Posterior augmented glenoid implants require less bone removal and generate lower stresses: a finite element analysis.

Glenoid retroversion can be corrected with standard glenoid implants after anterior-side asymmetric reaming or by using posterior augmented glenoid implants with built-in corrections. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 augmented glenoid designs with a standard glenoid design, measure the amount of bone removed, and compute the stresses generated in the cement and bone. Finite element models of 3 arthritic scapulae with varying severities of posterior glenoid wear were each implanted with 4 different implant configurations: standard glenoid implant in neutral alignment with asymmetric reaming, standard glenoid implant in retroversion, glenoid implant augmented with a posterior wedge in neutral alignment, and glenoid implant augmented with a posterior step in neutral alignment. The volume of cortical and cancellous bone removed and the percentage of implant back surface supported by cortical bone were measured. Stresses and strains in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone were computed. Asymmetric reaming for the standard implant in neutral version required the most bone removal, resulted in the lowest percentage of back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to the most bone volume. The wedged implant removed less bone, had a significantly greater percentage of the back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to significantly less bone volume. The wedged glenoid implants appear to have various advantages over the standard implant for the correction of retroversion. Basic Science Study; Computer Modeling.

Allred JJ ，Flores-Hernandez C ，Hoenecke HR Jr ，D'Lima DD ... -  《-》

Augmented wedge-shaped glenoid component for the correction of glenoid retroversion: a finite element analysis.

This study undertook a computational analysis of a wedged glenoid component for correction of retroverted glenoid arthritic deformity to determine whether a wedge-shaped glenoid component design with a built-in correction for version reduces excessive stresses in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone. Recommendations for correcting retroversion deformity are asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, or a glenoid component with posterior augmentation. Eccentric reaming has the disadvantages of removing normal bone, reducing structural support for the glenoid component, and increasing the risk of bone perforation by the fixation pegs. Bone grafting to correct retroverted deformity does not consistently generate successful results. Finite element models of 2 scapulae models representing a normal and an arthritic retroverted glenoid were implanted with a standard glenoid component (in retroversion or neutral alignment) or a wedged component. Glenohumeral forces representing in vivo loading were applied and stresses and strains computed in the bone, cement, and glenoid component. The retroverted glenoid components generated the highest compressive stresses and decreased cyclic fatigue life predictions for trabecular bone. Correction of retroversion by the wedged glenoid component significantly decreased stresses and predicted greater bone fatigue life. The cement volume estimated to survive 10 million cycles was the lowest for the retroverted components and the highest for neutrally implanted glenoid components and for wedged components. A wedged glenoid implant is a viable option to correct severe arthritic retroversion, reducing the need for eccentric reaming and the risk for implant failure.

Hermida JC ，Flores-Hernandez C ，Hoenecke HR ，D'Lima DD ... -  《-》

Posterior augmented glenoid designs preserve more bone in biconcave glenoids.

Total shoulder arthroplasty is recommended treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, which often results in excessive posterior wear. Two recent glenoid components with posterior augments have been designed to correct excessive posterior wear and retroversion. Our primary hypothesis was that posterior augmented glenoid designs require less bone removal than a standard glenoid design. Ten arthritic scapulae classified as Walch B2 glenoids were virtually implanted with standard, stepped, and wedged components. The volume of surgical bone removal, the maximum reaming depth, and the portion of the implant surface in contact with cancellous vs. cortical bone were calculated for each implant. The neoglenoid made up an average of 65% ± 12% of the glenoid width. Mean surgical bone volume removed was least for the wedged (2857 ± 1618 mm(3)) compared with the stepped (4307 ± 1485 mm(3); P < .001) and standard (5385 ± 2348 mm(3); P < .001) designs. Maximum bone depth removed for the wedged (4.2 ± 2.0 mm) was less than for the stepped (7.6 ± 1.2 mm; P < .001) and standard (9.9 ± 3.2 mm; P < .001). The mean percentage of the implant's back surface supported by cancellous bone was 18.2% for the standard, 8.8% for the stepped (P = .02), and 4.3% for the wedged (P = .01). Both augmented components corrected glenoid version to neutral and required less bone removal, required less reaming depth, and were supported by more cortical bone than in the standard implant. The least amount of bone removed was with the wedged design.

Kersten AD ，Flores-Hernandez C ，Hoenecke HR ，D'Lima DD ... -  《-》

Biomechanical comparison of 2 augmented glenoid designs: an integrated kinematic finite element analysis.

Augmented glenoid implants are available to help restore the biomechanics of the glenohumeral joint with excessive retroversion. It is imperative to understand their behavior to make a knowledgeable preoperative decision. Therefore, our goal was to identify an optimal augmented glenoid design based on finite element analysis (FEA) under maximum physiological loading. FEA models of 2 augmented glenoid designs-wedge and step-were created per the manufacturers' specifications and virtually implanted in a scapula model to correct 20° of retroversion. Simulation of shoulder abduction was performed using the FEA shoulder model. The glenohumeral force ratio, relative micromotion, and stress levels on the cement mantle, glenoid vault, and backside of the implants were compared between the 2 designs. The force ratio was 0.56 for the wedge design and 0.87 for the step design. Micromotion (combination of distraction, translation, and compression) was greater for the step design than the wedge design. Distraction measured 0.05 mm for the wedge design and 0.14 mm for the step component. Both implants showed a similar pattern for translation; however, compression was almost 3 times greater for the step component. Both implants showed high stress levels on the cement mantle. At the glenoid vault and on the implants, the stress levels were 1.65 MPa and 6.62 MPa, respectively, for the wedge design and 3.78 MPa and 13.25 MPa, respectively, for the step design. Implant design slightly affects joint stability; however, it plays a major role regarding long-term survival. Overall, the augmented wedge design provides better implant fixation and stress profiles with less micromotion.

Sabesan VJ ，Lima DJL ，Whaley JD ，Pathak V ，Zhang L ... -  《-》

Augmented glenoid implants in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: review of available implants and current literature.

Glenoid bone loss and retroversion increase the complexity of primary shoulder arthroplasty and affect the outcome. Although eccentric reaming, augmented glenoid implants, bone grafting, and reverse arthroplasty have been used to manage bone loss and retroversion, there is no consensus on treatment. Posteriorly augmented glenoid components can correct retroversion and avoid joint line medialization, which occurs with corrective reaming techniques. Full-wedged, half-wedged, and stepped polyethylene posteriorly augmented designs are currently available for use in the United States. The results of biomechanical and computer model studies support the use of augmented implants for the management of glenoid retroversion of greater than 15°. Currently, most clinical studies are retrospective case series. The short-term results of posteriorly augmented glenoid components are successful, with no clear evidence of the superiority of one design over another and unknown long-term survival rates.

Ghoraishian M ，Abboud JA ，Romeo AA ，Williams GR ，Namdari S ... -  《-》