Prospective study evaluating the relative sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT for detecting skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma in comparison to multidetector CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, using an adaptive trial design.

The detection of occult bone metastases is a key factor in determining the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially when curative surgery is considered. This prospective study assessed the sensitivity of (18)F-labelled sodium fluoride in conjunction with positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-NaF PET/CT) for detecting RCC bone metastases, compared with conventional imaging by bone scintigraphy or CT. An adaptive two-stage trial design was utilized, which was stopped after the first stage due to statistical efficacy. Ten patients with stage IV RCC and bone metastases were imaged with (18)F-NaF PET/CT and (99m)Tc-labelled methylene diphosphonate ((99m)Tc-MDP) bone scintigraphy including pelvic single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Images were reported independently by experienced radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians using a 5-point scoring system. Seventy-seven lesions were diagnosed as malignant: 100% were identified by (18)F-NaF PET/CT, 46% by CT and 29% by bone scintigraphy/SPECT. Standard-of-care imaging with CT and bone scintigraphy identified 65% of the metastases reported by (18)F-NaF PET/CT. On an individual patient basis, (18)F-NaF PET/CT detected more RCC metastases than (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy/SPECT or CT alone (P = 0.007). The metabolic volumes, mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUV mean and SUV max) of the malignant lesions were significantly greater than those of the benign lesions (P < 0.001). (18)F-NaF PET/CT is significantly more sensitive at detecting RCC skeletal metastases than conventional bone scintigraphy or CT. The detection of occult bone metastases could greatly alter patient management, particularly in the context when standard-of-care imaging is negative for skeletal metastases.

Gerety EL ，Lawrence EM ，Wason J ，Yan H ，Hilborne S ，Buscombe J ，Cheow HK ，Shaw AS ，Bird N ，Fife K ，Heard S ，Lomas DJ ，Matakidou A ，Soloviev D ，Eisen T ，Gallagher FA ... -  《-》

Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc MDP scintigraphy, (18)F NaF PET/CT, and (18)F FDG PET/CT for detection of skeletal metastases.

Iagaru A ，Mittra E ，Dick DW ，Gambhir SS ... -  《-》

Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.

Qiu ZL ，Xue YL ，Song HJ ，Luo QY ... -  《-》

Comparison of Bone Metastases between (18)F-NaF PET/CT, (18)F-NaF PET, and Planar (99m)Tc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Our study aims to compare the diagnostic value of 18F-NaF positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT), 18F-NaF PET, and planar 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Our study retrospectively analyzed 58 patients with pathologically proven NPC. They all underwent both 18F-NaF PET/CT and planar 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy within a 7-day interval. Bone metastases were confirmed by follow-up using PET/CT, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These three examinations were compared using per-patient-based analysis and per-lesion-based analysis. 19 patients (32.7%) were classified as having bone metastatic disease in their final diagnosis. The patient-based diagnostic performances (sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy) were as follows: 18F-NaF PET/CT (100%, 92.3%, and 94.8%), 18F-NaF PET (100%, 53.8%, and 69.0%), and planar 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy (78.9%, 74.4%, and 75.9%). The overall accuracy of 18F-NaF PET/CT was significantly more favorable compared to 18F-NaF PET (p=0.002) and to planar 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy (p=0.044). The lesion-based diagnostic performances (sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy) were as follows: 18F-NaF PET/CT (98.5%, 93.9%, and 96.6%), 18F-NaF PET (98.5%, 57.1%, and 81.1%), and planar 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy (69.9%, 85.7%, and 76.4%). 18F-NaF PET/CT outperforms 18F-NaF PET or planar 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastases with newly diagnosed NPC on a patient-based and lesion-based analysis.

Wang D ，Yang Y ，Zeng Z ，Ye J ，Guo C ，Huang S ，Guo X ，Xiao J ... -  《-》

Intra-individual comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET-CT and (99m)Tc bone scintigraphy with SPECT in patients with prostate cancer or breast cancer at high risk for skeletal metastases (MITNEC-A1): a multicentre, phase 3 trial.

Detection of skeletal metastases in patients with prostate cancer or breast cancer remains a major clinical challenge. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) single-photon emission CT (SPECT) and 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET-CT for the detection of osseous metastases in patients with high-risk prostate or breast cancer. MITNEC-A1 was a prospective, multicentre, single-cohort, phase 3 trial conducted in ten hospitals across Canada. Patients aged 18 years or older with breast or prostate cancer with a WHO performance status of 0-2 and with high risk or clinical suspicion for bone metastasis, but without previously documented bone involvement, were eligible. 18F-NaF PET-CT and 99mTc-MDP SPECT were done within 14 days of each other for each participant. Two independent reviewers interpreted each modality without knowledge of other imaging findings. The primary endpoint was the overall accuracy of 99mTc-MDP SPECT and 18F-NaF PET-CT scans for the detection of bone metastases in the per-protocol population. A combination of histopathological, clinical, and imaging follow-up for up to 24 months was used as the reference standard to assess the imaging results. Safety was assessed in all enrolled participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01930812, and is complete. Between July 11, 2014, and March 3, 2017, 290 patients were screened, 288 of whom were enrolled (64 participants with breast cancer and 224 with prostate cancer). 261 participants underwent both 18F-NaF PET-CT and 99mTc-MDP SPECT and completed the required follow-up for statistical analysis. Median follow-up was 735 days (IQR 727-750). Based on the reference methods used, 109 (42%) of 261 patients had bone metastases. In the patient-based analysis, 18F-NaF PET-CT was more accurate than 99mTc-MDP SPECT (84·3% [95% CI 79·9-88·7] vs 77·4% [72·3-82·5], difference 6·9% [95% CI 1·3-12·5]; p=0·016). No adverse events were reported for the 288 patients recruited. 18F-NaF has the potential to displace 99mTc-MDP as the bone imaging radiopharmaceutical of choice in patients with high-risk prostate or breast cancer. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Bénard F ，Harsini S ，Wilson D ，Zukotynski K ，Abikhzer G ，Turcotte E ，Cossette M ，Metser U ，Romsa J ，Martin M ，Mar C ，Saad F ，Soucy JP ，Eigl BJ ，Black P ，Krauze A ，Burrell S ，Nichol A ，Tardif JC ... -  《-》