Medium-term outcome after lung transplantation is comparable between brain-dead and cardiac-dead donors.

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) to overcome the donor organ shortage is now moving into the clinical setting, but the medium-term outcome after DCD lung transplantation (LTx) remains largely unknown. In this retrospective study, DCD LTx recipients (n = 21) were compared with a cohort of donation-after-brain-death (DBD) LTx recipients (n = 154) transplanted between February 2007 and July 2010. Immediate (post)operative outcome was evaluated by assessing need for peri-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), time to extubation, hospital discharge and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within the first 48 hours. Survival, incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), acute rejection (AR) and inflammatory markers in blood and in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were assessed and compared over a median follow-up of 327 days for DCD and 531 days for DBD, showing no statistically significant difference (NS). There were no differences between groups with regard to patient characteristics except for a higher number of patients transplanted for obliterative bronchiolitis in the DCD group (4 of 21 vs 7 of 154; p < 0.05). In the DCD group, 2 of 21 patients died, vs 23 of 154 patients in the DBD group (NS). Actuarial survival rates at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years are 95%, 95% and 71% for the DCD group and 96%, 91% and 75% for the DBD group (NS). Three patients (14%) in the DCD group developed BOS vs 15 patients (10%) in the DBD group (NS). Survival and freedom from BOS were not different between the groups. AR, inflammatory markers and immediate (post)operative outcome also did not differ. In our experience, both early- and medium-term outcome in DCD lung recipients is comparable to that of DBD lung recipients. Use of lungs recovered from controlled donors after cardiac death is a safe option for expansion of the donor pool.

De Vleeschauwer SI ，Wauters S ，Dupont LJ ，Verleden SE ，Willems-Widyastuti A ，Vanaudenaerde BM ，Verleden GM ，Van Raemdonck DE ... -  《-》

Lung transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors: long-term follow-up in a single center.

We sought to examine long-term outcomes at the University of Wisconsin for all lung transplant recipients who received lungs from donation after cardiac death donors since the initiation of this program in 1993. Eighteen (4.2%) of the 424 lung transplantations performed in 406 patients between January 1993 and April 2009 used lungs from donation after cardiac death donors. Outcomes for this recipient cohort were compared with those for recipients who received organs from brain-dead donors. Warm ischemic time (from withdrawal of support to reperfusion of organs) was 30 +/- 17 minutes (11-93 minutes). The patient survival rates in the donation after cardiac death group (DCD group) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 88.1% +/- 7.9%, 81.9% +/- 9.5%, and 81.9% +/- 9.5%, respectively. These survival rates were not different from those of the brain-dead donor group (BDD group, P = .66). The incidence of primary graft dysfunction in the DCD group was similar to that of the BDD group (P = .59). However, the incidence of airway complications was somewhat higher in the DCD group. Freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome at 1, 3, and 5 years in the DCD group was 80.4% +/- 10.2%, 80.4% +/- 10.2%, and 72.3% +/- 11.9%, respectively, and did not differ from the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in the BDD group (P = .59). Our data show that the long-term patient and graft survival rates after donation after cardiac death lung transplantation were equivalent to those after brain-dead donor lung transplantation. Our findings suggest that the use of donation after cardiac death donors can safely and substantially expand the donor pool for lung transplantation.

De Oliveira NC ，Osaki S ，Maloney JD ，Meyer KC ，Kohmoto T ，D'Alessandro AM ，Love RB ... -  《-》

Single-lung transplantation: does side matter?

Single-lung transplantation (SLTx) is a valid treatment option for patients with non-suppurative end-stage pulmonary disease. This strategy helps to overcome current organ shortage. Side is usually chosen based on pre-transplant quantitative perfusion scan, unless specific recipient considerations or contralateral lung offer dictates opposite side. It remains largely unknown whether outcome differs between left (L) versus right (R) SLTx. Between July 1991 and July 2009, 142 first SLTx (M/F=87/55; age=59 (29-69) years) were performed from 142 deceased donors (M/F=81/61; age=40 (14-66) years) with a median follow-up of 32 (0-202) months. Indications for SLTx were emphysema (55.6%), pulmonary fibrosis (36.6%), primary pulmonary hypertension (0.7%), and others (7.0%). Recipients of L-SLTx (n=72) and R-SLTx (n=70) were compared for donor and recipient characteristics and for early and late outcome. Donors of L-SLTx were younger (37 (14-65) vs 43 (16-66) years; p=0.033). R-SLTx recipients had more often emphysema (67.1% vs 44.4%; p=0.046) and replacement of native lung with ≥ 50% perfusion (47.1% vs 23.6%; p=0.003). The need for bypass, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and 30-day mortality did not differ between groups. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 78.4%, 60.5%, and 49.4%, respectively, with a median survival of 60 months, with no significant differences between sides. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV₁) improved (p<0.01) in both groups to comparable values up to 36 months. Complications overall (44.4% vs 50.0%) or in allograft (25.0% vs 24.3.0%) as well as time to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) (35 months) and 5-year freedom from BOS (68.9% vs 75.0%) were comparable after L-SLTx versus R-SLTx, respectively. There were no differences in all causes of death (p=0.766). On multivariate analysis, BOS was a strong negative predictor for survival (hazard ratio (HR) 6.78; p<0.001), whereas side and mismatch for perfusion were not. The preferred side for SLTx differed between fibrotic versus emphysema recipients. Transplant side does not influence recipient survival, freedom from BOS, complications, or pulmonary function after SLTx. Besides surgical considerations in the recipient, offer of a donor lung opposite to the preferred side should not be a reason to postpone the transplantation until a better-matched donor is found.

Tsagkaropoulos S ，Belmans A ，Verleden GM ，Coosemans W ，Decaluwe H ，De Leyn P ，Nafteux P ，Van Raemdonck D ... -  《-》

Influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on outcomes after kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death.

Nagaraja P ，Roberts GW ，Stephens M ，Horvath S ，Fialova J ，Chavez R ，Asderakis A ，Kaposztas Z ... -  《-》

Initial experience with lung donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada.

Cypel M ，Sato M ，Yildirim E ，Karolak W ，Chen F ，Yeung J ，Boasquevisque C ，Leist V ，Singer LG ，Yasufuku K ，Deperrot M ，Waddell TK ，Keshavjee S ，Pierre A ... -  《-》