Pre-emptive contact precautions for intubated patients reduced healthcare-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection in an intensive care unit.

Healthcare-associated infection by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is still a great concern in an intensive care unit (ICU). Our surveillance data in the ICU revealed that intubated patients were at eight times higher risk of acquiring MRSA than non-intubated patients, so we hypothesised that pre-emptive contact precautions for all intubated patients would prevent healthcare-associated infection by MRSA in the ICU. Patients staying in our ICU for >2 days were included in this study. The study period was divided into two periods. During 2004 (1st period), contact precautions were performed only for patients with MRSA. During 2005-2007 (2nd period), contact precautions were applied to all intubated patients regardless of MRSA infection status. Patients were defined as MRSA-positive on admission when MRSA was detected by surveillance or clinical culture on enrolment. Other MRSA-positive results were defined as healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) transmission. HA-MRSA infection was diagnosed according to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Manual. The 1st period comprised 415 patients, and the 2nd period comprised 1280 patients. In intubated patients, HA-MRSA infection rate decreased significantly in the 2nd period (1st period 12.2%, 2nd period 5.6%; P=0.015). HA-MRSA infection of all patients decreased from 3.6 to 2.3 incidents per 1000 patient-days (P<0.05), despite a significant increase in the rate of patients MRSA positive on admission in the 2nd period (1st period 2.9%; 2nd period 6.1%). Pre-emptive contact precautions for intubated patients would be helpful in reducing HA-MRSA infection in ICU.

Matsushima A ，Tasaki O ，Tomono K ，Ogura H ，Kuwagata Y ，Sugimoto H ，Hamasaki T ... -  《-》

Impact of pre-emptive contact precautions for outborn neonates on the incidence of healthcare-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in a Japanese neonatal intensive care unit.

The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a high-risk setting for transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Very few studies have investigated the impact of pre-emptive contact precautions applied to outborn neonates transferred to an NICU on the incidence of healthcare-associated (HA)-MRSA transmission. To assess the efficacy of pre-emptive contact precautions for outborn neonates implemented in an NICU. A before-and-after intervention study was conducted in the NICU of Kobe University Hospital. Pre-emptive contact precautions for outborn neonates were introduced in September 2008. The period before the introduction of pre-emptive contact precautions (January 2007-August 2008) was compared with the period after the introduction of pre-emptive contact precautions (September 2008-December 2010). Data for all admitted neonates, neonates who stayed in the NICU for more than three days, length of NICU stay, incidence of MRSA-positive outborn neonates on admission, hand hygiene compliance and incidence of HA-MRSA transmission were compared between the two periods. There were no significant differences in the percentage of outborn patients admitted to the NICU, percentage of patients who stayed in the NICU for more than three days, length of NICU stay, and incidence of MRSA-positive outborn patients at NICU admission between the groups enrolled before and after the introduction of pre-emptive contact precautions. However, hand hygiene compliance increased, and the incidence of HA-MRSA transmission reduced significantly from 3.5/1000 to 1.3/1000 patient-days after the introduction of pre-emptive contact precautions (P < 0.0001). Pre-emptive contact precautions for outborn neonates were effective in reducing the incidence of HA-MRSA transmission in a Japanese NICU.

Morioka I ，Yahata M ，Shibata A ，Miwa A ，Yokota T ，Jikimoto T ，Nakamura M ，Lee JJ ，Yoshida H ，Yamada H ，Arakawa S ，Iijima K ... -  《-》

Assessment of risk factors related to healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection at patient admission to an intensive care unit in Japan.

Yamakawa K ，Tasaki O ，Fukuyama M ，Kitayama J ，Matsuda H ，Nakamori Y ，Fujimi S ，Ogura H ，Kuwagata Y ，Hamasaki T ，Shimazu T ... -  《BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES》

Impact of active surveillance on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and hospital resource utilisation.

The utility of active surveillance cultures (ASCs) for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been a controversial aspect of infection prevention. This prospective cohort study analyses the effect of ASCs for MRSA on hospital-acquired infections in a tertiary care hospital (hospital 1) and a community-based hospital (hospital 2). Both hospitals have high MRSA prevalence and are part of a large healthcare system in southeastern Michigan. Hospital-acquired infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the rest of the hospital were compared before and after the implementation of ASCs in the ICUs. Patients in hospital 1 with evidence of MRSA colonisation from ASCs were placed in contact isolation during their stay in the ICU; patients from hospital 2 remained in contact isolation throughout their hospital stay. Prevalence of MRSA colonisation on admission to the ICU was 23% and 13% in hospitals 1 and 2, respectively. Average incidence of new colonisation during the study period was 1.85 per 1000 patient-days and 3.47 per 1000 patient-days in hospitals 1 and 2, respectively. A decrease in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) occurred in both hospitals, whereas decrease in hospital-wide nosocomial MRSA infection was demonstrated only in hospital 2. We conclude that, in addition to standard infection prevention initiatives, ASC with contact precautions can be effective in reducing the incidence of VAP and nosocomial MRSA infection in healthcare communities with endemic MRSA.

Martinez-Capolino C ，Reyes K ，Johnson L ，Sullivan J ，Samuel L ，Digiovine B ，Eichenhorn M ，Horst HM ，Varelas P ，Mickey MA ，Washburn R ，Zervos M ... -  《-》

Active surveillance testing and decontamination strategies in intensive care units to reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Active surveillance testing (AST) and decontamination strategies (DS) using a topical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cleansing agent was introduced in July 2007 in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) and a surgical ICU (SICU) of a tertiary care hospital to reduce the incidence of MRSA infection. Data on ICU admissions between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2008, was analyzed. All subjects, excluding known MRSA status, had an ICU length of stay (LOS) of more than 24 hours and nasal swabs performed on ICU admission, every 7 days during the ICU stay, and on discharge. MICU and SICU specimens were sent for culture and in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction, respectively. MRSA-colonized (MRSAc) patients were subjected to contact isolation precautions and DS for 5 days or until ICU discharge. Data recorded included demographics, LOS, and antibiotic use. Results were analyzed using SPSS. Control charts were used to determine special cause variation. Of 653 eligible patients admitted to the ICU, 85 (13%) were determined to be MRSAc on ICU admission. A further 15% (52 of 351) were determined to be MRSAc during the ICU stay or at discharge. Thus, AST detected MRSA in at least 137 of the 653 patients (21.0%). In contrast, clinical cultures for MRSA were positive in only 12 patients (1.8%). Compared with noncolonized patients, MRSAc patients at any screening point had a longer pre-ICU LOS (P =.001), received more antibiotics (P = .004), and had a longer ICU LOS (P = .003). Compared with the preintervention period of July 2006 to June 2007, there was no significant reduction in mean MRSA infection incidence rate in both ICUs (3.8 to 3.0 per 1000 patient-days [P = .057] in the SICU and 1.4 to 1.7 per 1000 patient-days in the MICU) following intervention. In ICUs, AST detected 11 times more MRSA than clinical cultures. The lack of reduction in MRSA infection rates in the ICUs does not negate the roles of AST and DS, but does argue for better study design and outcome measures like MRSA transmission incidence, which perhaps would have demonstrated a true benefit of AST and DS.

Kurup A ，Chlebicka N ，Tan KY ，Chen EX ，Oon L ，Ling TA ，Ling ML ，Hong JL ... -  《-》