Cardiorespiratory response to exercise after renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension.

This study sought to investigate the effects of interventional renal sympathetic denervation (RD) on cardiorespiratory response to exercise. RD reduces blood pressure at rest in patients with resistant hypertension. We enrolled 46 patients with therapy-resistant hypertension as extended investigation of the Symplicity HTN-2 (Renal Denervation With Uncontrolled Hypertension) trial. Thirty-seven patients underwent bilateral RD and 9 patients were assigned to the control group. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests were performed at baseline and 3-month follow-up. In the RD group, compared with baseline examination, blood pressure at rest and at maximum exercise after 3 months was significantly reduced by 31 ± 13/9 ± 13 mm Hg (p < 0.0001) and by 21 ± 20/5 ± 14 mm Hg (p < 0.0001), respectively. Achieved work rate increased by 5 ± 13 W (p = 0.029) whereas peak oxygen uptake remained unchanged. Blood pressure 2 min after exercise was significantly reduced by 29 ± 17/8 ± 15 mm Hg (p < 0.001 for systolic blood pressure; p = 0.002 for diastolic blood pressure). Heart rate at rest decreased after RD (4 ± 11 beats/min; p = 0.028), whereas maximum heart rate and heart rate increase during exercise were not different. Heart rate recovery improved significantly by 4 ± 7 beats/min after renal denervation (p = 0.009). In the control group, there were no significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, maximum work rate, or ventilatory parameters after 3 months. RD reduces blood pressure during exercise without compromising chronotropic competence in patients with resistant hypertension. Heart rate at rest decreased and heart rate recovery improved after the procedure. (Renal Denervation With Uncontrolled Hypertension; [Symplicity HTN-2]; NCT00888433).

Ukena C ，Mahfoud F ，Kindermann I ，Barth C ，Lenski M ，Kindermann M ，Brandt MC ，Hoppe UC ，Krum H ，Esler M ，Sobotka PA ，Böhm M ... -  《-》

Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on exercise blood pressure, heart rate, and capacity in patients with resistant hypertension.

Ewen S ，Mahfoud F ，Linz D ，Pöss J ，Cremers B ，Kindermann I ，Laufs U ，Ukena C ，Böhm M ... -  《-》

Effect of renal sympathetic denervation on glucose metabolism in patients with resistant hypertension: a pilot study.

Mahfoud F ，Schlaich M ，Kindermann I ，Ukena C ，Cremers B ，Brandt MC ，Hoppe UC ，Vonend O ，Rump LC ，Sobotka PA ，Krum H ，Esler M ，Böhm M ... -  《-》

Renal denervation in moderate treatment-resistant hypertension.

This study sought to investigate the effect of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension according to the established definition (Joint National Committee VII and European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines), that is, office blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg (with at least three antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic, in adequate doses) and confirmed by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). RDN emerged as an innovative interventional antihypertensive therapy. However, so far, only patients with severe hypertension (systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg or ≥150 mm Hg for patients with type 2 diabetes) have been investigated. In this study, there were 54 patients with moderate treatment-resistant hypertension (office BP ≥140/90 mm Hg and <160/100 mm Hg and diagnosis confirmed by 24-h ABPM of ≥130/80 mm Hg) who underwent catheter-based RDN using the Symplicity catheter (Medtronic Inc., Mountain View, California). Patients were treated with 5.1 ± 1.4 antihypertensive drugs on average. Office BP was significantly reduced by 13/7 mm Hg 6 months after RDN (systolic: 151 ± 6 mm Hg vs. 138 ± 21 mm Hg, p < 0.001; diastolic: 83 ± 11 mm Hg vs. 75 ± 11 mm Hg, p < 0.001). In patients (n = 36) who underwent ABPM 6 months after treatment, there was a reduction in average 24-h ABPM by 14/7 mm Hg (systolic: 150 ± 16 mm Hg vs. 136 ± 16 mm Hg, p < 0.001; diastolic: 83 ± 10 mm Hg vs. 76 ± 10 mm Hg, p < 0.001). In 51% of patients, office BP was controlled below 140/90 mm Hg after RDN. In addition, heart rate decreased from 67 ± 11 to 63 ± 10 beats/min (p = 0.006). Our data indicate that RDN may reduce office and 24-h ambulatory BP substantially in patients with moderate treatment-resistant hypertension. (Renal Denervation in Treatment Resistant Hypertension; NCT01687725).

Ott C ，Mahfoud F ，Schmid A ，Ditting T ，Sobotka PA ，Veelken R ，Spies A ，Ukena C ，Laufs U ，Uder M ，Böhm M ，Schmieder RE ... -  《-》

Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics in patients with resistant hypertension.

This study investigated the effect of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RD) on central hemodynamics in patients with resistant hypertension. High central blood pressure (BP) increases cardiovascular events and mortality independently of peripheral BP. The effect of RD on central BP is unclear. A total of 110 patients underwent bilateral RD. Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were used to derive central aortic pressure and hemodynamic indices at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after ablation. Ten patients with resistant hypertension not undergoing RD served as controls. RD significantly reduced mean central aortic BP from 167/92 mm Hg to 149/88 mm Hg, 147/85 mm Hg, and 141/85 mm Hg at 1, 3, and 6 months (p < 0.001), respectively. Aortic pulse pressure decreased from 76.2 ± 23.3 mm Hg to 61.5 ± 17.5 mm Hg, 62.7 ± 18.1 mm Hg, and 54.5 ± 15.7 mm Hg 1, 3, and 6 months after RD (p < 0.001), respectively. Six months after RD aortic augmentation and augmentation index were significantly reduced by -11 mm Hg (p < 0.001) and -5.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. Carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity showed a significant reduction from 11.6 ± 3.2 m/s to 9.6 ± 3.1 m/s at 6 months (p < 0.001). Consistently, ejection duration and aortic systolic pressure load were significantly diminished, indicating improvement of cardiac work load by RD. No significant changes were obtained in control patients. Besides the known effect of RD on brachial blood pressure, the study showed for the first time that this novel approach significantly improves arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics, which might have important prognostic implications in patients with resistant hypertension at high cardiovascular risk.

Brandt MC ，Reda S ，Mahfoud F ，Lenski M ，Böhm M ，Hoppe UC ... -  《-》