Variations of treatment in selected proximal femur fractures among surgeons with different surgical experience--A survey at an international AO course.

Different modalities of treatment for hip fractures have been discussed in the literature; however, practice may vary between centres. A survey was conducted on participants at an international AO course to assess the current management of pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A2) and displaced, non-impacted, subcapital fractures (AO/OTA 31-B3) in a 35-year-old patient and an 85-year-old patient. Surgeons taking part in an international orthopaedic course were invited to participate in a survey and were divided into two groups: inexperienced (one-to-three years since qualification) and experienced (four or more years). A survey was conducted to assess the management modalities used for pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A2) and displaced, non-impacted, subcapital fractures (AO/OTA 31-B3) in a 35-year-old patient and an 85-year-old patient. Fifty-two surgeons participated: 18 were inexperienced and 34 were experienced. The method of operative fixation for the pertrochanteric fracture was gamma-nailing for 95% of the surgeons in the inexperienced group; in the experienced group, 56% opted for gamma-nailing and 38% for dynamic hip screw (DHS). For the displaced subcapital fracture in a 35-year-old, screw fixation was the dominant treatment option for both groups. For the displaced subcapital fracture in an 85-year-old, most of the surgeons in both groups preferred hemiarthroplasty: 59% in the inexperienced group chose cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty and 12% uncemented, whereas 56% of the experienced group suggested cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty and 25% uncemented. This survey shows that a variety of methods are used to treat femoral neck fractures. A prospective randomised trial has shown the DHS to be the implant of choice for pertrochanteric fractures; however, this was not considered an option in the inexperienced group of surgeons and was the treatment of choice in only 13 out of 34 experienced surgeons. There is a general consensus for femoral head-conserving surgery in young patients with displaced subcapital fractures. Replacement arthroplasty was considered in the 85-year-old with a subcapital fracture. In the inexperienced group, 10 of 17 surgeons would cement the prosthesis, as would 27 of 36 in the experienced group.

Sciacca S ，Lidder SS ，Grechenig C ，Grechenig S ，Staresinic M ，Bakota B ，Gänsslen A ... -  《-》

Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey.

Bhandari M ，Devereaux PJ ，Tornetta P 3rd ，Swiontkowski MF ，Berry DJ ，Haidukewych G ，Schemitsch EH ，Hanson BP ，Koval K ，Dirschl D ，Leece P ，Keel M ，Petrisor B ，Heetveld M ，Guyatt GH ... -  《JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME》

Management of young femoral neck fractures: is there a consensus?

Femoral neck fractures in young adults (ages <60) are high-energy injuries that are associated with major fracture healing complications such as avascular necrosis, nonunion, and significant shortening. Historically, evidence from small trials has suggested multiple cannulated screws were the optimal implant; however, newer studies and implant designs warrant reevaluation of screws as the gold standard among surgeons. In addition, controversies surrounding reduction technique and urgency of surgical fixation have been previously identified. We aimed to survey surgeon treatment preferences for these challenging fractures. A 17-item survey was developed and tested for validity and reliability prior to administration. The questionnaire characterised surgeon demographics, treatment preferences for displaced and undisplaced fractures, and controversies for future clinical trials. The target population consisted of surgeons from the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and attendees at an international fracture course. 540 surgeons completed the survey, exceeding our sample size requirement. There was a similar proportion of respondents from academic and community hospitals. Most surgeons (61%) treat 1-5 young adult femoral neck fractures per year. For undisplaced fractures, 78% of respondents prefer to use multiple cannulated screws. For displaced fractures, equal preference for multiple screws (46%) and the sliding hip screw (SHS, 49%) was reported. The majority of surgeons perform an open reduction in less than 25% of cases, and the time to fixation was typically between 8 and 24h. Multiple cannulated screws remain the preferred treatment for most surgeons treating undisplaced fractures; however, there is an equal divide in preference between multiple screws and the SHS for displaced fractures. This increased preference for the SHS contradicts previous survey and small trial data recommending multiple screws for all fracture patterns. The lack of surgeon consensus and the high rates of fracture complications associated with fixation of young femoral neck fractures supports the need for definitive clinical trials to optimise patient important outcomes.

Slobogean GP ，Sprague SA ，Scott T ，McKee M ，Bhandari M ... -  《-》

Fractures of the femoral neck: a review and personal statement.

Raaymakers EL 《Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca》

Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly Has a Low Conversion Rate.

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) has been a mainstay treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures for many years. The purpose of this study was to report the conversion rate of HA to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures and compare outcomes between implant constructs (bipolar vs unipolar), fixation options (cemented vs cementless stems), and age groups (<75 years vs ≥75 years). We retrospectively reviewed the results of a consecutive cohort of 686 patients who underwent HA for the treatment of femoral neck fractures at our institution between 1999 and 2013 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The overall component revision rate, including conversion to THA, revision HA, revision with open reduction internal fixation, and Girdlestone procedure, was 5.6% (39/686). Seventeen patients (2.5%) were converted from HA to THA at an average of 1.9 years after index procedure. A significantly lower conversion rate of 1.4% (7/499 patients) was found in the older patient cohort (≥75 years old) compared to 5.3% (11/187) in the younger cohort. The most common causes for conversion surgery to THA were acetabular wear (5 patients), aseptic loosening (4 patients), and periprosthetic fracture (3 patients). There was a significantly lower rate of periprosthetic fracture (0.4% vs 2.5%, P value .025) in the cemented implant group compared to the cementless group. We observed a higher rate of dislocations in the bipolar vs unipolar group (3.8% vs 1%, P value .02) and no other significant differences between these groups. We observed a low reoperation rate for this cohort of patients, relatively higher conversion rates for the younger population, fewer periprosthetic fractures with the use of cemented stems, and no advantage of bipolar over unipolar prostheses.

Grosso MJ ，Danoff JR ，Murtaugh TS ，Trofa DP ，Sawires AN ，Macaulay WB ... -  《-》