Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor.

To assess the reproducibility of measurement of a new sonographic index of fetal head station in labor, the fetal head-symphysis distance (HSD), using three-dimensional ultrasound, and its correlation with digital assessment of fetal head descent and with the angle of progression (AoP). Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volumes were acquired from 47 nulliparous women in active labor following assessment of fetal head station with digital examination. The HSD (the distance between the lower edge of the pubic symphysis and the nearest point of the fetal skull) was measured independently by two operators in order to evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility. The correlation between HSD, AoP and fetal head station was evaluated using regression analysis. Using 3D tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI), measurements of the HSD were obtained in different parasagittal planes to evaluate the influence of inaccurate alignment of the probe with the midline of the pelvis. Measurement of HSD showed high intraobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.995; 95% CI, 0.991-0.997) and interobserver (ICC = 0.991; 95% CI, 0.984-0.995) reliability. In addition, a high correlation was demonstrated between mid-sagittal and parasagittal HSD measurements. HSD showed significant negative correlation with both fetal head station and AoP. Fetal HSD is a simple and reliable method for the assessment of fetal head descent in labor.

Youssef A ，Maroni E ，Ragusa A ，De Musso F ，Salsi G ，Iammarino MT ，Paccapelo A ，Rizzo N ，Pilu G ，Ghi T ... -  《-》

Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor.

Several ultrasound parameters, including intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (ITU) head station, angle of progression (AOP), head-perineum distance (HPD) and head-symphysis distance (HSD), have been suggested to assess fetal head station during labor. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between these ultrasound parameters and to compare them with digital palpation. We analyzed 106 stored volume dataset pairs that had been acquired at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway, from nulliparous women at term with prolonged first stage of labor. The volumes were acquired using a three-dimensional transducer applied between the labia majora in a mid-sagittal plane and perineally in a transverse plane. Digitally palpated head station and cervical dilatation were also noted. The results were compared using regression and correlation coefficients. There were good correlations between ITU head station and HPD (r = 0.71), between ITU head station and HSD (r = 0.74) and between HSD and HPD (r = 0.75). Palpated head station showed only moderate correlation with ITU head station (r = 0.52). Cervical dilatation showed a weak correlation with ITU head station (r = 0.30). The ultrasound parameters showed a high degree of correlation with each other, but only moderate correlation to vaginally palpated fetal head station.

Tutschek B ，Torkildsen EA ，Eggebø TM 《-》

Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.

The objectives of this study were firstly to assess the longitudinal changes of various sonographic parameters of fetal head progression in relation to length of active second stage of labor, and secondly to compare ultrasound findings obtained longitudinally among fetuses with persistent occiput posterior (OP) vs those with persistent occiput anterior (OA) position. From a series of nulliparous low-risk women at term attending the labor ward of our university hospital, transperineal ultrasound volumes were prospectively acquired at the beginning of the active second stage (T1) and at 40-min intervals thereafter until delivery (T2, T3). Sonographic parameters were derived from offline analysis of each volume, including the angle of progression (AoP), progression distance (PD), head-symphysis distance (HSD), head direction (HD) and midline angle. These parameters were compared between patients who delivered within 60 min from the beginning of the active second stage of labor (early delivery) and those who remained undelivered by that time (late delivery). Fetal head position was determined from stored digital images of transabdominal examinations performed at the beginning of the active second stage. Comparison was performed between fetuses with OA and those with persistent OP position at delivery. Spontaneous vaginal delivery was achieved in 58 (81.7%) cases, whereas vacuum extraction and Cesarean section were performed in eight (11.3%) and five (7.0%) cases, respectively. Delivery was achieved within 60 min from the beginning of the active second stage in 44 (62.0%) patients. In the early vs late delivery groups, measurements of AoP, HSD and PD at T1 were significantly different (AoP, 143.9 ± 20.5° vs 125.3 ± 15.0°, P < 0.001; HSD, 14.8 ± 4.5 mm vs 20.9 ± 5.8 mm, P < 0.001; PD, 44.0 ± 14.1 vs 35.0 ± 13.1 mm, P = 0.008). On logistic regression analysis of data obtained at T1, maternal body mass index, oxytocin administration, neonatal birth weight and HSD appeared to predict independently duration of the active second stage. Among fetuses delivering in the OP position (n = 10, 13.5%), Cesarean delivery was significantly more common than in those delivering in the OA position (n = 5 (50.0%) vs n = 2 (3.1%), P = 0.001). Women with persistent OP position compared with OA showed a significantly different AoP at T1 (122 ± 17° vs 138 ± 20°, P = 0.016), HD and HSD at T1 (HD, 112 ± 17 mm vs 86 ± 19 mm, P < 0.001; HSD, 16.5 ± 5.4 mm vs 22.8 ± 6.6 mm, P = 0.008) and at T2 (HD, 120 ± 16 vs 82 ± 27 mm, P = 0.008; HSD, 12.6 ± 3.4 mm vs 18.5 ± 5.4 mm, P = 0.038). AoP, PD and HSD are significantly different between patients undergoing delivery before or after 60 min from the beginning of the active second stage of labor. Ultrasound parameters are among the significant predictors of duration of the active second stage. Moreover, in fetuses persisting in the OP position vs those delivering in the OA position, fetal head progression seems to differ at early phases of the active second stage.

Ghi T ，Maroni E ，Youssef A ，Morselli-Labate AM ，Paccapelo A ，Montaguti E ，Rizzo N ，Pilu G ... -  《-》

Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head-symphysis distance in active labor.

To assess the intermethod agreement between two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound methods in measuring a new index of fetal head station (the fetal head-symphysis distance (HSD)) in active labor, and to assess potential factors that may affect their agreement. HSD was measured by transperineal ultrasound in 86 women in active labor, once using a 2D and once using a 3D technique. 2D images were acquired first in 43 cases and 3D images were acquired first in the other 43 women. Intermethod agreement between 2D and 3D methods was analyzed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. In addition, potential factors affecting the intermethod reproducibility were investigated including fetal occiput position, order of acquisition, fetal head station, stage of labor, maternal body mass index and use of epidural analgesia, using the ANOVA test to check for systematic bias and Levene's test for homoscedasticity. Good agreement was demonstrated between 2D and 3D measurements of HSD (ICC, 0.949 (95% CI, 0.914-0.984)). No evidence of systematic difference was shown between the two methods (average difference ± SD = 0.03 ± 2.29 mm; P = 0.888). The only factor that had a significant effect on systematic difference between 2D and 3D methods was order of acquisition (P = 0.042); the first observation was higher regardless of the method used. Fetal head station had a significant effect on the homogeneity between the two methods (P = 0.004) with a better 2D-3D agreement obtained at lower head stations (SD of differences: 1.63 vs 2.59 mm). There is very good agreement between 2D and 3D methods of assessing HSD. Agreement is better in lower fetal head stations.

Youssef A ，Bellussi F ，Montaguti E ，Maroni E ，Salsi G ，Morselli-Labate AM ，Paccapelo A ，Rizzo N ，Pilu G ，Ghi T ... -  《-》

Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements, obtained from stored ultrasound volumes, related to fetal head progression in the birth canal. From January to September 2009, serial ultrasound volumes were obtained from women in labor, stored and separately evaluated by two different operators using the SonoVCAD™ labor software. Volumes were aligned using the pubic bone and the urethra as references. In the sagittal plane of the pelvis, the following data were calculated: head progression distance (the distance between the infrapubic line and the lowest part of the fetal skull), head direction (the angle between the infrapubic line and the major longitudinal axis of the fetal head) and head progression angle (the angle between the longitudinal axis of the pubic bone and a line joining the lowest edge of the pubis to the lowest convexity of the fetal skull). In the transverse plane, the angle formed by the midline with the anteroposterior axis of the maternal pelvis (midline angle) was also measured. For each measurement, intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was determined. We analyzed 30 ultrasound volumes. For all parameters, interobserver variation was significantly higher than intraobserver variation. Reproducibility was good for all parameters, except for the midline angle. Among the different ultrasound measurements, the progression angle presented the highest reproducibility. Measurements obtained from stored ultrasound volumes to assess fetal head progression in the second stage of labor have good reproducibility, with progression distance and progression angle being the most reproducible parameters.

Ghi T ，Contro E ，Farina A ，Nobile M ，Pilu G ... -  《-》