20 year experience of postoperative radiotherapy in IB-IIA cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors: impact of treatment period and concurrent chemotherapy.

To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors. Between 1990 and 2010, 110 cervical cancer patients with 2 or more intermediate risk factors (deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and large tumor size) underwent adjuvant RT (n=56) or CCRT (n=54) following radical surgery. Because CCRT had been performed since 2000, patients were divided into 3 groups regarding treatment period and the addition of chemotherapy, RT 1990-1999 (n=39), RT 2000-2010 (n=17) and CCRT 2000-2010 (n=54). Majority of concurrent chemotherapeutic regimens were carboplatin and paclitaxel (n=48). Five-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates for RT 1990-1999, RT 2000-2010 and CCRT 2000-2010 were 83.5%, 85.6% and 93.8%, respectively. CCRT 2000-2010 had a significant decrease in pelvic recurrence (p=0.012) and distant metastasis (p=0.027). There were no significant differences in overall survival and RFS between RT 1990-1999 and RT 2000-2010. Acute grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities were more frequently observed in CCRT 2000-2010 (p<0.001). However, acute grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal (GI) and chronic toxicities did not differ between the groups. This study shows that the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to postoperative RT in cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors may improve RFS without increasing acute GI and chronic toxicities, although hematologic toxicities increased significantly.

Song S ，Song C ，Kim HJ ，Wu HG ，Kim JH ，Park NH ，Song YS ，Kim JW ，Kang SB ，Ha SW ... -  《-》

Postoperative adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves survival rates for high-risk, early stage cervical cancer patients.

Ryu HS ，Chun M ，Chang KH ，Chang HJ ，Lee JP ... -  《GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY》

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk factors.

Kim YB ，Cho JH ，Keum KC ，Lee CG ，Seong J ，Suh CO ，Kim GE ... -  《GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY》

Clinical behaviors and outcomes for adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of cervix treated by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

To compare clinical behaviors and treatment outcomes between patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/ASC) of the cervix treated with radical hysterectomy (RH) and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). A total of 318 Stage IB-IIB cervical cancer patients, 202 (63.5%) with SCC and 116 (36.5%) with AC/ASC, treated by RH and adjuvant RT/CCRT, were included. The indications for RT/CCRT were deep stromal invasion, positive resection margin, parametrial invasion, or lymph node (LN) metastasis. Postoperative CCRT was administered in 65 SCC patients (32%) and 80 AC/ASC patients (69%). Patients with presence of parametrial invasion or LN metastasis were stratified into a high-risk group, and the rest into an intermediate-risk group. The patterns of failure and factors influencing survival were evaluated. The treatment failed in 39 SCC patients (19.3%) and 39 AC/ASC patients (33.6%). The 5-year relapse-free survival rates for SCC and AC/ASC patients were 83.4% and 66.5%, respectively (p = 0.000). Distant metastasis was the major failure pattern in both groups. After multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for local recurrence included younger age, parametrial invasion, AC/ASC histology, and positive resection margin; for distant recurrence they included parametrial invasion, LN metastasis, and AC/ASC histology. Compared with SCC patients, those with AC/ASC had higher local relapse rates for the intermediate-risk group but a higher distant metastasis rate for the high-risk group. Postoperative CCRT tended to improve survival for intermediate-risk but not for high-risk AC/ASC patients. Adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor for cervical cancer patients treated by RH and postoperative RT. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy could improve survival for intermediate-risk, but not necessarily high-risk, AC/ASC patients.

Huang YT ，Wang CC ，Tsai CS ，Lai CH ，Chang TC ，Chou HH ，Lee SP ，Hong JH ... -  《-》

Matched-case comparison for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery in FIGO stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer.

To evaluate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery (NCS) is more efficient than primary surgical treatment (PST) for improving clinical outcomes in FIGO stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. We conducted a matched-case comparison where 61 patients treated with NCS were matched to 183 treated with PST. We compared intermediate- and high-risk factors, the need of adjuvant radiotherapy, disease recurrence and survivals between NCS and PST. Patients with ≥2 intermediate- or ≥1 high-risk factors received adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation using cisplatin-based chemotherapy. NCS reduced more definitely intermediate- and high-risk factors than PST in stage IIA disease in spite of little difference of them in stage IB disease (large tumor size, 25% vs. 52.4%; deep stromal invasion, 57.1% vs. 82.1%; lymphovascular space invasion, 35.7% vs. 65.5%; parametrial invasion, 17.9% vs. 41.7%; p<0.05). Moreover, ≥2 intermediate-risk factors were less common in NCS than PST despite no difference of the number of high-risk factors between the 2 treatments, which decreased the need of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with stage IIA disease who received NCS (46.4% vs. 84.5%, p<0.01). Although there were no differences in progression-free survival and disease recurrence between the 2 treatments, NCS led to poorer overall survival than PST in stage IIA disease with no difference of it in stage IB disease. The efficacy between NCS and PST may be similar in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer. However, NCS can lead to poor prognosis despite the reduction of intermediate-risk factors and the need of adjuvant radiotherapy in FIGO stage IIA disease.

Kim HS ，Kim JY ，Park NH ，Kim K ，Chung HH ，Kim YB ，Kim JW ，Kim HJ ，Song YS ，Kang SB ... -  《-》