Recombinant Mal d 1 facilitates sublingual challenge tests of birch pollen-allergic patients with apple allergy.

It is still unclear whether allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) with birch pollen improves birch pollen-related food allergy. One reason for this may be the lack of standardized tests to assess clinical reactions to birch pollen-related foods, for example apple. We tested the applicability of recombinant (r) Mal d 1, the Bet v 1-homolog in apple, for oral challenge tests. Increasing concentrations of rMal d 1 in 0.9% NaCl were sublingually administered to 72 birch pollen-allergic patients with apple allergy. The dose of 1.6 μg induced oral allergy syndromes in 26.4%, 3.2 μg in 15.3%, 6.3 μg in 27.8%, 12.5 μg in 8.3%, 25 μg in 11.1%, and 50 μg in 4.2% of the patients. No severe reactions occurred. None of the patients reacted to 0.9% NaCl alone. Sublingual administration of 50 μg of rMal d 1 induced no reactions in three nonallergic individuals. Our approach allows straight forward, dose-defined sublingual challenge tests in a high number of birch pollen-allergic patients that inter alia can be applied to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of birch pollen AIT on birch pollen-related food allergy.

Kinaciyan T ，Nagl B ，Faustmann S ，Kopp S ，Wolkersdorfer M ，Bohle B ... -  《-》

Efficacy and safety of 4 months of sublingual immunotherapy with recombinant Mal d 1 and Bet v 1 in patients with birch pollen-related apple allergy.

Birch pollen-related apple allergy is among the most prevalent food allergies in adolescent/adult subjects and mainly results from sensitization to the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and subsequent cross-reaction with the apple protein Mal d 1. However, specific immunotherapy with birch pollen has inconsistent effects on apple allergy. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with 2 formulations containing either rMal d 1 or rBet v 1 on birch pollen-related apple allergy. Sixty participants with birch pollen-related apple allergy were randomized to daily sublingual application of placebo (n = 20) or 25 μg of rMal d 1 (n = 20) or rBet v 1 (n = 20) for 16 weeks. Adverse events were regularly recorded. Sublingual challenges with standardized doses of rMal d 1, skin prick tests with recombinant allergens, and measurements of allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 antibodies were performed before and after treatment. Both formulations caused comparable, mainly local adverse events. No systemic reactions occurred. Compared with the placebo and rBet v 1-treated groups, SLIT with rMal d 1 reduced rMal d 1-induced oral symptoms (P = .001 and P = .038) accompanied by longitudinally reduced rMal d 1-specific cutaneous reactions (P = .022) and enhanced IgG4/IgE ratios (P = .012). SLIT with rBet v 1 neither improved the clinical reactivity to rMal d 1 nor enhanced rMal d 1-specific IgG4/IgE ratios. Participants receiving placebo showed no allergen-specific changes. Sublingual treatment with a recombinant food allergen was safe and clinically effective, as determined by using standardized challenges. We present a promising approach for the effective treatment of birch pollen-related apple allergy.

Kinaciyan T ，Nagl B ，Faustmann S ，Frommlet F ，Kopp S ，Wolkersdorfer M ，Wöhrl S ，Bastl K ，Huber H ，Berger U ，Bohle B ... -  《-》

IgE-blocking antibodies following SLIT with recombinant Mal d 1 accord with improved apple allergy.

We recently reported that 16 weeks of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with recombinant (r) Mal d 1, but not rBet v 1, significantly improved birch pollen-related apple allergy. Allergen-specific IgE-blocking IgG antibodies have been associated with clinical efficacy. We compared the quantity, quality, and IgE-blocking bioactivity of SLIT-induced Mal d 1-specific IgG antibodies in both treatment groups. Pre- and post-SLIT sera were assessed for rMal d 1-specific IgG antibodies in ELISA and for their ability to inhibit apple allergen-induced upregulation of CD63 on basophils from nontreated individuals with birch pollen-related apple allergy. Post-SLIT sera depleted of IgG1 or IgG4 were compared for their IgE-blocking activity. IgG1 binding to rMal d 1 was competed with rMal d 1 and rBet v 1 in ELISA. SLIT with rMal d 1 and rBet v 1 induced comparable levels of rMal d 1-specific IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 antibodies. Only post-rMal d 1 SLIT sera displayed IgE-blocking activity, which was significantly reduced by depletion of IgG1 and less so by IgG4 depletion. In competition ELISA, IgG1 binding to Mal d 1 in post-rMal d 1 SLIT sera was fully inhibited with rMal d 1 but not with rBet v 1. Correspondingly, Bet v 1 was the more potent competitor for IgG1 binding to Mal d 1 in post-rBet v 1 SLIT sera. rMal d 1 SLIT for 16 weeks induced functional, primarily Mal d 1-specific IgE-blocking antibodies, whereas rBet v 1 SLIT induced Bet v 1-specific, Mal d 1-cross-reactive IgG antibodies with limited cross-blocking activity. These results provide a possible explanation for the limited effectiveness of birch pollen immunotherapy in birch pollen-related food allergy and indicate a dominant protective role of functional IgE-blocking IgG1 antibodies in the early phase of allergy treatment.

Sánchez Acosta G ，Kinaciyan T ，Kitzmüller C ，Möbs C ，Pfützner W ，Bohle B ... -  《-》

The Effect of Birch Pollen Immunotherapy on Apple and rMal d 1 Challenges in Adults with Apple Allergy.

van der Valk JPM ，Nagl B ，van Wljk RG ，Bohle B ，de Jong NW ... -  《Nutrients》

Oral exposure to Mal d 1 affects the immune response in patients with birch pollen allergy.

Antibodies and T cells specific for the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 cross-react with structurally related food allergens, such as Mal d 1 in apple. We sought to evaluate the effects of oral uptake of Mal d 1 on the allergen-specific immune response in patients with birch pollen allergy. Patients received 50 μg of rBet v 1 sublingually on 2 consecutive days outside of the birch pollen season. One year later, equal amounts of rMal d 1 were administered. Blood samples were collected before and after oral exposure, as well as before and after the intermediate birch pollen season. Allergen-specific IgE levels were determined by using ImmunoCAP. Proliferation of allergen-stimulated PBMCs was assessed, as well as the expression of IL-5, IL-13, IL-10, IFN-γ, and forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3) in isolated T cells (real-time PCR). Allergen-specific T-cell lines were analyzed for epitope recognition. Orally administered Bet v 1 transiently reduced Bet v 1-specific serum IgE levels, as well as Bet v 1- and Mal d 1-induced T-cell proliferation, and enhanced the expression of IL-5, IL-10, and Foxp3. Orally applied Mal d 1 significantly decreased Bet v 1- and Mal d 1-specific IgE levels and induced IL-5 and IL-10 but no Foxp3 expression. In contrast to Bet v 1, Mal d 1 triggered IFN-γ production and T cells with a different epitope repertoire. Inhalation of birch pollen significantly enhanced allergen-specific IgE levels, T-cell proliferation, and IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, and Foxp3 expression. Two sublingual administrations of 50 μg of Mal d 1 were well tolerated and induced transient immune responses seen during peripheral tolerance development. Thus recombinant Mal d 1 might be suitable and relevant for sublingual treatment of birch pollen-related apple allergy.

Geroldinger-Simic M ，Kinaciyan T ，Nagl B ，Baumgartner-Durchschlag U ，Huber H ，Ebner C ，Lidholm J ，Bartel D ，Vieths S ，Jahn-Schmid B ，Bohle B ... -  《-》