Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus vinorelbine versus cisplatin plus fluorouracil for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A matched case-control study.

To compare the clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin/vinorelbine versus cisplatin/fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Between 2000 and 2012, 279 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) undergoing neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery were reviewed. Through a matched case-control study, 57 patients treated with cisplatin/vinorelbine were matched 1:1 to patients who received cisplatin/fluorouracil according to age, sex, performance status, tumor location, tumor length, and pretreatment TNM stage. Patient and disease-related characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 47.4% for the cisplatin/vinorelbine group and 28.1% for the cisplatin/fluorouracil group (P=0.034). Median overall survival (OS) in the cisplatin/vinorelbine group was significantly better compared with the cisplatin/fluorouracil group (52.8 vs. 25.2 months), with 3-year OS rates of 64.3% vs. 31.3%, respectively (P=0.001). However, cisplatin/vinorelbine was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 leukopenia than cisplatin/fluorouracil (P=0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that being female, age ⩾55 years, pCR after CRT, and chemotherapy with cisplatin/vinorelbine were independent positive prognostic factors for survival. Cisplatin/vinorelbine might lead to a higher pCR rate and better survival outcomes than cisplatin/fluorouracil in esophageal SCC. The incidence of hematologic toxicity is increased with cisplatin/vinorelbine, but is tolerable and manageable. Prospective controlled studies are required to confirm the efficacy of this regimen.

Liu SL ，Yang H ，Zhang P ，Zhang L ，Zhao L ，Luo LL ，Fu JH ，Liu MZ ，Xi M ... -  《-》

Comparing docetaxel plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

The optimal neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimen in esophageal cancer has not yet been defined. This study was aimed to compare the differences in pathologic response and survival between docetaxel/cisplatin and fluorouracil/cisplatin as neoadjuvant CRT in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We retrospectively analyzed patients with thoracic esophageal SCC who received neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy from 2000 to 2014. After adjusting for sex, age, performance status, tumor length, tumor location and clinical TNM stage, 32 docetaxel/cisplatin-treated patients were matched to 62 patients who received fluorouracil/cisplatin at a ratio of 1:2. Treatment toxicity, pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. The pCR rate in the docetaxel/cisplatin group was higher than that in the fluorouracil/cisplatin group but without significant difference (40.6% vs. 30.6%, P = 0.333). The 3-year overall survival rate in the docetaxel/cisplatin group was 64.9% versus 46.0% in the fluorouracil/cisplatin group (P = 0.039). There were no significant differences in incidence of treatment toxicity during CRT or surgical complications between groups, with the exception of Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity (37.5% vs. 17.7%, P = 0.035), which was more frequent in the docetaxel/cisplatin group. Docetaxel/cisplatin might be associated with more favorable survival than fluorouracil/cisplatin in esophageal SCC treated with neoadjuvant CRT. Prospective validation is warranted.

Xi M ，Zhang P ，Zhang L ，Yang YD ，Liu SL ，Li Y ，Fu JH ，Liu MZ ... -  《-》

Is There a Correlation Between Clinical Complete Response and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer?

Liu SL ，Xi M ，Yang H ，Yang YD ，Wu YJ ，Zhao L ，Zhang P ，Luo LL ，Liu MZ ... -  《-》

Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Hu G ，Wang Z ，Wang Y ，Zhang Q ，Tang N ，Guo J ，Liu L ，Han X ... -  《Drug Design Development and Therapy》

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin/5-fluorouracil is associated with increased pathologic complete response and improved survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Trimodal therapy consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy has become the standard of care in North America for locally advanced esophageal cancer. While cisplatin/5-fluorouracil has been a common concurrent chemotherapy regimen since the 1980s, its utilization has declined in recent years as the Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) trial regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel has become widely adopted. The efficacy of the CROSS regimen compared to alternate chemotherapy choices, however, has rarely been evaluated when each is used as a component of a trimodal treatment approach. The aim of this study is to report our institutional experience with these two concurrent chemotherapy regimens at a specialized esophageal cancer center.We performed an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional foregut registry from a single National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center. Esophageal cancer patients who completed trimodal therapy with a chemotherapy regimen of either carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/5-fluorouracil were identified and divided into groups based on their chemotherapy regimens. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze pathologic complete response rates, while the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate recurrence-free and overall survival. Analytical models were adjusted for age, clinical stage, radiation dose, histologic subtype (adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma), and time interval from completion of neoadjuvant therapy to surgery.One hundred and forty-two patients treated between January of 2000 and July of 2015 were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. Of this group, 87 had received the CROSS regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel, while 55 had completed cisplatin/5-fluorouracil. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil.group had an increased odds of pathologic complete response (odds ratio = 2.68, 95% confidence interval, P = 0.032), as well as significantly improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.73, P = 0.003) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.87, P = 0.016), compared to the carboplatin/paclitaxel group.Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with higher rates of pathologic complete response and improved recurrence-free and overall survival compared to the CROSS regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel. This suggests that, for select patients, alternate neoadjuvant chemotherapy approaches, such as cisplatin/5-fluorouracil, merit reconsideration as potential primary treatment choices in the management of this highly morbid disease.

Haisley KR ，Hart KD ，Nabavizadeh N ，Bensch KG ，Vaccaro GM ，Thomas CR Jr ，Schipper PH ，Hunter JG ，Dolan JP ... -  《-》