Radiotherapy boost dose-escalation for invasive breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: 2093 patients treated with a prospective margin-directed policy.

To investigate the outcome of invasive early breast cancer patients that underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), treated with a prospective margin-directed institutional policy for RT boost dose, based on final margins status (FMS). A total of 2093 patients were treated between 2000 and 2008. 10 Gy boost was prescribed in case of FMS>5mm; 16 Gy boost with FMS between 2 and 5mm; 20 Gy boost in case of FMS<2mm or positive. After a median follow up of 5.2 years, we recorded 41 local relapse (LR, 2%). Concerning LR free survival, age at diagnosis, nuclear grade, hormonal status, T-stage, adjuvant hormonal therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy emerged as significant parameters (p-values from log rank test <0.05). FMS, that directed the RT boost dose, did not have significant impact on LRFS (p=0.46). LR rates were 2.3% for FMS<2mm, 2.6% for 2-5mm FMS and 1.8% for FMS>5mm. At multivariate analysis, higher nuclear grade (p=0.045), triple negative subtype (p=0.036) and higher T-stage (p=0.02) resulted as the independent predictors of LR occurrence. Our experience showed that a margin-directed policy of RT boost dose-escalation seems to reduce the negative impact of FMS on LR, but it is not able to overcome the unfavorable effect of higher nuclear grade, higher T stage and triple negative subtype.

Livi L ，Meattini I ，Franceschini D ，Saieva C ，Meacci F ，Marrazzo L ，Gerlain E ，Desideri I ，Scotti V ，Nori J ，Sanchez LJ ，Orzalesi L ，Bonomo P ，Greto D ，Bianchi S ，Biti G ... -  《-》

Long-term follow-up of a prospective policy of margin-directed radiation dose escalation in breast-conserving therapy.

A prospectively applied treatment policy for breast-conserving therapy used margin assessment as the exclusive guide to the intensity of radiation therapy directed at the tumor bed. From 1982 to 1994, 498 women with 509 Stage I/II breast carcinomas with a median follow-up of 121 months were treated. Final margin status (FMS) categories were defined as greater than 5 mm, greater than 2-5 mm, greater than 0-2 mm, and positive. For margins less than or equal to 2 mm or indeterminate, reexcisions were performed if feasible. All patients received whole breast irradiation to 50.0-50.4 Gy. Final tumor bed boosts as a function of FMS were as follows: no residual on reexcision, no boost performed; FMS greater than 5 mm, boost of 10 Gy; FMS greater than 2-5 mm, boost of 14 Gy; FMS greater than 0-2 mm or positive, boost of 20 Gy. Cases were analyzed for local failure with respect to histology, age, tumor size, excision volume, reexcision, and total dose. FMS was positive, greater than 0-2 mm, greater than 2-5 mm, and greater than 5 mm, and no residual tumor on reexcision in 21%, 20%, 17%, 14%, and 28% of cases, respectively. At 12 years, Kaplan-Meier local failure rates were 17% for FMS positive, 9% for FMS greater than 0-2 mm, 5% for FMS greater than 2-5 mm, 0% for FMS greater than 5 mm, and 6% for specimens without evidence of residuum on reexcision (P = 0.009). Patients 45 years old and younger had a 12-year local failure rate of 15% whereas patients older than 45 years had a 12-year local failure rate of 6% (P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, young age (P = 0.03) predicted increased local failure rate, whereas margins that were less than or equal to 2 mm or positive predicted late (> 5 years) but not early (< or = 5 years) recurrence (P = 0.003). Graded tumor bed dose escalation in response to FMS results in very low rates of local failure over the first 5 years for all FMS categories. However, tumors with close/positive margins have significantly increased local failure rates after 5 years of follow-up even with increased radiation boost dose. In addition, graded tumor bed dose escalation does not fully overcome the adverse influence of young age.

Neuschatz AC ，DiPetrillo T ，Safaii H ，Price LL ，Schmidt-Ullrich RK ，Wazer DE ... -  《-》

Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy.

(1) To examine the effect of surgical margin status on local recurrence (LR) and survival following breast-conserving therapy; (2) To identify subsets with close or positive margins with high LR risk despite whole breast radiotherapy (RT) plus boost. Subjects were 2,264 women with pT1-3, any N, M0 invasive breast cancer, treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast ± boost RT. Five-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) LR, breast cancer-specific and overall survival (BCSS and OS) were compared between cohorts with negative (n = 1,980), close (n = 222), and positive (n = 62) margins. LR rates were analyzed according to clinicopathologic characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression modeling and matched analysis of close/positive margin cases and negative margin controls were performed. Median follow-up was 5.2 years. Boost RT was used in 92% of patients with close or positive margins. Five-year KM LR rates in the negative, close and positive margin cohorts were 1.3%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). BCSS and OS were similar in the three margin subgroups. In the close/positive margin cohort, LR rates were 10.2% with age <45 years, 11.8% with Grade III, 11.3% with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and 26.3% with ≥4 positive nodes. Corresponding rates in the negative margin cohort were 2.3%, 2.4%, 1.0%, and 2.4%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort, close or positive margin, Grade III histology, ≥4 positive nodes, and lack of systemic therapy were significantly associated with higher LR risk. When close/positive margin cases were matched to negative margin controls, the difference in 5-year LR remained significant (4.25% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001). On univariable analysis, subsets with close or positive margins, in combination with age <45 years, Grade III, LVI, and ≥4 positive nodes, have 5-year LR >10% despite whole breast plus boost RT. These patients should be considered for more definitive surgery.

Lupe K ，Truong PT ，Alexander C ，Lesperance M ，Speers C ，Tyldesley S ... -  《-》

Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma.

Breast conservative surgery (CS) with radiotherapy (RT) is the most commonly used treatment for early-stage breast carcinoma. However, there is controversy regarding the importance of the pathologic margin status on the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). The current study evaluated the effect of the pathologic margin status on IBTR rates in a cohort of women with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma treated with CS and RT. Between August 1980 and December 1994, 452 women with pathologically lymph node-negative breast carcinoma were treated with CS and RT at Westmead Hospital (Westmead, Australia). Central pathology review was performed for all women. The final margins were negative for 352 women (77.9%), positive (invasive and/or in situ) for 42 women (9.3%), and indeterminate for 58 women (12.8%). Information regarding an extensive intraductal component (EIC), lymphovascular invasion, pathologic tumor size, histologic grade, and nuclear grade was available for most women. After macroscopic total excision of the tumor, all women received whole-breast irradiation (usually 45-50.4 grays [Gy]) and the majority of women also received a local tumor bed boost (range, 8-30 Gy). After a median follow-up of 80 months, 34 women (7.5%) developed an IBTR. The crude 5-year rates of IBTR for women with negative margins, positive margins, and indeterminate margins were 3.1%, 11.9%, and 6.9%, respectively. For women with negative margins, the 5-year and 10-year actuarial rates of freedom from IBTR were 96% and 92%, respectively, compared with 88% and 75%, respectively, for women with positive margins (P = 0.003). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the only factors associated with a significantly higher risk of IBTR were age at diagnosis (P < 0.050) and margin status (P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that both age and margin status were independent predictors of IBTR. None of 24 patients with an EIC and negative margins were found to have developed an IBTR. The results of the current study were comparable to other published reports and supported the association of higher IBTR rates with positive or indeterminate margins compared with negative, pathologic margins. Furthermore, young age (age < 35 years at diagnosis) was associated with the highest risk of IBTR regardless of margin status.

Leong C ，Boyages J ，Jayasinghe UW ，Bilous M ，Ung O ，Chua B ，Salisbury E ，Wong AY ... -  《CANCER》

Role of radiotherapy boost in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a single-center experience in a series of 389 patients.

The use of adjuvant radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ is accepted by most radiation oncologists worldwide; the role of a boost on the tumor bed is however more controversial. We reviewed our Institute experience in DCIS treatment, focusing on main prognostic factors and impact of radiation boost on local relapse. A total of 389 patients treated between 1990 and 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for a median dose of 50 Gy; 190 patients (48.8%) received and additional radiation boost on the tumor bed. At a mean follow up of 7.7 years, we recorded 26 local recurrence (6.7%). Concerning local relapse-free survival, at Cox regression univariate analyses <1 mm surgical margins (p < 0.0001) and young age (p = 0.01) emerged as significant unfavorable prognostic factors. At multivariate analysis Cox regression model, surgical margins (p < 0.001) and radiation boost (p = 0.014) resulted as the significant independent predictors of recurrence. Our experience showed the negative prognostic impact of surgical margins <1 mm and the protective role of radiation boost on LR rate. Anyway, results from ongoing prospective Phase III studies are strongly necessary to better identify high-risk DCIS patients.

Meattini I ，Livi L ，Franceschini D ，Saieva C ，Meacci F ，Marrazzo L ，Bendinelli B ，Scotti V ，De Luca Cardillo C ，Nori J ，Sanchez L ，Orzalesi L ，Bonomo P ，Greto D ，Bucciolini M ，Bianchi S ，Biti G ... -  《-》