Pediatric Pain Management in the Emergency Department: The Triage Nurses' Perspective.

Understanding triage nurses' perspectives of pain management is essential for timely pain care for children in the emergency department. Objectives of this study were to describe the triage pain treatment protocols used, knowledge of pain management modalities, and barriers and attitudes towards implementation of pain treatment protocols. A paper-based survey was administered to all triage nurses at three Canadian pediatric emergency departments, between December 2011 and January 2012. The response rate was 86% (n=126/147). The mean respondent age was 40 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.3) with 8.6 years (SD 7.7) of triage experience. General triage emergency department (GTED) nurses rated adequacy of triage pain treatment lower than pediatric-only triage emergency department (PTED) nurses (P < .001). GTED nurses reported a longer acceptable delay between triage time and administration of analgesia than PTED nurses (P < .002). Most nurses rated more comfort with a protocol involving administration of acetaminophen (97 mm, interquartile range [IQR] 92, 99) or ibuprofen (97 mm, IQR 93, 100) than for oral morphine (67 mm, IQR 35, 94) or oxycodone (57 mm, IQR 15, 81). The top three reported barriers to triage-initiated pain protocols were monitoring capability, time, and access to medications. Willingness to implement a triage-initiated pain protocol was rated as 81 mm (IQR 71, 96). Triage nurses are willing to implement pain protocols for children in the emergency department, but differences in comfort and experience exist between PTED and GTED nurses. Provision of triage initiated pain protocols and associated education may empower nurses to improve care for children in pain in the emergency department.

Thomas D ，Kircher J ，Plint AC ，Fitzpatrick E ，Newton AS ，Rosychuk RJ ，Grewal S ，Ali S ... -  《-》

Nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pain in the emergency department.

The purpose of this study was to investigate emergency nurses' knowledge and attitudes about pain. A descriptive design was used for this study. A validated tool, the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP), was administered to nurses working in 5 U.S. emergency departments. Demographic data also were collected from each participant. Ninety-one emergency nurses completed the survey. The mean total KASRP score was 76%. No significant differences were found in mean total scores by age, education level, years of nursing experience, or years of ED experience. Eight questions were answered incorrectly by more than 50% of participants. Five of these questions were related to opioid pharmacology and dosage, 2 concerned understanding of addiction and dependence, and one was linked to nurse assessment and patient report of pain level. Analysis of these 8 questions revealed that higher education levels had a weak positive association with correct answers. Participants taking the survey scored comparably or better than participants in other reported studies using the KASRP. Years of nursing experience was not correlated with correct responses. Findings from this study underscore the Institute of Medicine's Pain in America recommendation to increase pain management education for all providers.

Moceri JT ，Drevdahl DJ 《-》

Triaging the Emergency Department, Not the Patient: United States Emergency Nurses' Experience of the Triage Process.

Triage, as it is understood in the context of the emergency department, is the first and perhaps the most formal stage of the initial patient encounter. Bottlenecks during intake and long waiting room times have been linked to higher rates of patients leaving without being seen. The solution in many emergency departments has been to collect less information at triage or use an "immediate bedding" or "pull until full" approach, in which patients are placed in treatment areas as they become available without previous screening. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' understanding of-and experience with-the triage process, and to identify facilitators and barriers to accurate acuity assignation. An exploratory qualitative study using focus-group interviews (N = 26). Five themes were identified: (1) "Sick or not sick," (2) "Competency/qualifications," (3) "Triaging the emergency department, not the patient," (4) "The unexpected," and (5) "Barriers and facilitators." Our participants described processes that were unit- and/or nurse-dependent and were manipulations of the triage system to "fix" problems in ED flow, rather than a standard application of a triage system. Our participants reported that, in practice, the use of triage scales to determine acuity and route patients to appropriate resources varies in accuracy and application among emergency nurses and in their respective emergency departments. Nurses in this sample reported a prevalence of "quick look" triage approaches that do not rely on physiologic data to make acuity decisions. Future research should focus on intervention and comparison studies examining the effect of staffing, nurse experience, hospital policies, and length of shift on the accuracy of triage decision making. Contribution to Emergency Nursing Practice.

Wolf LA ，Delao AM ，Perhats C ，Moon MD ，Zavotsky KE ... -  《-》

Deliberate self-harm: emergency department nurses' attitudes, triage and care intentions.

McCann TV ，Clark E ，McConnachie S ，Harvey I ... -  《JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING》

Australian triage nurses' decision-making and scope of practice.

Gerdtz M ，Bucknall T 《Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing》