Repair of retrograde ascending dissection after descending stent grafting.

Retrograde dissection is now recognized as an important complication after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), but its treatment is poorly understood. Our objectives were to investigate the risks, describe the repair methods, and assess the outcomes of this complication. From 2000 to 2012, 766 patients underwent TEVAR. Of these patients, 14 (1.8%), plus 1 who had undergone TEVAR elsewhere (n = 15), developed retrograde dissection after stent grafting. They had undergone TEVAR for distal aortic dissection in 7, intramural hematoma in 5, aneurysm in 2, and transection in 1. Their mean age was 65 ± 9 years. At the initial TEVAR, the left subclavian artery was covered in 9, the mean stent graft diameter was 34 ± 2 mm, and >1 device was used in 8 patients. The site of entry tear was at the greater curvature in 11 and lesser curvature in 4. One patient ruptured and died 12 days after TEVAR and never made it to the operating room. The other 14 underwent proximal aortic repair. The median interval between TEVAR and repair of retrograde dissection was 6 months; 3 patients presented within 1 month. The repair techniques included reverse frozen elephant trunk in 5, total arch repair in 4, ascending or hemiarch repair in 4, and ascending TEVAR in 1. Concomitant procedures included aortic valve repair in 4, replacement in 2, root remodeling in 1, and coronary bypass in 1. No operative mortality occurred. One patient underwent reoperation for bleeding. Two required a tracheostomy for respiratory failure. However, no renal failure, stroke, or spinal injury occurred. At a median follow-up of 26 months, 4 aortic reoperations had occurred: 1 distal stent graft extension for type 1b endoleak, 2 hybrid thoracoabdominal completion repairs for growth of residual distal disease, and 1 emergency TEVAR for aortobronchial fistula. The latter patient died of septic complications, and 3 other late noncardiac deaths occurred. Retrograde ascending dissection can present as an early or a late complication after descending stent grafting because of aortic instability or disease progression and has usually been associated with descending dissection or intramural hematoma. It is a life-threatening complication that can be managed safely with early recognition and rapid delivery of open or hybrid repair.

Idrees J ，Arafat A ，Johnston DR ，Svensson LG ，Roselli EE ... -  《-》

Retrograde ascending aortic dissection as an early complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Retrograde ascending aortic dissection (rAAD) is a potential complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), yet little data exist regarding its occurrence. This study examines the incidence, etiology, and outcome of this event. A prospective institutional database was used to identify cases of acute rAAD following TEVAR from a cohort of 309 consecutive procedures from March 2005 (date of initial Food and Drug Administration approval) to September 2010. The database was analyzed for the complication of rAAD as well as relevant patient and operative variables. The incidence of rAAD was 1.9% (6/309); all cases occurred with proximal landing zone in the ascending aorta and/or arch (zones 0-2). All were identified in the perioperative period (range, 0-6 days) with 33% (2/6) 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Eighty-three percent (5/6) underwent emergent repair; one patient died without repair. rAAD patients were similar to the non-rAAD group (n = 303) across pertinent variables, including age, gender, race, and device size (all P > .1). rAAD incidence by aortic pathology was 1.0% (2/200) for aneurysm, 4.4% (4/91) for dissection, and 0% (0/18) for transection; P = .08. rAAD incidence by device was TAG (Gore) 1.0% (2/205), Talent (Medtronic) 4.7% (2/43), and Zenith TX2 (Cook) 3.6% (2/55). rAAD incidence was observed to be higher among patients with an ascending aortic diameter ≥ 4.0 cm (4.8% vs 0.9% for ascending diameter <4.0 cm); P = .047. Incidence was also higher with proximal landing zone in the native ascending aorta (zone 0) 6.9% (2/29) versus 1.4% for all others (4/280); P = .101. For patients with dissection pathology and an ascending aortic diameter ≥ 4.0 cm, 11% (3/28) suffered rAAD; with the combination of native ascending aorta (zone 0) landing zone measuring ≥ 4.0 cm, the incidence was 25% (2/8). Definitive diagnosis was by computed tomography angiography (n = 1), intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (n = 3), intraoperative arteriography (n = 1), or postmortem autopsy (n = 1). rAAD is a lethal early complication of TEVAR, which may be more common when treating dissection, with devices utilizing proximal bare springs or barbs for fixation, with native zone 0 proximal landing zone and with ascending aortic diameter ≥ 4 cm. Combinations of these risk factors may be particularly high risk. Intraoperative imaging assessment of the ascending aorta should be conducted following TEVAR to avoid under-recognition. National database reporting of this complication is needed to ensure safety and proper application of emerging TEVAR technology.

Williams JB ，Andersen ND ，Bhattacharya SD ，Scheer E ，Piccini JP ，McCann RL ，Hughes GC ... -  《-》

Retrograde Type A Dissection after Ascending Aorta Involved Endovascular Repair and Its Surgical Repair with Stented Elephant Trunk.

Retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) is a serious complication after ascending aorta involved endovascular repair (AAIER). We here report our surgical approach to this serious complication. From July 2011 to July 2014, 8 RTADs after AAIER patients received surgical repair in our institution. Data of these RTAD patients were retrospectively collected for further analysis. All patients received urgent surgical repair based on the stented elephant trunk technique. We took 2 different ways to handle the previous stent during operation. In patients who had a prior hybrid aortic repair, we removed the proximal part of the stent while the distal part was left in place. In patients who had prior ascending aorta stent implantation (AASI), the stent was totally removed. The mean age of the patients was 57.6 ± 11.9 years. Regarding the index intervention, 2 patients received hybrid aortic repair and 6 patients received AASI. In patients who received AASI, 1 patient underwent simultaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and another patient received simultaneous chimney technique in innominate artery and left common carotid artery combined with bypass from left subclavian artery to left common carotid artery to cure the type I endoleak induced by the previous implanted TEVAR stent. All patients received a new elephant trunk implantation during surgical repair. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass, selective cerebral perfusion, and aortic cross-clamp time were 172.1 ± 13.3, 40.8 ± 4.2, and 121.8 ± 11.4 min, respectively. The mean intensive care unit time was 7.8 ± 3.4 days. Two patients (25.0%) experienced transient neurologic dysfunction and recovered completely before discharge. In-hospital death rate was 12.5% (1 of 8). The mean follow-up time was 17.1 ± 9.5 months. No late deaths or complications occurred during follow-up. AAIER especially AASI used in aortic dissection treatment should be seriously considered since RTAD might occur. Our study indicated that surgical repair with stented elephant trunk was feasible and according to the cause of RTAD, different surgical strategies should be taken to manage the stent.

An Z ，Tan MW ，Song ZG ，Tang H ，Lu FL ，Xu ZY ... -  《-》

Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using aortic arch chimney stents in high-risk patients.

Aortic arch disease is a challenging clinical problem, especially in high-risk patients, in whom open repair can have morbidity and mortality rates of 30% to 40% and 2% to 20%, respectively. Aortic arch chimney (AAC) stents used during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are a less invasive treatment strategy than open repair, but the current literature is inconclusive about the role of this technology. The focus of this analysis is on our experience with TEVAR and AAC stents. All TEVAR procedures performed from 2002 to 2015 were reviewed to identify those with AAC stents. Primary end points were technical success and 30-day and 1-year mortality. Secondary end points included complications, reintervention, and endoleak. Technical success was defined as a patient's surviving the index operation with deployment of the AAC stent at the intended treatment zone with no evidence of type I or type III endoleak on initial postoperative imaging. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Twenty-seven patients (age, 69 ± 12 years; male, 70%) were identified, and all were described as being at prohibitive risk for open repair by the treating team. Relevant comorbidity rates were as follows: coronary artery disease/myocardial infarction, 59%; oxygen-dependent emphysema, 30%; preoperative creatinine concentration >1.8 mg/dL, 19%; and congestive heart failure, 15%. Presentations included elective (67%; n = 18), symptomatic (26%; n = 7), and ruptured (7%; n = 2). Eleven patients (41%) had prior endovascular or open arch/descending thoracic repair. Indications were degenerative aneurysm (49%), chronic residual type A dissection with aneurysm (15%), type Ia endoleak after TEVAR (11%), postsurgical pseudoaneurysm (11%), penetrating ulcer (7%), and acute type B dissection (7%). Thirty-two brachiocephalic vessels were treated: innominate (n = 7), left common carotid artery (LCCA; n = 24), and left subclavian artery (n = 1). Five patients (19%) had simultaneous innominate-LCCA chimneys. Brachiocephalic chimney stents were planned in 75% (n = 24), with the remainder placed for either LCCA or innominate artery encroachment (n = 8). Overall technical success was 89% (one intraoperative death, two persistent type Ia endoleaks in follow-up). The 30-day mortality was 4% (n = 1; intraoperative death of a patient with a ruptured arch aneurysm), and median length of stay was 6 (interquartile range, 4-9) days. Seven (26%) patients experienced a major complication (stroke, three [all with unplanned brachiocephalic chimney]; respiratory failure, three; and death, one). Nine (33%) patients underwent aorta-related reintervention, and no chimney occlusion events occurred during follow-up (median follow-up, 9 [interquartile range, 1-23] months). The 1-year and 3-year survival is estimated to be 88% ± 6% and 69% ± 9%, respectively. TEVAR with AAC can be performed with high technical success and acceptable morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients. Unplanned AAC placement during TEVAR results in an elevated stroke risk, which may be related to the branch vessel coverage necessitating AAC placement. Acceptable midterm survival can be anticipated, but aorta-related reintervention is not uncommon, and diligent follow-up is needed.

Voskresensky I ，Scali ST ，Feezor RJ ，Fatima J ，Giles KA ，Tricarico R ，Berceli SA ，Beck AW ... -  《-》

Endovascular stent grafting for ascending aorta repair in high-risk patients.

Standard treatment of ascending aortic pathology is open repair, but some patients are too high risk. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of the ascending aorta has been used as an alternative. Our objectives were to characterize patients, describe repair methods, and assess outcomes. From 2006 to 2014, 22 patients underwent supracoronary ascending TEVAR for acute Type A dissection (n = 9), intramural hematoma (n = 2), pseudoaneurysm (n = 9), chronic dissection (n = 2), or aorta-cardiac fistula (n = 2). Mean age was 71 ± 13 years and the maximum proximal aortic diameter was 6 ± 1 cm. Devices were delivered via a transfemoral (n = 10), transapical (n = 7), or axillary (n = 5) artery approach. The proximal landing zone was at the sinotubular junction in 14 patients, mid to distal ascending aorta in 3 patients, and surgical graft from previous ascending repair in 5 patients. More than 1 device was used in 15 patients. Imaging and engineering analysis was performed for all patients. There were 3 hospital deaths (13.6%) (tamponade in 1 patient, bleed from left atrial fistula in another patient). One patient had partial occlusion of the left coronary artery requiring open conversion and died later from multiorgan failure. One patient required early open conversion for retained delivery system. There were 3 strokes, 2 myocardial infarctions, and 2 tracheostomies, but there was no new-onset renal failure. Median follow-up was 12 months. Six patients developed type 1 endoleak: 2 were treated endovascularly, 1 with open repair, 1 resolved, 1 refused treatment, and 1 is being watched. In 2 patients, initial TEVAR was performed as a bridge for ruptured high-risk dissection and were later converted to open repair. Reoperations also included removal of stent graft due to distal migration and repair of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. There were 3 late deaths. Actual survival at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years was 86%, 80%, and 75%, respectively. Ascending TEVAR is a feasible alternative to medical therapy for repair of acute and chronic ascending disease in high-risk patients. Development of devices dedicated to treat ascending aortic pathology is needed to improve outcomes.

Roselli EE ，Idrees J ，Greenberg RK ，Johnston DR ，Lytle BW ... -  《-》