Activity of single-agent bevacizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma previously treated with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The activity of systemic agents after progression when using vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is poorly characterized. The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab has a broad US Food and Drug Administration label and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline level 2b recommendation in this setting; we thus explored our institutional experience in this population. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC who were treated with bevacizumab in the second- and/or third-line settings; the primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed. Twenty-one patients were treated with bevacizumab: the median age was 63 years old; 80% were white and 14% were black; 80% had clear cell histology. All the patients had prior VEGFR TKI therapy; 43% had prior mTOR inhibitor; the median number of prior therapies was 3. The median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.8-9.6 months), and the median OS was 19.4 months (95% CI, 9.9-NR months). ORR was 9.5%; 52% of subjects had stable disease as best response, and 52% had disease progression. For subjects treated with prior VEGF and mTOR inhibitors, median PFS and OS were 4.4 and 13.2 months, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities included fatigue (29%), dehydration (24%), failure to thrive (10%), constipation (10%), and muscle weakness (10%). Single-agent bevacizumab has acceptable toxicity and moderate disease-stabilizing activity in selected patients with mRCC who have failed prior VEGFR TKI and mTOR inhibitors. These data support clinical benefit to continued ongoing VEGF inhibition. Further prospective studies of bevacizumab alone or with alternative targeted agents in previously treated populations with mRCC are warranted.

Turnbull JD ，Cobert J ，Jaffe T ，Harrison MR ，George DJ ，Armstrong AJ ... -  《-》

A phase II study of bevacizumab and everolimus as treatment for refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Agents that inhibit the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) prolong progression-free survival (PFS), but durable complete responses are rare. Combinations of these cytostatic therapies have great potential to improve efficacy and to escape tumoral resistance mechanisms, but supra-additive toxicity is a valid concern. We investigated whether horizontal blockade with the combination of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to VEGF-A, and of everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, improved PFS in patients with clear cell mRCC who had received prior VEGF blockade. In this phase II investigator-initiated study, 10 of 30 planned patients were enrolled. Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 14 days. Everolimus was orally dosed at 10 mg daily. The patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS. The median age was 55 years. The majority of patients were white men with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (80%) and intermediate risk disease by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center criteria (70%). All the patients had received 1 prior VEGF inhibitor. The median PFS in the 10 evaluable patients was 5.1 months, which was less than the expected historical control of bevacizumab monotherapy at 6 months. The median overall survival was 21 months. The best response was a partial response in 1 patient and stable disease in 9. Forty percent of the patients were discontinued from the study due to toxicity. In our experience, the combination of bevacizumab and everolimus was toxic. The efficacy achieved did not support its combined use over sequential administration. Ongoing randomized studies will definitively evaluate the combination's efficacy and tolerability.

Harshman LC ，Barbeau S ，McMillian A ，Srinivas S ... -  《-》

Retrospective comparison of triple-sequence therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The optimal sequence of targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has not been defined. To describe the efficacy and toxicity of the most common sequences of targeted therapy, namely, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (rTKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi), in different sequences after failure of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling inhibition (VEGFi) in first-line therapy. Retrospective study of 103 patients receiving VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi (n=62) or VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI (n=41) at two German academic centers. Sequence of systemic targeted treatment. Response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 and toxicity was measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of survival were analyzed using Cox regression. Sequence groups did not significantly differ by patient characteristics and response rate following first VEGFi failure. Median PFS for second-line therapy was 4.6 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-5.4), 4.1 mo (95% CI, 3.4-4.9) for rTKI treatment, and 5.4 mo (95% CI, 2.7-8.1) for mTORi treatment (p=0.400). No differences in PFS were observed among third-line therapy groups (3.6 mo for mTORi; 3.7 mo for rTKI). Treatment duration following first VEGFi failure (combined second- and third-line PFS) was 10.0 mo for VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi and 12.2 mo for VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI (p=0.103). No significant differences in OS were observed among sequence groups (33.7 mo [95% CI, 30.4-37.1] for VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi; 38.7 mo [95% CI, 24.4-52.9] for VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI). Primary resistance on first-line therapy was an independent predictor of OS, but type of sequence was not. Limitations are the retrospective design and limited numbers of cases. The sequence therapies VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI and VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi with the currently available agents appear to be equally efficacious in terms of PFS, OS, and response rate, with no apparent beneficial effect with an early use of mTORi.

Busch J ，Seidel C ，Erber B ，Issever AS ，Hinz S ，Kempkensteffen C ，Magheli A ，Miller K ，Grünwald V ，Weikert S ... -  《-》

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) rechallenge for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after treatment failure using both VEGFR-TKI and mTOR inhibitor.

Park I ，Lee JL ，Ahn JH ，Lee DH ，Lee KH ，You D ，Jeong IG ，Song C ，Hong B ，Hong JH ，Ahn H ... -  《-》

Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Subgroup analysis of patients with 1 or 2 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies enrolled in the phase III RECORD-1 study.

In the phase III RECORD-1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00410124), patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who progressed on previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy were randomised 2:1 to everolimus 10mg once daily (n=277) or placebo (n=139). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9months with everolimus and 1.9months with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; P<.001). This preplanned, prospective sub-analysis evaluated PFS benefit of everolimus versus placebo in patients who had previously received 1 or 2 VEGFr-TKIs. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse differences in PFS. All patients (100%) received ⩾1 previous VEGFr-TKI; 26% of patients received 2 previous VEGFr-TKIs. Among patients who received 1 previous VEGFr-TKI, median PFS was 5.4months with everolimus and 1.9months with placebo (HR, 0.32; 95%confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.43; P<.001). Among patients who received 2 previous VEGFr-TKIs, median PFS was 4.0months with everolimus and 1.8months with placebo (HR, 0.32; 95%CI, 0.19-0.54; P<.001). The everolimus safety profile was similar for both groups. Everolimus was associated with prolonged PFS relative to placebo in patients who received 1 or 2 previous VEGFr-TKIs. Patients who received only 1 previous VEGFr-TKI had apparently longer PFS with everolimus in reference to those who received 2 previous VEGFr-TKIs. These results support the use of everolimus as the standard of care in patients who fail initial VEGFr-TKI therapy.

Calvo E ，Escudier B ，Motzer RJ ，Oudard S ，Hutson TE ，Porta C ，Bracarda S ，Grünwald V ，Thompson JA ，Ravaud A ，Kim D ，Panneerselvam A ，Anak O ，Figlin RA ... -  《-》