5-Year follow-up of coronary revascularization in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from ARTS (arterial revascularization therapy study)-II and ARTS-I trials.
摘要:
We compared the 5-year outcomes of diabetic patients with multivessel disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), bare-metal stents (BMS), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) enrolled in the ARTS (Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study) I and II studies. Diabetes is an established risk factor for major adverse cardiac events after revascularization. Recent trials suggest that revascularization with drug-eluting stents has equivalent safety to CABG up to 2 years. The ARTS I and II studies included 367 diabetic patients (SES: 159, CABG: 96, and BMS: 112) compared with respect to 5-year clinical outcomes. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was significantly higher in patients treated with BMS (BMS 53.6% vs. CABG 23.4% vs. SES 40.5%; log-rank, p < 0.01 for SES vs. BMS and SES vs. CABG). There was no significant difference in mortality among all 3 groups. There was, however, a statistically significant difference in the myocardial infarction rate between BMS and CABG arms (BMS 11.0%, CABG 5.2%, SES 4.8%, p = 0.04 for SES vs. BMS and p = 0.76 for SES vs. CABG). The rate of repeat revascularization was significantly lower in patients treated with CABG compared with SES (SES 33.2% vs. CABG 10.7%, p < 0.001). Revascularization rate of patients treated with SES at 5 years approached that of patients treated with BMS although remained significantly lower. This "catch-up" phenomenon was not apparent in the nondiabetic population. At 5-year follow-up, CABG has comparable safety and superior efficacy compared with BMS and SES in the treatment of diabetic patients with multivessel disease.
收起
展开
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.004
被引量:
年份:
2011


通过 文献互助 平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
求助方法1:
知识发现用户
每天可免费求助50篇
求助方法1:
关注微信公众号
每天可免费求助2篇
求助方法2:
完成求助需要支付5财富值
您目前有 1000 财富值
相似文献(207)
参考文献(0)
引证文献(23)
来源期刊
影响因子:暂无数据
JCR分区: 暂无
中科院分区:暂无