Efficacy of midtrimester short cervix interventions is conditional on intraamniotic inflammation.

Midtrimester ultrasound is a valuable method for identifying asymptomatic women at risk for spontaneous preterm delivery (PTD). However, response to various treatments (cerclage, progestogen) has been variable in the clinical setting. It remains unclear how other biomarkers may be used to guide intervention strategies. We applied an amniotic fluid inflammatory scoring system to determine if the degree of inflammation is associated with intervention efficacy in patients with midtrimester short cervix. Women carrying a singleton fetus between 16-24 weeks' gestation with a short cervix (≤25 mm) on transvaginal ultrasound underwent amniocentesis and were assigned to McDonald cerclage, no cerclage, or weekly 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP-C). Our previously described inflammatory risk score (comprised of 14 inflammatory markers) was used to classify patients as high (score ≥8) or low (score <8) risk for inflammation. Gestational age at delivery was compared for each intervention and risk score status. Risk of delivering as a function of the remaining gestation was evaluated using modified Cox proportional hazards models with incorporation of methods to account for both left and right truncation bias. Ninety patients were included: 24 were in the nonintervention control group, 51 received cerclage, and 15 received 17OHP-C. Inflammation status at time of sampling influenced the efficacy of the treatment (P < .001). Compared to the nonintervention control group, in patients with low inflammation (score < 8), both cerclage (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-6.37) and 17OHP-C (HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.04-9.30) were associated with increased hazard of PTD. In contrast, in patients with high inflammation (score ≥8) both cerclage (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.65) and 17OHP-C (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.81) were associated with lower hazard of delivering preterm. Cerclage placement or administration of 17OHP-C therapy for midtrimester short cervix for PTD prevention appears beneficial only in the subset of patients with high inflammation. Knowledge of the amniotic fluid inflammatory status may aid in guiding the appropriate therapy for women presenting with midtrimester short cervix who are at increased risk of PTD.

Kiefer DG ，Peltier MR ，Keeler SM ，Rust O ，Ananth CV ，Vintzileos AM ，Hanna N ... -  《-》

A randomized trial of cerclage vs. 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for treatment of short cervix.

Keeler SM ，Kiefer D ，Rochon M ，Quinones JN ，Novetsky AP ，Rust O ... -  《-》

17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate does not prolong pregnancy or reduce the rate of preterm birth in women at high risk for preterm delivery and a short cervix: a randomized controlled trial.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP-C) in prolonging gestation in patients with a short cervix and other risk factors for preterm delivery, such as previous preterm birth, cervical surgery, uterine anomalies, or prenatal diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure. This open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial included asymptomatic singleton pregnancies from 20(+0) through 31(+6) weeks of gestation with a cervical length less than 25 mm and a history of preterm delivery or cervical surgery or uterine malformation or prenatal DES exposure. Randomization assigned them to receive (or not) 500 mg of intramuscular 17OHP-C weekly until 36 weeks. The primary outcome was time from randomization to delivery. After enrolling 105 patients, an interim analysis demonstrated the lack of efficacy of 17OHP-C in prolonging pregnancy. The study was discontinued because of futility. The groups were similar for maternal age, body mass index, parity, gestational age at inclusion, history of uterine anomalies, DES syndrome, previous preterm delivery or midtrimester abortion, and cervical length at randomization. The enrollment-to-delivery interval did not differ between patients allocated to 17OHP-C (n = 51) and those allocated to the control group (n = 54) (median [interquartile range] time to delivery: 77 [54-103] and 74 [52-99] days, respectively). The rate of preterm delivery less than 37 (45% vs 44%, P > .99), less than 34 (24% vs 30%, P = .51), or less than 32 (14% vs 20%, P = .44) weeks was similar in patients allocated to 17OHP-C and those in the control group. 17OHP-C did not prolong pregnancy in women with singleton gestations, a sonographic short cervix, and other risk factors of preterm delivery (prior history, uterine malformations, cervical surgery, or prenatal DES exposure).

Winer N ，Bretelle F ，Senat MV ，Bohec C ，Deruelle P ，Perrotin F ，Connan L ，Vayssière C ，Langer B ，Capelle M ，Azimi S ，Porcher R ，Rozenberg P ，Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique et Gynécologie ... -  《-》

17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate versus vaginal progesterone suppository for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographically short cervix: A randomized controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to compare 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP-C) with vaginal progesterone suppository for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographically short cervix and to evaluate the changes of the cervical length (CL) over time. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, eligible patients were asymptomatic pregnant women with a sonographically short cervix. The participants in group 1 (n = 147) received vaginal progesterone suppositories at a dose of 400 mg daily and the women in group 2 (n = 150) received an i.m. dose of 250 mg 17OHP-C once a week. Transvaginal sonography was repeated every 3 weeks until 36 gestational weeks or the occurrence of preterm labor. A total of 304 singleton pregnant women between 16 and 24 gestational weeks with CL < 25 mm were enrolled in our study. The rates of preterm birth were 10.4% in the progesterone group and 14% in the 17OHP-C group: a difference that was not statistically significant (P = 0.416). Moreover, 264 participants underwent ultrasound examination five times and CL changes were studied for 15 weeks. The results showed that the CL changes over 15 weeks were statistically significant (P < 0.001), but the method of intervention (progesterone/17OHP-C) had no significant effect on CL change (P = 0.64). Our findings showed that vaginal progesterone and 17OHP-C had the same effect on the risk of preterm labor in asymptomatic women with a sonographically short cervix. We detected no significant difference between the effect of 17OHP-C and vaginal progesterone on CL changes over time.

Pirjani R ，Heidari R ，Rahimi-Foroushani A ，Bayesh S ，Esmailzadeh A ... -  《-》

Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis.

An indirect comparison meta-analysis published in 2013 reported that both vaginal progesterone and cerclage are equally efficacious for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a sonographic short cervix. The efficacy of vaginal progesterone has been challenged after publication of the OPPTIMUM study. However, this has been resolved by an individual patient-data meta-analysis (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:161-180). To compare the efficacy of vaginal progesterone and cerclage in preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a midtrimester sonographic short cervix. MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CINAHL (from their inception to March 2018); Cochrane databases, bibliographies, and conference proceedings. Randomized controlled trials comparing vaginal progesterone to placebo/no treatment or cerclage to no cerclage in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a sonographic cervical length <25 mm. Updated systematic review and adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis of vaginal progesterone vs cerclage using placebo/no cerclage as the common comparator. The primary outcomes were preterm birth <35 weeks of gestation and perinatal mortality. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Five trials comparing vaginal progesterone vs placebo (265 women) and 5 comparing cerclage vs no cerclage (504 women) were included. Vaginal progesterone, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the risk of preterm birth <35 and <32 weeks of gestation, composite perinatal morbidity/mortality, neonatal sepsis, composite neonatal morbidity, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (RRs from 0.29 to 0.68). Cerclage, compared to no cerclage, significantly decreased the risk of preterm birth <37, <35, <32, and <28 weeks of gestation, composite perinatal morbidity/mortality, and birthweight <1500 g (RRs from 0.64 to 0.70). Adjusted indirect comparison meta-analyses did not show statistically significant differences between vaginal progesterone and cerclage in the reduction of preterm birth or adverse perinatal outcomes. Vaginal progesterone and cerclage are equally effective for preventing preterm birth and improving perinatal outcomes in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a midtrimester sonographic short cervix. The choice of treatment will depend on adverse events and cost-effectiveness of interventions and patient/physician's preferences.

Conde-Agudelo A ，Romero R ，Da Fonseca E ，O'Brien JM ，Cetingoz E ，Creasy GW ，Hassan SS ，Erez O ，Pacora P ，Nicolaides KH ... -  《-》