The management of endograft infections following endovascular thoracic and abdominal aneurysm repair.

The management of infected aortic endografts is a challenging endeavor. Treatment of this problem has not been well defined as it is fairly uncommon. However, the incidence is increasing. This study examines the results of treatment at a single center for this morbid process. A retrospective review was performed of patients treated for infected abdominal or thoracic endograft infection following previous abdominal or thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. Data was reviewed for patient demographics, details of initial endograft implantation, presentation and timeline of subsequent infection, management of infected grafts, and outcomes during follow-up. Overall, 18 patients were treated for infected endografts (thoracic: six, abdominal:12). Three patients were treated between 2000 and 2006, corresponding to a 0.6% institutional incidence of endograft infection (3/473). There were no transfers for infected endografts from outside institutions. From 2006 to 2011, 15 patients underwent treatment. Six were institutional cases of infections (6/945, 0.6% infection rate), however, there was an increase in transfers (n = 9). Median time to presentation with infection from endograft implant was 90 days, with over one-half (61%) presenting within the first 3 months. Tissue and/or blood cultures were positive in 12/16 growing Escherichia coli (n = 1), group A streptococcus (n = 3), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), or polymicrobial infections (n = 7). The other four patients were culture negative with computed tomography evidence of gas surrounding the endograft and clinical sepsis. Ten patients (abdominal: eight, thoracic: two) were treated with endograft explantation. The remaining eight patients were considered too high-risk for explant or refused open surgery and were therefore managed conservatively without explant (abdominal: four, thoracic: four). At a mean follow-up of 24.7 months, aneurysm-related mortality was 38.9% (n = 7) and was higher for patients presenting with aortoenteric or aortobronchial fistulas (n = 6/10, 60%) (P = .04) and for thoracic stent infections (n = 5/6; 83%) (P = .03). The only survivor of a thoracic infection was managed surgically. Overall survival for patients with abdominal endografts (n = 12) was similar between the eight patients managed surgically (n = 6/8; 75%) and the four selected for medical management (n = 4/4; 100%) (P = .39). All survivors remain on long-term suppressive antibiotics. Two additional patients died of unrelated causes during follow-up. Endograft infection is a rare but increasing complication after abdominal or thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair, which carries significant associated morbidity and mortality. Most endograft infections occurred in proximity to other types of infection, suggesting that bacterial seeding of the endograft was the source. Aortoenteric and aortobronchial fistulas are common presentations, which portend a significantly worse prognosis. Thoracic endograft infections, which have the highest rate of fistulization, have the worst outcomes. Surgical excision continues to be standard of care but conservative management with intravenous antibiotics may be of benefit in certain patients with abdominal endograft infections.

Murphy EH ，Szeto WY ，Herdrich BJ ，Jackson BM ，Wang GJ ，Bavaria JE ，Fairman RM ，Woo EY ... -  《-》

The relevance of aortic endograft prosthetic infection.

Vascular prosthetic graft infection is a severe complication after open aortic aneurysm repair. Reports of infected endografts are scarce. General treatment consensus with infected graft material is that it should be removed completely. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of endograft infection after endovascular repair of abdominal (EVAR) and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TEVAR) and to report treatment options and their outcome. A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients endovascularly operated for abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysm in two large hospitals (one tertiary referral center and one large community hospital) between March 1996 and June 2009. Diagnosis of infected endograft was made based on clinical findings, blood tests and cultures, imaging studies (computed tomography, fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography), and intraoperative findings at reoperation. Eleven patients with an infected endograft were identified in 1431 endovascular procedures. One other patient was referred from another hospital. Patients were aged 68 ± 9 years, and all but one were male. The median time from initial TEVAR/EVAR to the diagnosis of infection was 115 days (range, 7-3748 days), with 42% of patients presenting within 3 months after TEVAR/EVAR. Seven patients were diagnosed with endograft infection after elective TEVAR/EVAR and five after emergency TEVAR/EVAR. The incidence was significantly higher in patients that were treated in an emergency setting (0.56% vs 2.79%; P = .002), while there was no significant difference between TEVAR and EVAR procedures (1.37% vs 0.77%). All patients were initially treated with antibiotic therapy, which was complemented with surgical intervention in six patients. In four patients, the infected graft material was completely explanted. Isolated microorganisms included Staphylococcus species (n = 4), Streptococcus species (n = 4), Enterobacter cloacae (n = 1), Escherichia coli (n = 1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1), and Listeria monocytogenes (n = 1). Median time of follow-up was 201 days (range, 6-2023 days). During the study period, three out of 12 patients died, of which two were treated conservatively (P = ns). At their last follow-up visit, seven of nine patients still used antimicrobial therapy. The incidence of endograft infection is below 1%, with a mortality rate of 25%. Although consensus is that infected graft material should always be removed, this study shows no significant difference in mortality between the conservatively- and the surgically-managed group, possibly related to the small sample size. There may be a role for conservative treatment in selected cases of patients with an infected endograft.

Cernohorsky P ，Reijnen MM ，Tielliu IF ，van Sterkenburg SM ，van den Dungen JJ ，Zeebregts CJ ... -  《-》

Graft infection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Although the natural history and management of infected open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is well described, only sporadic case reports have described the fate of patients with infected endografts placed in the abdominal aorta. The present study describes a tertiary referral center's experience with infected endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs). The medical records of 1302 open and endovascular aortic procedures were queried from January 2000 to January 2010. The cases were reviewed for prior aortic procedures, prosthetic implants, and etiology of current open procedure. Demographics, operative details, and perioperative courses were documented. Nine patients (1 woman) with a mean age of 71 years had an EVAR that later required an open procedure for explantation and surgical revision for suspected infection. All grafts were explanted through a midline transperitoneal approach, with a mean time to explant of 33 months. The explanted endografts included 4 Zenith (Cook, Bloomington, Ind), 2 Ancure (Endovascular Technologies, Menlo Park, Calif), 2 Excluders (Gore, Flagstaff, Ariz), and 1 AneuRx (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn). Eight of the nine original EVARs were performed at other hospitals; 1 patient had EVAR and open explant at the University of Michigan. All patients had preoperative computed tomography scans, except one who was transferred in extremis with a gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Three patients also had a tagged leukocyte scan, and two had magnetic resonance imaging to further reinforce the suspicion of infection before explantation and bypass planning. Rifampin-soaked Hemashield (Boston Scientific) in situ grafts were used in four patients, with extra-anatomic (axillary-bifemoral) bypass used in the other five. The in situ group had no positive preoperative or postoperative cultures, with the exception of the unstable patient who died the day of surgery. For the other five patients, positive tissue cultures were found for Bacteroides, Escherichia coli, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Candida. Three patients were found to have aortic-enteric fistula, two of whom died before discharge from the hospital. The remaining seven survived to discharge. Average length of stay was 22 days, with a median follow-up of 11 months. This series of infected EVARs is the largest group of infected AAA endografts reported to date. Because EVAR of AAAs is presently the most common method of repair, development of endograft infection, while rare, can be managed with acceptable mortality rates. Patients presenting with aortic-enteric fistula after EVAR appear to have a more virulent course.

Laser A ，Baker N ，Rectenwald J ，Eliason JL ，Criado-Pallares E ，Upchurch GR Jr ... -  《-》

Treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with infected aortic endografts.

Endovascular abdominal (EVAR) and thoracic (TEVAR) endografts allow aneurysm repair in high-risk patients, but infectious complications may be devastating. We reviewed treatment and outcomes in patients with infected aortic endografts. Twenty-four patients were treated between January 1997 and July 2012. End points were mortality, morbidity, graft-related complications, or reinfection. Twenty males and four females with median age of 70 years (range, 35-80 years) had 21 infected EVARs and 3 TEVARs. Index repairs performed at our institution included eight EVARs and two TEVARs (10/1300; 0.77%). There were 19 primary endograft infections, 4 graft-enteric fistulae, and 1 aortobronchial fistula. Median time from repair to presentation was 11 months (range, 1-102 months); symptoms were fever in 17, abdominal pain in 11, and psoas abscess in 3. An organism was identified in 19 patients (8 mono- and 11 polymicrobial); most commonly Staphylococcus in 12 and Streptococcus in 6. All but one patient had successful endograft explantation. Abdominal aortic reconstruction was in situ repair in 21 (15 rifampin-soaked, 2 femoral vein, and 4 cryopreserved) and axillobifemoral bypass in three critically ill patients. Infected TEVARs were treated with rifampin-soaked grafts using hypothermic circulatory arrest. Early mortality (30 days or in-hospital) was 4% (n = 1). Morbidity occurred in 16 (67%) patients (10 renal, 5 wound-related, 3 pulmonary, and 1 had a cardiac event). Median hospital stay was 14 days (range, 6-78 days). One patient treated with in situ rifampin-soaked graft had a reinfection with fatal anastomotic blowout on day 44. At 14 months median follow-up (range, 1-82 months), patient survival, graft-related complications, and reinfection rates were 79%, 13%, and 4%, respectively. Endograft explantation and in situ reconstruction to treat infections can be performed safely. Extra-anatomic bypass may be used in high-risk patients. Resection of all infected aortic wall is recommended to prevent anastomotic breakdown. Despite high early morbidity, the risk of long-term graft-related complications and reinfections is low.

Fatima J ，Duncan AA ，de Grandis E ，Oderich GS ，Kalra M ，Gloviczki P ，Bower TC ... -  《-》

Outcome after preservation of infected abdominal aortic endografts.

Moulakakis KG ，Sfyroeras GS ，Mylonas SN ，Mantas G ，Papapetrou A ，Antonopoulos CN ，Kakisis JD ，Liapis CD ... -  《-》