Elutax paclitaxel-eluting balloon followed by bare-metal stent compared with Xience V drug-eluting stent in the treatment of de novo coronary stenosis: a randomized trial.

Paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEBs) are a promising alternative to drug-eluting stent (DES) in the treatment of coronary stenoses. The aim of our study was to compare the 9-month restenosis rates of a strategy of predilatation with PEB followed by bare-metal CoCr stent (PEB + BMS group) versus implantation of everolimus DES (DES group). This randomized, single-center study planned to enroll 366 patients with stable angina (183 patients per arm) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a de novo, native coronary artery stenosis ≤ 15 mm in length. Primary end point, in a noninferiority study design, was 9-month binary angiographic restenosis. A frequency-domain optical coherence tomography substudy investigated the percentage of uncovered stent struts per lesion, the percentage of malapposed/uncovered struts per lesion, and the percentage of net volume obstruction at 9-month follow-up among the first consecutive 30 patients enrolled in the PEB + BMS group. The study was prematurely halted after enrollment of 125 patients, 59 in the PEB + BMS group and 66 in the DES group, because of excess of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization in the PEB + BMS group. When all the enrolled patients completed their follow-up, IDLTR rates were 14% in the PEB + BMS versus 2% in DES group (P = .001). Binary restenosis, either in-stent or in-segment, was significantly higher in the PEB + BMS compared with DES group (17% vs 3% [P = .01] and 25% vs 4% [P = .009] respectively). Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated important neointimal regrowth in the PEB + BMS group, similar to historical BMS data. In the treatment of de novo coronary stenosis, a strategy of predilatation with PEB before BMS implantation was significantly inferior to implantation of an everolimus DES stent in terms of 9-month target lesion revascularization. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography data confirm the lack of efficacy of this strategy.

Liistro F ，Porto I ，Angioli P ，Grotti S ，Ducci K ，Falsini G ，Bolognese L ... -  《-》

Stent coverage and neointimal proliferation in bare metal stents postdilated with a Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stents: prospective randomized study using optical coherence tomography at 6-month follow-up.

In this randomized trial, strut coverage and neointimal proliferation of a therapy of bare metal stents (BMSs) postdilated with the paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (DEB) was compared with everolimus drug-eluting stents (DESs) at 6-month follow-up using optical coherence tomography. We hypothesized sufficient stent coverage at follow-up. A total of 105 lesions in 90 patients were treated with either XIENCE V DES (n=51) or BMS postdilated with the SeQuent Please DEB (n=54). At follow-up, comparable results on the primary optical coherence tomography end point (percentage uncovered struts 5.64±9.65% in BMS+DEB versus 4.93±9.29% in DES; P=0.366) were found. Thus, BMS+DEB achieved the prespecified noninferiority margin of 5% uncovered struts versus DES (difference between treatment means, 0.71%; one-sided upper 95% confidence interval, 4.14%; noninferiority P=0.04). Optical coherence tomography analysis showed significantly more global neointimal proliferation in the BMS+DEB group (15.7±7.8 versus 11.0±5.2 mm(3) proliferation volume/cm stent length; P=0.002). No significant focal in-stent stenosis analyzed with angiography (percentage diameter stenosis at follow-up, 22.8±11.9 versus 16.9±10.4; P=0.014) and optical coherence tomography (peak local area stenosis, 39.5±13.8% versus 36.8±15.6%; P=0.409) was found. Good stent strut coverage of >94% was found in both therapy groups. Despite greater suppression of global neointimal growth in DES, both DES and BMS+DEB effectively prevented clinically relevant focal restenosis at 6-month follow-up. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01056744.

Poerner TC ，Otto S ，Gassdorf J ，Nitsche K ，Janiak F ，Scheller B ，Goebel B ，Jung C ，Figulla HR ... -  《-》

First results of the DEB-AMI (drug eluting balloon in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial: a multicenter randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon plus bare-metal stent versus bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in primary p

The goal of this study was to compare angiographic, intravascular imaging, and functional parameters, as well as the clinical outcomes of patients treated with drug-eluting balloon (DEB) plus bare-metal stent (BMS) versus BMS versus drug-eluting stent (DES) for ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). Concerns remain regarding the long-term safety of DES in STEMI. DEB could provide an attractive alternative in order to achieve potentially similar effectiveness but limiting the long-term hazards related to late-acquired stent malapposition and thus stent thrombosis. In this randomized, international, 2-center, single-blinded, 3-arm study, STEMI patients were randomly assigned to group A: BMS; group B: DEB plus BMS; or group C: DES after successful thrombus aspiration. The primary endpoint was 6-month angiographic in-stent late-luminal loss. Secondary endpoints were in-stent binary restenosis, major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization). In a subgroup of patients, stent (mal)apposition (by optical coherence tomography) and endothelial function (by acetylcholine infusion) was assessed. Overall, 150 patients were randomized. Procedural success was achieved in 96.7%. In groups A, B, and C, respectively, late-luminal loss was 0.74 ± 0.57 mm, 0.64 ± 0.56 mm, and 0.21 ± 0.32 mm (p < 0.01); binary restenosis was 26.2%, 28.6%, and 4.7% (p = 0.01); and MACE rates were 23.5%, 20.0%, and 4.1% (p = 0.02), respectively. The median percentage [25th to 75th interquartile range] of uncovered and malapposed stent struts per lesion was 0 [0 to 0.35], 2.84 [0 to 6.63], and 5.21 [3.25 to 14.5] (p < 0.01). Significant paradoxical vasoconstriction was seen in groups B and C. In STEMI patients, DEB followed by BMS implantation failed to show angiographic superiority to BMS only. Angiographic results of DES were superior to both BMS and DEB. Moreover, DEB before implantation induced more uncovered and malapposed stent struts than BMS, but less than after DES. (Drug-Eluting Balloon in Acute Myocardial Infarction [DEB-AMI]; NCT00856765).

Belkacemi A ，Agostoni P ，Nathoe HM ，Voskuil M ，Shao C ，Van Belle E ，Wildbergh T ，Politi L ，Doevendans PA ，Sangiorgi GM ，Stella PR ... -  《-》

A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-elutin

This study sought to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) with that of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR). Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge. This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing DEB with EES in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary endpoint was the minimal lumen diameter at 9 months' follow-up. A total of 189 patients with BMS-ISR from 25 Spanish sites were included (95 were allocated to DEB and 94 to EES). Procedural success was achieved in all patients. At late angiography (median 249 days; 92% of eligible patients), patients in the EES arm had a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter (2.36 ± 0.6 mm vs. 2.01 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001; absolute mean difference: 0.35 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16 to 0.53) and a lower percent of diameter stenosis (13 ± 17% vs. 25 ± 20%, p < 0.001). However, late loss (0.04 ± 0.5 mm vs. 0.14 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.14) and binary restenosis rate (4.7% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.22) were very low and similar in both groups. Clinical follow-up (median 365 days) was obtained in all (100%) patients. Occurrences of the combined clinical outcome measure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization; 6% vs. 8%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.18, p = 0.6) and the need for target vessel revascularization (2% vs. 6%; HR: 0.32: 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.59, p = 0.17) were similar in the 2 groups. In patients with BMS-ISR, both DEB and EES provided excellent clinical results with a very low rate of clinical and angiographic recurrences. However, compared with DEB, EES provide superior late angiographic findings. (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs. Everolimus-eluting Stent [RIBS V]; NCT01239953).

Alfonso F ，Pérez-Vizcayno MJ ，Cárdenas A ，García Del Blanco B ，Seidelberger B ，Iñiguez A ，Gómez-Recio M ，Masotti M ，Velázquez MT ，Sanchís J ，García-Touchard A ，Zueco J ，Bethencourt A ，Melgares R ，Cequier A ，Dominguez A ，Mainar V ，López-Mínguez JR ，Moreu J ，Martí V ，Moreno R ，Jiménez-Quevedo P ，Gonzalo N ，Fernández C ，Macaya C ，RIBS V Study Investigators, under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology ... -  《-》

Optical coherence tomography assessment of in vivo vascular response after implantation of overlapping bare-metal and drug-eluting stents.

We designed a randomized trial exploiting optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess coverage and apposition of overlapping bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in human coronary arteries. Overlapping DES impair healing in animals. Optical coherence tomography allows accurate in vivo assessment of stent strut coverage and apposition. Seventy-seven patients with long coronary stenoses were randomized to overlapping sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), or BMS. The primary goal of the study was to determine the rate of uncovered/malapposed struts in overlap versus nonoverlap segments, according to stent type, at 6-month follow-up with OCT. A total of 53,047 struts were analyzed. The rate of uncovered/malapposed struts was 1.5 +/- 3.4% and 0.6 +/- 2.7% in overlap versus nonoverlap BMS (p = NS), respectively, and 4.3 +/- 11% and 3.6 +/- 8% in overlap versus nonoverlap DES (p = NS), respectively. There were no differences in the rates of uncovered/malapposed struts between overlapping BMS and DES, likely due to low frequency of uncovered/malapposed struts in ZES (0.1 +/- 0.4%), which offset the higher rates observed in SES (6.7 +/- 9.6%) and PES (6.7 +/- 16.5%, p < 0.05). Overlap segments showed greater neointimal volume obstruction versus nonoverlap segments in all DES (p < 0.05 for all DES types). Strut-level neointimal thickness at overlap and nonoverlap segments were lowest in SES (0.16 +/- 0.1 mm and 0.12 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively) compared with PES (0.27 +/- 0.1 mm and 0.20 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively), ZES (0.40 +/- 0.16 mm and 0.33 +/- 0.13 mm, respectively), and BMS (0.55 +/- 0.31 mm and 0.53 +/- 0.25 mm, respectively, p < 0.05). As assessed by OCT the impact of DES on vascular healing was similar at overlapping and nonoverlapping sites. However, strut malapposition, coverage pattern, and neointimal hyperplasia differ significantly according to DES type. (Optical Coherence Tomography for Drug Eluting Stent Safety [ODESSA]; NCT00693030).

Guagliumi G ，Musumeci G ，Sirbu V ，Bezerra HG ，Suzuki N ，Fiocca L ，Matiashvili A ，Lortkipanidze N ，Trivisonno A ，Valsecchi O ，Biondi-Zoccai G ，Costa MA ，ODESSA Trial Investigators ... -  《-》