Simple Neurectomy Versus Neurectomy With Intramuscular Implantation for Interdigital Neuroma: A Comparative Study.

Simple neurectomy is a standard treatment of interdigital nerve neuroma after failure of conservative treatment. Recently, neurectomy with intramuscular implantation of the proximal nerve stump has been proposed as a safe and effective alternative method providing significant pain improvement. However, there remains little evidence supporting one technique over the other. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes and complications of simple neurectomy versus neurectomy with intramuscular implantation. Retrospective chart review along with prospectively collected data of 99 consecutive patients (105 feet with 118 neuromas) who were diagnosed with interdigital neuroma of the foot and underwent simple neurectomy (66 patients / 72 feet / 78 neuromas) and neurectomy with intramuscular implantation of proximal nerve stump into intrinsic muscle of foot (33 patients / 33 feet / 40 neuromas) between 2000 and 2013. The minimum follow-up to be included in the study was 6 months for both techniques (mean = 44.6 months, range = 6 to 150 months for simple neurectomy; and mean = 19.3 months, range = 6 to 66 months for neurectomy with intramuscular implantation of proximal nerve stump into the intrinsic muscle). The primary outcomes were Foot Function Index (FFI); pain, disability, activity limitation, and total score, Short Form-36 (SF-36: physical and mental component scores); and visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included operative time and complications. Pre- and postoperative SF-36, and FFI, and pain (VAS) scores were obtained and compared using a paired t test. An independent t test was used to assess the functional outcomes and operative time between the 2 groups, and a chi-square test was used to compare the complications between the 2 techniques. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement of postoperative functional outcomes (FFI, SF-36, and VAS; P < .001, all) compared to the preoperative period. Neurectomy with intramuscular implantation demonstrated significant improvement of pain compared to simple neurectomy as measured with VAS (P = .002); however, the operative time was significantly longer than the simple neurectomy technique (P = .001). The rest of the functional outcomes measured were comparable between the 2 techniques. Complications in both simple neurectomy and implantation techniques were persistent pain (11.5% vs. 2.5%, P = .07), revision rate (5.1% vs. 0.0%, P = .08), and painful scar (5.1% vs. 5.0%, P = .83), respectively, but it did not reach statistical significance (P > .05, all). Both simple neurectomy and neurectomy with intramuscular implantation demonstrated significant improvement in terms of functional outcomes as measured with the FFI, SF-36, and VAS in patients with interdigital neuroma. Although requiring a longer operative time, neurectomy with intramuscular implantation technique might offer superior pain relief with comparable complications to the simple neurectomy technique.

Rungprai C ，Cychosz CC ，Phruetthiphat O ，Femino JE ，Amendola A ，Phisitkul P ... -  《-》

Long-term results of neurectomy in the treatment of Morton's neuroma: more than 10 years' follow-up.

Lee KT ，Kim JB ，Young KW ，Park YU ，Kim JS ，Jegal H ... -  《-》

Neurectomy for treatment of intercostal neuralgia.

Williams EH ，Williams CG ，Rosson GD ，Heitmiller RF ，Dellon AL ... -  《-》

Metatarsalgia and Morton's Disease: Comparison of Outcomes Between Open Procedure and Neurectomy Versus Percutaneous Metatarsal Osteotomies and Ligament Release With a Minimum of 2 Years of Follow-Up.

The present study compared the clinical results of open neurectomy versus a percutaneous procedure for Morton's disease. This was a retrospective study comparing the functional results after 2 surgical procedures: open neurectomy and a percutaneous procedure (with deep transverse metatarsal ligament release and distal metatarsal osteotomies). The present study included 52 patients (26 in each group), and the mean follow-up period was 4 (range 2 to 7) years. The patient evaluation criteria included the presence of painful symptoms of Morton's disease, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) functional scale score, patient satisfaction, and delay for recovery. Percutaneous treatment of Morton's disease and open neurectomy produced complete relief of pain in 25 of 26 patients in each group. At the latest follow-up visit, the mean AOFAS score had significantly improved from 36 ± 11 preoperatively to a mean of 89 ± 18 (p < .001). After 2 years, the functional improvement obtained with the percutaneous procedure persisted, with a stable AOFAS score (96 ± 10). Persistent metatarsalgia was reported by patients who had undergone open neurectomy, with a significantly decreased AOFAS score (81 ± 21, p = .009). The percutaneous procedure for Morton's disease provided excellent functional outcomes (AOFAS score >90) significantly more often with a shorter delay than after open neurectomy (p = .03). At the latest follow-up visit, metatarsalgia due to plantar hyperpressure or bursitis and requiring plantar orthotics was present in 11 of 26 patients (44%) after open neurectomy and in 1 of 26 patients (4%) after the percutaneous procedure (p = .002). Percutaneous treatment of Morton's disease is a reliable procedure providing results as good as those after open neurectomy, with significantly better outcomes in the longer term and a lower rate of late metatarsalgia.

Bauer T ，Gaumetou E ，Klouche S ，Hardy P ，Maffulli N ... -  《-》

Outcomes of the surgical treatment of peripheral neuromas of the hand and forearm: a 25-year comparative outcome study.

Guse DM ，Moran SL 《-》