Nonreassuring fetal status during trial of labor after cesarean.

Concern for uterine rupture has led to the decline in vaginal births after cesarean. Nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) may precede uterine rupture. The objective of this study was to estimate the risks of uterine rupture, uterine dehiscence, and adverse fetal outcomes associated with NRFS during trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). In a retrospective cohort study of the previously reported Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network prospective cohort cesarean registry, we compared women undergoing repeat cesarean for NRFS after TOLAC to those requiring repeat cesarean for other intrapartum indications. Exclusion criteria included women with a prior cesarean who underwent elective or indicated repeat cesarean or women with a multiple gestation. Primary outcomes included uterine rupture or dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included 5-minute Apgar score <7 and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Planned subanalyses for term and preterm deliveries were performed. Stratified and logistic regression analyses were used. Of 17,740 women undergoing TOLAC, 4754 (26.8%) had a failed vaginal birth after cesarean. Of those, NRFS was the primary indication for cesarean in 1516 (31.9%). Women with NRFS as the primary indication for repeat cesarean were at increased risk of uterine rupture (adjusted odds ratio, 3.32; 95% confidence interval, 2.21-5.00), uterine dehiscence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.65), 5-minute Apgar score <7, and neonatal intensive care unit admission compared to women with other primary indications. Women attempting TOLAC who require repeat cesarean for NRFS are at increased risk of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence.

McPherson JA ，Strauss RA ，Stamilio DM 《-》

Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery.

To compare outcomes with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or elective repeat cesarean delivery on maternal request (ERCD-MR). Prospective cohort study. Danish university hospital. Women with TOLAC (n = 1161) and women with ERCD-MR (n = 622) between 2003 and 2010. Exclusion criteria were diabetes, two prior cesarean sections, index cesarean at a different hospital, a delivery after the index cesarean, twin gestation, gestational age <37(+0)  weeks and stillbirth. Data were obtained from the Aarhus Birth Cohort database, which comprised prospective registration of the deliveries. Adverse neonatal outcomes, risk factors for emergency cesarean, and uterine rupture in case of TOLAC. TOLAC was associated with an increased risk of neonatal depression [odds ratio (OR) 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-19.1] and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8). Within the TOLAC group 67% delivered vaginally. In the TOLAC group 1.3% (n = 15) of the women had a complete uterine rupture. None of these infants had sequelae after 12 months. Significant risk factors for emergency cesarean were no prior vaginal delivery (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), index emergency cesarean during labor (adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.3-4.1), maternal age ≥35 years (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8), pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥30 (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.3), and birthweight 4000-4499 g (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). Uterine rupture was associated with the use of epidural analgesia (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.9) and no prior vaginal delivery (p = 0.03). TOLAC is an acceptable individualized option for women without major risk factors.

Studsgaard A ，Skorstengaard M ，Glavind J ，Hvidman L ，Uldbjerg N ... -  《-》

Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

The primary cause of uterine scars is a previous cesarean. In women with a previous cesarean, the risks of maternal complications are rare and similar after a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) and after an elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD), but the risk of uterine rupture is higher with TOLAC (level of evidence [LE]2). Maternal morbidity in women with previous cesareans is higher when TOLAC fails than when it leads to successful vaginal delivery (LE2). Although maternal morbidity increases progressively with the number of ERCD, maternal morbidity of TOLAC decreases with the number of successful previous TOLAC (LE2). The risk-benefit ratio considering the risks of short- and long-term maternal complications is favorable to TOLAC in most cases (LE3). Globally, neonatal complications are rare regardless of the mode of delivery for women with previous cesareans. The risks of fetal, perinatal, and neonatal mortality during TOLAC are low. Nonetheless, these risks are significantly higher than those associated with ERCD (LE2). The risks of mask ventilation, intubation for meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal sepsis all increase in TOLAC (LE2). The risk of transient respiratory distress increases in ERCD (LE2). To reduce this risk, and except in particular situations, ERCD must not be performed before 39 weeks (grade B). TOLAC is possible for women with a previous cesarean before 37 weeks, with 2 previous cesareans, with a uterine malformation, a low vertical incision or an unknown incision, with a myomectomy, postpartum fever, an interval of less than 6 months between the last cesarean delivery and the conception of the following pregnancy, if the obstetric conditions are favorable (professional consensus). ERCD is recommended in women with a scar in the uterine body (grade B) and a history of 3 or more cesareans (professional consensus). Ultrasound assessment of the risk of uterine rupture in women with uterine scars has not been shown to have any clinical utility and is therefore not recommended during pregnancy to help decide the mode of delivery (professional consensus). Use of X-ray pelvimetry to decide about TOLAC is associated with an increase in the repeat cesarean rate without any reduction in the rate of uterine rupture (LE2). It is unnecessary for deciding mode of delivery and for managing labor during TOLAC (grade C). TOLAC should be encouraged for women with a previous vaginal delivery either before or after the cesarean, a favorable Bishop score or spontaneous labor, and for preterm births (grade C). For women with a fetus with an estimated weight of more than 4500 g, especially in the absence of a previous vaginal delivery and those with supermorbid obesity (BMI>50), ERCD must be planned from the outset (grade C). For all of the other clinical situations envisioned (maternal age>35 years, diabetes, morbid obesity, prolonged pregnancy, breech presentation and twin pregnancy), TOLAC is possible but the available data do not allow specific guidelines about the choice of mode of delivery, in view of the low levels of proof (grade C). The decision about planned mode of delivery must be shared by the patient and her physician and made by the 8th month, taking into account the individual risk factors for TOLAC failure and uterine rupture (professional consensus). TOLAC is the preferred choice for women who do not have several risk factors (professional consensus). The availability onsite of an obstetrician and anesthetist must be pointed out to the patient. If the woman continues to prefer a repeat cesarean after adequate information and time to think about it, her preference should be honored (professional consensus). Labor should be induced in woman with a previous cesarean only for medical indications (professional consensus). Induction of labor increases the risk of uterine rupture, which can be estimated at 1% if oxytocin is used and 2% with vaginal prostaglandins (LE2). Mechanical methods of induction have not been studied sufficiently. Misoprostol appears to increase the risk of uterine rupture strongly (LE4). Based on the information now available, its use is not recommended (professional consensus). Routine use of internal tocodynamometry does not prevent uterine rupture (professional consensus). The increased risk of uterine rupture associated with oxytocin use is dose-dependent (LE3). In the active phase, it is recommended that the total duration of failure to progress should not exceed 3h; at that point, a cesarean should be performed (professional consensus). Epidural analgesia must be encouraged. The simple existence of a uterine scar is not an indication for a routine manual uterine examination after VBAC (grade C).

Sentilhes L ，Vayssière C ，Beucher G ，Deneux-Tharaux C ，Deruelle P ，Diemunsch P ，Gallot D ，Haumonté JB ，Heimann S ，Kayem G ，Lopez E ，Parant O ，Schmitz T ，Sellier Y ，Rozenberg P ，d'Ercole C ... -  《-》

Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.

Landon MB ，Spong CY ，Thom E ，Hauth JC ，Bloom SL ，Varner MW ，Moawad AH ，Caritis SN ，Harper M ，Wapner RJ ，Sorokin Y ，Miodovnik M ，Carpenter M ，Peaceman AM ，O'sullivan MJ ，Sibai BM ，Langer O ，Thorp JM ，Ramin SM ，Mercer BM ，Gabbe SG ，National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network ... -  《OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY》

Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery.

The objective of the study was to assess the outcome of trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery (OVD). A retrospective study of all women who underwent cesarean section (CS) because of a failed OVD in a tertiary medical center between 1996 and 2011. Women who had a subsequent delivery were identified, and the outcome of subsequent delivery was analyzed. Overall, 533 women underwent CS because of failed OVD during the study period. A total of 204 women (38.3%) had a subsequent delivery, of whom 93 (45.6%) had a TOLAC and 111 (54.4%) had a repeat elective CS. The success rate in the TOLAC group was 61.3% (n = 57). The most common indication for repeat CS was lack of progress (72.3%) among the 36 women in whom TOLAC failed (38.7%). The rate of postpartum hemorrhage and prolonged maternal hospitalization was lower in the TOLAC group than in the repeat CS group (2.2% vs 10.8%, P = .02, and 0% vs 8.1%, P = .005). There were no cases of rupture or dehiscence of the uterine scar. Factors associated with failed TOLAC were the occiput-posterior position and prolonged the second stage as the indication for OVD in the index pregnancy, maternal age older than 30 years at the time of subsequent delivery, and a birthweight in the subsequent pregnancy that is higher than the birthweight in the index pregnancy. TOLAC in women who underwent a previous CS because of a failed OVD is associated with a relatively high success rate compared with the reported success rates among women with past CS during the second stage of labor. This information and the risk factors for TOLAC failure can be used when counseling these women regarding mode of delivery in subsequent pregnancy.

Melamed N ，Segev M ，Hadar E ，Peled Y ，Wiznitzer A ，Yogev Y ... -  《-》