In-vitro maturation of oocytes vs in-vitro fertilization with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: can superiority be defined?

来自 PUBMED

作者:

Shavit TEllenbogen AMichaeli MKartchovsky ERuzov OShalom-Paz E

展开

摘要:

Patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) are at increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Interventions to reduce the risk of OHSS in these patients include in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, and retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in-vitro maturation (IVM). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of IVM and IVF-GnRH antagonist protocols in women with PCOS undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Retrospective cohort study. Records of women with PCOS who underwent IVM or IVF-GnRH antagonist protocols between 2010 and 2011 were reviewed. In total, there were 61 IVM cycles and 53 IVF-GnRH antagonist cycles. The treatment protocols were compared in terms of the number of oocytes retrieved, dose of gonadotropin administrated, fertilization rates, quality of embryos, pregnancy, and delivery and abortion rates. The number (mean±standard deviation) of mature oocytes did not differ significantly between the two groups (7.11±5.7 vs 8.16±5.07 for the GnRH antagonist group and the IVM group, respectively; p=0.38). The average dose of gonadotropin (1938 IU±838 IU/cycle vs 118±199 IU/cycle; p<0.001), fertilization rate (77% vs 60%; p<0.001) and high-quality embryo rate (58.8% vs 48.3; p<0.001) were significantly higher in the GnRH antagonist group compared with the IVM group. Pregnancy rates (40% vs 25%; p=0.08), livebirth rates per pregnancy (71% vs 53%; p=0.265) and abortion rates (10% vs 27%; p=0.17) were comparable. The IVM protocol can be an alternative for infertile women with PCOS who wish to prevent the potential adverse effects of gonadotropin treatment. Prospective studies are needed to compare the outcomes of these two treatment protocols.

收起

展开

DOI:

10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.013

被引量:

7

年份:

1970

SCI-Hub (全网免费下载) 发表链接

通过 文献互助 平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。

查看求助

求助方法1:

知识发现用户

每天可免费求助50篇

求助

求助方法1:

关注微信公众号

每天可免费求助2篇

求助方法2:

求助需要支付5个财富值

您现在财富值不足

您可以通过 应助全文 获取财富值

求助方法2:

完成求助需要支付5财富值

您目前有 1000 财富值

求助

我们已与文献出版商建立了直接购买合作。

你可以通过身份认证进行实名认证,认证成功后本次下载的费用将由您所在的图书馆支付

您可以直接购买此文献,1~5分钟即可下载全文,部分资源由于网络原因可能需要更长时间,请您耐心等待哦~

身份认证 全文购买

相似文献(1786)

参考文献(0)

引证文献(7)

来源期刊

-

影响因子:暂无数据

JCR分区: 暂无

中科院分区:暂无

研究点推荐

关于我们

zlive学术集成海量学术资源,融合人工智能、深度学习、大数据分析等技术,为科研工作者提供全面快捷的学术服务。在这里我们不忘初心,砥砺前行。

友情链接

联系我们

合作与服务

©2024 zlive学术声明使用前必读