Comparison of Outcomes of Hematopoietic Cell Transplants from T-Replete Haploidentical Donors Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide with 10 of 10 HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 Allele-Matched Unrelated Donors and HLA-Identical Sibling Donors: A Mul

Outcomes of 475 consecutive patients undergoing first allogeneic transplantation for hematologic malignancy performed using T-replete HLA-haploidentical donors and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (HIDT; n = 116) were compared with contemporaneous patients transplanted from 10 of 10 HLA allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDT; n = 178) or HLA-identical sibling donors (MRDT; n = 181). Uniform supportive care measures and assessments were used. Median follow-up was 45 months. HIDT patients were more likely than MUDT patients to be black (44% versus 2%; P < .001). At 2 years after transplantation, estimates of overall survival were 57% for HIDT, 59% for MUDT, and 72% for MRDT (P not significant [NS] for HIDT versus MUDT; P = .02 for HIDT versus MRDT); corresponding disease-free survival rates were 54%, 50%, and 56% (P NS for both comparisons). The respective cumulative incidences (CIs) of nonrelapse mortality were 17%, 16%, 14%, and those of relapse were 29%, 34%, and 30% (P NS for all). The respective CIs of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV were 41%, 48%, and 28% (P = NS for HIDT versus MUDT; P = .005 for HIDT versus MRDT). At 2 years, the respective CIs of moderate/severe chronic GVHD were 31%, 47%, and 44% (P = .004 for HIDT versus MUDT; P = .032 for HIDT versus MRDT) and 19% of HIDT recipients, 42% of MUDT recipients, and 35% of MRDT recipients were on systemic immunosuppressive treatment (P = .007 for HIDT versus MUDT). In recipients of peripheral blood stem cell grafts, the incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was significantly lower in HIDT recipients compared with MUDT recipients (2-year CI, 25% versus 48%; P = .002). In a multivariate analysis incorporating Disease Risk Index and other significant covariates, survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; P = .15) and disease-free survival (HR, 0.96; P = .79) were not significantly different between HIDT and MUDT recipients, but the incidence of chronic GVHD was lower in HIDT recipients (moderate-severe, HR, 0.59; P = .007). HIDT produced similar long-term survival with lower rates of chronic GVHD than optimally matched MUDT. HIDT should be considered a standard of care option for patients lacking a matched sibling donor.

Bashey A ，Zhang X ，Jackson K ，Brown S ，Ridgeway M ，Solh M ，Morris LE ，Holland HK ，Solomon SR ... -  《-》

Who Is a Better Donor for Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Young HLA-Mismatched Haploidentical Relative or an Older Fully HLA-Matched Sibling or Unrelated Donor?

T cell replete HLA-mismatched haploidentical transplantation (HIDT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide is increasingly becoming an acceptable treatment approach for patients lacking timely access to a suitably matched related donor transplant (MRDT) or matched unrelated donor transplant (MUDT). Multiple recent registry and single-center studies have shown comparable overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates among HIDT, MRDT, and MUDT with a significantly lower risk of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) among HIDT recipients. Candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) often have access to multiple donor sources, and a relevant question is whether outcomes can be improved with a younger HLA-mismatched haploidentical donor (≤35 years) rather than an older matched related donor (≥35 years) or matched unrelated donor (≥35 years). We analyzed 406 consecutive allogenic HSCT recipients, with a median age of 54 years (range, 19 to 77), after a MRDT with a donor age of ≥35 years (n = 222), MUDT with a donor age of ≥35 years (n = 91), and HIDT with a donor age of ≤35 years (n = 93). Median follow-up time for survivors was 51.5 months. Compared with MRDT and MUDT, HIDT recipients had a similar median age at time of HSCT, hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index, disease risk index distribution, and donor recipient sex matching. The survival estimates and relapse incidence at 3 years post-HSCT were OS (64% for MRDT, 54% for MUDT, and 62% for HIDT), DFS (55% for MRDT, 44% for MUDT, and 58% for HIDT), Transplant related mortality (TRM) (19% for MRDT, 16% for MUDT, and 18% for HIDT), and relapse (26% for MRDT, 37% for MUDT, and 24% for HIDT). HIDT recipients had better 3-year relapse rates compared with MUDT recipients (24% versus 37%, P= .048), with similar DFS and OS in a univariate analysis. MRDT recipients had a better relapse rate (26% versus 37%, P = .042) compared with MUDT recipients. Recipients of HIDT also had significantly lower rates of moderate to severe chronic GVHD compared with MRDT and MUDT recipients (P = .01). Multivariable analysis showed no effect of donor on OS, DFS, relapse, and TRM. Recipients of HIDT from a young donor ≤35 years had similar OS, lower rates of chronic GVHD, and better chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival compared with patients undergoing transplantation with an MRD or a MUD donor ≥35 years. This study suggests that given a situation where a choice between a young haploidentical relative and an older matched unrelated donor is to be made, one can achieve similar survival with a haploidentical donor and significantly lower rates of chronic GVHD.

Karam E ，Laporte J ，Solomon SR ，Morris LE ，Zhang X ，Holland HK ，Bashey A ，Solh MM ... -  《-》

T Cell-Replete HLA Haploidentical Donor Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Is an Effective Salvage for Patients Relapsing after an HLA-Matched Related or Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation.

A second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using the same donor or another fully matched donor is an effective treatment approach for a subset of patients relapsing after a matched related (MRDT) or matched unrelated donor transplant (MUDT). There are limited data on the use of haploidentical transplantation (HIDT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in the setting of a second HSCT after an MRDT or MUDT. We analyzed the outcomes of 20 patients who received HIDT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide as a second HSCT after an MRDT (n = 10) or MUDT (n = 10). The median time from the first to the second HSCT was 20.7 months (range, 2.7 to 65.8). Ten patients had acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome, 6 had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 2 had chronic lymphoblastic leukemia, and 2 had myeloproliferative neoplasms. All patients received cytoreductive therapy before HIDT, with 12 (60%) achieving complete remission and 8 (40%) with active disease at the time of transplant. All patients achieved sustained engraftment with median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment of 17.5 days (range, 14 to 44) and 32 days (range, 15 to 99), respectively. Nineteen patients (95%) achieved full donor chimerism in both the T cell and myeloid lineages at day 30 post-HSCT. The cumulative incidences of grades II to IV and grades III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease at 180 days were 36% and 10%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease was 13% at 1 year post-HIDT. At a median follow-up of 38 months, the probability of overall survival, disease-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse post-HIDT were 52%, 39%, 29%, and 33% at 1 year and 34%, 31%, 29%, and 40% at 3 years, respectively. These data suggest that HIDT is an effective strategy to treat relapsed hematologic malignancies after MRDT or MUDT. Further studies to confirm these observations are warranted.

Gorgeis J ，Zhang X ，Connor K ，Brown S ，Solomon SR ，Morris LE ，Holland HK ，Bashey A ，Solh M ... -  《-》

T-cell-replete HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation for hematologic malignancies using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide results in outcomes equivalent to those of contemporaneous HLA-matched related and unrelated donor transplantation.

Bashey A ，Zhang X ，Sizemore CA ，Manion K ，Brown S ，Holland HK ，Morris LE ，Solomon SR ... -  《-》

Post-relapse survival after haploidentical transplantation vs matched-related or matched-unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Solh M ，Zhang X ，Connor K ，Brown S ，Solomon SR ，Morris LE ，Holland HK ，Bashey A ... -  《-》