Impact of tricuspid valve annulus dilation on mid-term survival after implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

After left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, right ventricular (RV) failure is a major cause of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Recently, in patients with similar hemodynamic challenge, but less severe RV impairment, who were undergoing surgery for mitral valve repair, concomitant tricuspid valve repair improved post-operative RV re-remodeling in patients with severely dilated tricuspid annuli without tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Pre-operative transesophageal echocardiography and clinical data were prospectively collected from 122 patients without severe TR, who were selected for LVAD implantation. Patients were assigned to one of two groups according to pre-operative tricuspid annulus diameter <43 mm or >43 mm. Groups were compared for parameters that may impact survival after LVAD implantation. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were evaluated for the impact of tricuspid annulus size and right-to-left ventricular diameter ratio (R/L ratio) on 36-month survival. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the pre-operative parameters that independently affected survival. Patients with tricuspid annulus >43 mm presented with higher R/L ratio (0.73 ± 0.21 vs 0.56 ± 0.13; p < 0.00001) and higher proBNP plasma concentration (12,872 ± 13,084 vs 8,988 ± 13,018 pg/ml; p = 0.018). Both R/L ratio >0.72 and tricuspid annulus >43 mm adversely affected survival (p = 0.003 and 0.007, respectively). In the multivariate analysis only tricuspid annulus diameter >43 mm (hazard ratio 2.16, CI 1.21 to 3.84, p = 0.009) and age (hazard ratio 1.03, CI 1.00 to 1.06, p = 0.04) were independent predictors of survival after LVAD. Tricuspid dilation, even without severe regurgitation, adversely affects survival after LVAD implantation. Further studies are required to determine whether concomitant tricuspid valve repair may improve survival in these patients.

Kukucka M ，Stepanenko A ，Potapov E ，Krabatsch T ，Kuppe H ，Habazettl H ... -  《-》

Impact of concomitant cardiac procedures performed during implantation of long-term left ventricular assist devices.

There is a paucity of data evaluating the effect of performing a concomitant cardiac procedure (CCP) on peri-operative survival in patients undergoing implantation of long-term left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The objective of this study was to review our single-institutional experience with patients who underwent a CCP during implantation of a long-term continuous-flow LVAD. From March 2006 through June 2012, 130 patients underwent implantation of a LVAD. Of these, 76 (58.5%) were implanted as bridge-to-transplant and 54 (41.5%) as destination therapy. The LVAD implantation was isolated in 95 patients and with CCP in 35. This included 19 tricuspid valve repairs, 14 aortic valve repair/replacements, and 2 patent foramen ovale closures. The LVAD only and LVAD+CCP groups were compared regarding pre-operative demographics, peri-operative and midterm survival, and the incidence of post-operative complications. Pre-operative central venous pressure (p = 0.047), moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation (p = 0.011), cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.0001), cross-clamp time (p < 0.0001), and right ventricular end diastolic diameter (p = 0.039) were higher in the CCP group. Body mass index (p = 0.01) and body surface area (p = 0.037) were higher in the LVAD-only group. Peri-operative and midterm survival at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 94%, 87%, 80%, and 73%, respectively, for isolated LVAD implants vs. 97%, 90%, 86%, and 86%, respectively, for LVAD+CCP (p = NS). Survival was similar for LVAD patients with tricuspid valve repairs, with aortic valve repair, and with patent foramen ovale repair (p = NS). Cox proportional hazard models showed a CCP was not an independent predictor of outcome (p = NS). CCPs performed during implantation of a long-term continuous-flow LVADs does not increase peri-operative or mid-term mortality. In addition, unlike previous reports, there was no additive procedural risk for patients undergoing concomitant aortic valve repair or replacement.

Morgan JA ，Tsiouris A ，Nemeh HW ，Hodari A ，Karam J ，Brewer RJ ，Paone G ... -  《-》

Impact of concurrent surgical valve procedures in patients receiving continuous-flow devices.

Preexisting valve pathology is common in patients with end-stage heart failure undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. The indications and subsequent benefits of performing valvular procedures in these patients are unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of performing concurrent surgical valve procedures in a large cohort of patients receiving LVADs. One thousand one hundred six patients received the HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD in the bridge to transplant (n = 470) and destination therapy (n = 636) clinical trials. Of these, 374 patients (34%) had concurrent cardiac surgery procedures as follows: 242 patients (21%) with 281 concurrent valve procedures (VP) (aortic 80, mitral 45, and tricuspid 156), and 641 patients had only HMII LVAD. The focus of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing HMII + VP compared with those who received HMII alone. Patients undergoing HMII + VP were significantly older, had higher blood urea nitrogen levels and central venous pressure, and decreased right ventricular stroke work index; intraoperatively, the median cardiopulmonary bypass times were also longer. The unadjusted 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients undergoing HMII + VP (10.3% vs 4.8% for LVAD alone, P = .005). Subgroup analysis of individual VPs showed that higher mortality occurred in patients with HMII plus 2 or more VPs (13.5%, P = .04) followed by trends for increased mortality with HMII plus mitral alone (11.5%, P = NS), HMII plus aortic alone (10.9%, P = NS), and HMII plus tricuspid (8.9%, P = NS) procedures. Of these various groups, only patients undergoing HMII + isolated aortic VP (P = .001) and HMII + multiple VPs (P = .046) had significantly worse long-term survival compared with patients undergoing HMII alone. Right heart failure and right ventricular assist device use was increased in patients undergoing VPs, but there was no difference in the incidence of bleeding or stroke. Patients frequently require concurrent VPs at the time of LVAD placement; these patients are sicker and have higher early mortality. Furthermore, right ventricular dysfunction is increased in these patients. Further studies to develop selection criteria for concurrent valve interventions are important to further improve clinical outcomes.

John R ，Naka Y ，Park SJ ，Sai-Sudhakar C ，Salerno C ，Sundareswaran KS ，Farrar DJ ，Milano CA ... -  《-》

Clinical impact of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures during left ventricular assist device implantation.

Almost 50% of patients referred for implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) have significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Preoperative TR is associated with negative outcomes but the clinical benefit of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures has not been extensively studied. One hundred fifteen patients, undergoing implantable LVADs, were identified as having significant TR by echocardiography prior to their surgical procedure. Patients underwent either LVAD alone (n = 81) versus LVAD plus concomitant tricuspid procedures (n = 34) (29 annuloplasty ring repairs and 5 bioprosthetic replacements.) Preoperative characteristics and hemodynamics, as well as TR severity and clinical outcomes were retrospectively determined from chart and database review and compared for the two groups. Preoperative characteristics and hemodynamics were similar for the two groups. Postoperative TR was markedly reduced for the group undergoing concomitant procedures versus LVAD alone. A temporary right ventricular assist device was required for only one of the 34 cases in which concomitant tricuspid procedures were performed; for patients undergoing LVAD alone, 8 of 81 required right ventricular assist devices. Mean duration of postoperative inotrope utilization was increased for the LVAD alone group versus the group with concomitant tricuspid procedures (10.0 vs 8.0 days, respectively, p = 0.04). The incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction was increased for the LVAD alone group (39%) versus concomitant procedures (21%) (p = 0.05). The LVAD alone group also had a greater mean postimplant length of hospitalization versus the concomitant procedures group (26.0 vs 19.0 days, p = 0.02). Finally, there was a trend toward improved survival for the group with concomitant tricuspid procedures versus LVAD alone. For patients with significant TR undergoing implantable LVAD procedures, concomitant tricuspid procedures are associated with improved early clinical outcomes.

Piacentino V 3rd ，Troupes CD ，Ganapathi AM ，Blue LJ ，Mackensen GB ，Swaminathan M ，Felker GM ，Stafford-Smith M ，Lodge AJ ，Rogers JG ，Milano CA ... -  《-》

Right heart failure and benefits of adjuvant tricuspid valve repair in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

Although right heart failure (RVF) is an important issue in the management of patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), the benefits of performing tricuspid valve repair in conjunction with LVAD implantation have not been demonstrated. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 141 patients who received LVAD implantation as a bridge to transplant from May 1999 to January 2013. We assessed short- and long-term right heart function in 69 of these patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair because of moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) or severe dilatation of the tricuspid annulus. RVF was defined as the need for a right ventricular assist device or >30 days of intravenous inotropic support. TR was graded from 0 to 4, while fibrosis in myocardial biopsy samples was graded pathologically from 0 to 3. The average duration of LVAD support was 595 days. Twenty-seven patients developed RVF and their survival rate was significantly worse than that of patients who did not develop RVF (65 vs 91% at 1 year). RVF was significantly related to high preoperative ratio of central venous pressure (CVP) to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, high total bilirubin, high fibrosis score and high TR grade. In patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair, the TR grade was significantly reduced from 2.6 to 1.0, and this decrease was maintained for 2 years. Although patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair had significantly higher TR grades, ratios of CVP to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and fibrosis scores preoperatively, no survival impairment was seen. Tricuspid valve repair is a useful and durable adjuvant procedure for restoring deteriorated right ventricular function in patients requiring LVAD implantation.

Fujita T ，Kobayashi J ，Hata H ，Seguchi O ，Murata Y ，Yanase M ，Nakatani T ... -  《-》