3) and multiparous women (3.4 hours; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-3.6). Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation is associated with a decrease in cesarean birth in nulliparous women, decreased pregnancy-related hypertension in multiparous and nulliparous women, and increased time in labor and delivery. How to use this information remains the challenge.

Souter V ，Painter I ，Sitcov K ，Caughey AB ... -  《-》

Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.

Sinkey RG ，Blanchard CT ，Szychowski JM ，Ausbeck E ，Subramaniam A ，Neely CL ，Casey BM ，Tita AT ... -  《-》

Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.

Gibbs Pickens CM ，Kramer MR ，Howards PP ，Badell ML ，Caughey AB ，Hogue CJ ... -  《-》