Bivalirudin versus heparin as an anticoagulant during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case-control study.

Heparin-based anticoagulation for patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has many limitations, including a high risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, little experience with other anticoagulants in these patients has been described. The aim of this study was to compare bivalirudin-based anticoagulation with heparin-based protocols in a population of patients treated with venovenous or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In this case-control study, 10 patients received bivalirudin (cases) and 10 heparin (controls). The target activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was 45 to 60 seconds. None. aPTT variations >20% of the previous value were much more frequent in patients treated with heparin than in patients receiving bivalirudin (52 v 24, p < 0.001). The number of corrections of the anticoagulant dose was higher in the heparin group compared with the bivalirudin group (58 v 51), although it did not reach statistical significance. Bleeding, thromboembolic complications, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support duration, mortality, and the number of episodes of aPTT >80 seconds were not different between the 2 groups. A further analysis was performed in the bivalirudin group according to the presence of acute renal failure requiring continuous venovenous hemofiltration. The median bivalirudin dose in patients with or without hemofiltration was 0.041 (0.028-0.05) mg/kg/h and 0.028 (0-0.041) mg/kg/h, respectively (p = 0.2). Bivalirudin-based anticoagulation may represent a new method of anticoagulation for reducing thromboembolic and bleeding complications, which still jeopardize the application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Moreover, bivalirudin is free from the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Higher doses of bivalirudin may be needed in patients undergoing hemofiltration.

Pieri M ，Agracheva N ，Bonaveglio E ，Greco T ，De Bonis M ，Covello RD ，Zangrillo A ，Pappalardo F ... -  《-》

Bivalirudin in pediatric patients maintained on extracorporeal life support.

Nagle EL ，Dager WE ，Duby JJ ，Roberts AJ ，Kenny LE ，Murthy MS ，Pretzlaff RK ... -  《Pediatric Critical Care Medicine》

Impact of anticoagulation strategy and agents on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy.

Macielak S ，Burcham P ，Whitson B ，Abdel-Rasoul M ，Rozycki A ... -  《-》

Comparison of Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients Requiring Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Heparin Versus Bivalirudin.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a life-sustaining therapy for severe respiratory failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits require systemic anticoagulation that creates a delicate balance between circuit-related thrombosis and bleeding-related complications. Although unfractionated heparin is most widely used anticoagulant, alternative agents such as bivalirudin have been used. We sought to compare extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombosis and bleeding-related outcomes in respiratory failure patients receiving either unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin for anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Retrospective cohort study. Single-center, cardiothoracic ICU. Consecutive patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who were maintained on anticoagulation between 2013 and 2020. IV bivalirudin or IV unfractionated heparin. Primary outcomes were the presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in-circuit-related thrombotic complications and volume of blood products administered during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration. One hundred sixty-two patients receiving unfractionated heparin were compared with 133 patients receiving bivalirudin for anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In patients receiving bivalirudin, there was an overall decrease in the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombotic complications (p < 0.005) and a significant increase in time to circuit thrombosis (p = 0.007). Multivariable Cox regression found that heparin was associated with a significant increase in risk of clots (Exp[B] = 2.31, p = 0.001). Patients who received bivalirudin received significantly less volume of packed RBCs, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet transfusion (p < 0.001 for each). There was a significant decrease in the number major bleeding events in patients receiving bivalirudin, 40.7% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001. Patients receiving bivalirudin for systemic anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation experienced a decrease in the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit-related thrombotic events as well as a significant decrease in volume of blood products administered.

Rivosecchi RM ，Arakelians AR ，Ryan J ，Murray H ，Ramanan R ，Gomez H ，Phillips D ，Sciortino C ，Arlia P ，Freeman D ，Sappington PL ，Sanchez PG ... -  《-》

Heparin vs bivalirudin anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) induces hemostatic alterations that may contribute to hematological complications. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the mainstay antithrombotic in ECMO and depends on antithrombin III (AT III) to exhibit its actions. However, it bears the risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor and is inherently not dependent on AT III. To assess the efficacy and safety profiles of UFH compared with bivalirudin during ECMO support. We retrospectively reviewed 52 adult patients who were supported by ECMO from 1 January 2013 to 1 September 2018. Among them, 33 received UFH and 19 received bivalirudin. We analyzed their 7-day rate of composite thrombotic, bleeding, and mortality episodes while on anticoagulation. There were no statistical differences in the 7-day rate of composite thrombosis (33.3% vs 26.3%; P = 0.60), major bleeding (18.2% vs 5.3%; P = .24), 30-day mortality, (42.4% vs 26.3%; P = .37), or in-hospital mortality (45.5% vs 36.8%; P = .58). The percentage of time activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was within the therapeutic range was higher with bivalirudin (50% vs 85.7%; P = .007). This study suggests that UFH and bivalirudin are associated with similar rates of thrombosis, major bleeding, and mortality events in patients supported by ECMO. However, it was observed that bivalirudin consistently maintained aPTT within the therapeutic range in comparison to UFH.

Kaseer H ，Soto-Arenall M ，Sanghavi D ，Moss J ，Ratzlaff R ，Pham S ，Guru P ... -  《-》