Comparing stress testing and fractional flow reserve to evaluate presence, location and extent of ischemia in coronary artery disease.

FFR provides an accurate and reproducible assessment of the functional severity of coronary stenosis. Whereas stress testing remains the preferred initial modality for assessment of ischemia, there is limited data comparing it with FFR. We sought to determine the correlation between cardiac stress testing and coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement for assessing the presence, location, and burden of myocardial ischemia in patients referred for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Over 5-year study period, of the 5420 consecutive coronary angiograms that were screened, 326 patients had FFR measurements. Of these, 96 patients with FFR measurements who had a preceding stress test (stress echocardiography [SE] or myocardial perfusion imaging [MPI]) within a year were included. Of the 96 patients, there were 46 (48%) men and 50 (52%) women with a mean age of 61 ± 10 years. SE was performed in 57 (59.3%) and MPI in 32 (40.7%) of patients. FFR was ≤0.79 in 54 (56%) patients. Stress testing had low sensitivity (55%) and specificity (47%) compared to FFR. The concordance between FFR and stress testing was low for both presence (k=0.03) and location (k=0.05) of the ischemic territory. The number of ischemic vascular territories was correctly estimated in only 39% of the stress tests. SE was more likely to overestimate and MPI more likely to underestimate extent of ischemia. In patients referred for evaluation of CAD, there was poor correlation between stress testing and FFR. A prospective study comparing these two modalities with FFR is needed.

Pattanshetty DJ ，Bhat PK ，Gandhi S ，Pillai DP ，Aneja A ... -  《-》

Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between myocardial ischemia detected by myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single-photon emission computed tomography with intracoronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with multivessel coronary disease at angiography. Myocardial perfusion imaging can underestimate the number of ischemic territories in patients with multivessel disease. However, there are limited data comparing MPI and FFR, a highly accurate functional index of myocardial ischemia, in multivessel coronary disease. Sixty-seven patients (201 vascular territories) with angiographic 2- or 3-vessel coronary disease were prospectively scheduled to undergo within 2 weeks MPI (rest/stress adenosine) and FFR in each vessel. In 42% of patients, MPI and FFR detected identical ischemic territories (mean number of territories 0.9 +/- 0.8 for both; p = 1.00). In the remaining 36% MPI underestimated (mean number of territories; MPI: 0.46 +/- 0.6, FFR: 2.0 +/- 0.6; p < 0.001) and in 22% overestimated (mean number of territories; MPI: 1.9 +/- 0.8, FFR: 0.5 +/- 0.8; p < 0.001) the number of ischemic territories in comparison with FFR. There was poor concordance between the ability of the 2 methods to detect myocardial ischemia on both a per-patient (kappa = 0.14 [95% confidence interval: -0.10 to 0.39]) and per-vessel (kappa = 0.28 [95% confidence interval: 0.15 to 0.42]) basis. Myocardial perfusion imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography has poor concordance with FFR and tends to underestimate or overestimate the functional importance of coronary stenosis seen at angiography in comparison with FFR in patients with multivessel disease. These findings might have important consequences in using MPI to determine the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel coronary disease.

Melikian N ，De Bondt P ，Tonino P ，De Winter O ，Wyffels E ，Bartunek J ，Heyndrickx GR ，Fearon WF ，Pijls NH ，Wijns W ，De Bruyne B ... -  《-》

Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Ko BS ，Cameron JD ，Meredith IT ，Leung M ，Antonis PR ，Nasis A ，Crossett M ，Hope SA ，Lehman SJ ，Troupis J ，DeFrance T ，Seneviratne SK ... -  《-》

Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transmural perfusion gradient (TPG) and transmural perfusion gradient reserve (TPGR) with 3.0 T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) against invasively determined fractional flow reserve (FFR) to detect coronary artery stenosis. Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion with CMR to diagnosis coronary artery disease (CAD) has been widely accepted. However, traditional transmural myocardial perfusion analysis with CMR neglects that endocardium is more vulnerable to ischemia than epicardium. TPG and TPGR can take the inhomogenous perfusion impairment into account and be more sensitive and specific for diagnosis of CAD. In this study, 71 patients (57 men, age 60.1 ± 6.4 years) with known or suspected CAD referred for invasive angiography study underwent rest and adenosine-induced stress CMR perfusion imaging scan. FFR was attempted to be measured in all major epicardial coronary arteries. FFR ≤0.75 was regarded to indicate a hemodynamic significant coronary lesion. A TPG ≤0.85 predicted significant CAD with sensitivity and specificity of 74.55% and 83.65%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of TPGR ≤0.81 were 90.91% and 89.94%, respectively. Area under the receiver-operating curve to detect FFR ≤0.75 was 0.86 for TPG and 0.95 for TPGR. TPGR yielded significantly better sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of CAD than traditional myocardial blood flow, myocardial perfusion reserve, and TPG (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, TPG and TPGR analyses with MRI are capable of detecting hemodynamic stenosis of coronary artery and superior to traditional myocardial perfusion analysis. Furthermore, TPGR appears to be superior to TPG in the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis.

Pan J ，Huang S ，Lu Z ，Li J ，Wan Q ，Zhang J ，Gao C ，Yang X ，Wei M ... -  《-》

Rationale and Design of the CREDENCE Trial: computed TomogRaphic evaluation of atherosclerotic DEtermiNants of myocardial IsChEmia.

Rizvi A ，Hartaigh BÓ ，Knaapen P ，Leipsic J ，Shaw LJ ，Andreini D ，Pontone G ，Raman S ，Khan MA ，Ridner M ，Nabi F ，Gimelli A ，Jang J ，Cole J ，Nakazato R ，Zarins C ，Han D ，Lee JH ，Szymonifika J ，Gomez MJ ，Truong QA ，Chang HJ ，Lin FY ，Min JK ... -  《-》