Analysis of aortic wall stress and rupture risk in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm with a gender perspective.

The most commonly used predictor of rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is the diameter; however, this does not estimate the true risk for each patient. Why women with AAAs have an increased growth rate, weaker aortic wall, and increased risk for rupture is yet unclear. It is likely that geometrical and biomechanical properties contribute to found gender differences. Several studies have shown that peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture risk (PWRR), predicted by a finite element (FE) analysis of AAAs derived from computed tomography (CT), is a better predictor of rupture than maximum diameter. The purpose of this study was to investigate if women with AAAs have an increased PWS and PWRR using an FE model compared to men. Fifteen men and 15 women (AAAs 4-6 cm) were included. AAA geometry was derived from CT scans, and PWS and PWRR were estimated using the FE method. Comparisons were made by t test and Mann-Whitney test. Mean age (women 73 years old vs men 71 years old) and mean AAA diameter was similar (49.7 mm vs 50.1 mm) for women and men. PWS did not differ for women 184 and men 198 kPa. PWRR was 0.54 (0.28-0.85) for women and 0.43 (0.24-0.66) for men, P = .06. This is the first analysis of stress and strength of the aneurysm wall with a gender perspective. The reported higher rupture risk for women has previously not been tested with geometrical and biomechanical properties. PWS did not differ, but the PWRR was slightly higher in women. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance, probably due to the small sample size. In summary, the results in the present study suggest that differences in biomechanical properties could be a contributing explanation for the higher rupture risk reported for female patients with AAAs.

Larsson E ，Labruto F ，Gasser TC ，Swedenborg J ，Hultgren R ... -  《-》

Prediction of Rupture Sites in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms After Finite Element Analysis.

To associate regions of highest local rupture risk from finite element analysis (FEA) to subsequent rupture sites in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). This retrospective multicenter study analyzed computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from 13 asymptomatic AAA patients (mean age 76 years; 8 men) experiencing rupture at a later point in time between 2005 and 2011. All patients had CTA scans before and during the rupture event. FEA was performed to calculate peak wall stress (PWS), peak wall rupture risk (PWRR), rupture risk equivalent diameters (RRED), and the intraluminal thrombus volume (ILTV). PWS and PWRR locations in the prerupture state were compared with subsequent CTA rupture findings. Visible contrast extravasation was considered a definite (n=5) rupture sign, while a periaortic hematoma was an indefinite (n=8) sign. A statistical comparison was performed between the 13-patient asymptomatic AAA group before and during rupture and a 23-patient diameter-matched asymptomatic AAA control group that underwent elective surgery. The asymptomatic AAAs before rupture showed significantly higher PWRR and RRED values compared to the matched asymptomatic AAA control group (median values 0.74 vs 0.52 and 77 vs 59 mm, respectively; p<0.0001 for both). No statistical differences could be found for PWS and ILTV. Ruptured AAAs showed the highest maximum diameters, PWRR, and RRED values. In 7 of the ruptured AAAs (2 definite and 5 indefinite rupture signs), CTA rupture sites correlated with prerupture PWRR locations. The location of the PWRR in unruptured AAAs predicted future rupture sites in several cases. Asymptomatic AAA patients with high PWRR and RRED values have an increased rupture risk.

Erhart P ，Roy J ，de Vries JP ，Liljeqvist ML ，Grond-Ginsbach C ，Hyhlik-Dürr A ，Böckler D ... -  《-》

Reproducibility of deriving parameters of AAA rupture risk from patient-specific 3D finite element models.

Hyhlik-Dürr A ，Krieger T ，Geisbüsch P ，Kotelis D ，Able T ，Böckler D ... -  《-》

Aortic outflow occlusion predicts rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Current threshold recommendations for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are based solely on maximal AAA diameter. Peak wall stress (PWS) has been demonstrated to be a better predictor than AAA diameter of AAA rupture risk. However, PWS calculations are time-intensive, not widely available, and therefore not yet clinically practical. In addition, PWS analysis does not account for variations in wall strength between patients. We therefore sought to identify surrogate clinical markers of increased PWS and decreased aortic wall strength to better predict AAA rupture risk. Patients treated at our institution from 2001 to 2014 for ruptured AAA (rAAA) were retrospectively identified and grouped into patients with small rAAA (maximum diameter <6 cm) or large rAAA (>6 cm). Patients with large (>6 cm) non-rAAA were also identified sequentially from 2009 for comparison. Demographics, vascular risk factors, maximal aortic diameter, and aortic outflow occlusion (AOO) were recorded. AOO was defined as complete occlusion of the common, internal, or external iliac artery. Computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis simulations were performed to calculate wall stress distributions and to extract PWS. We identified 61 patients with rAAA, of which 15 ruptured with AAA diameter <60 mm (small rAAA group). Patients with small rAAAs were more likely to have peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) than were patients in the large non-rAAA group. Patients with small rAAAs were also more likely to have AOO compared with non-rAAAs >60 mm (27% vs 8%; P = .047). Among all patients with rAAAs, those with AOO ruptured at smaller mean AAA diameters than in patients without AOO (62.1 ± 11.8 mm vs 72.5 ± 16.4 mm; P = .024). PWS calculations of a representative small rAAA and a large non-rAAA showed a substantial increase in PWS with AOO. We demonstrate that AOO, PAD, and COPD in AAA are associated with rAAAs at smaller diameters. AOO appears to increase PWS, whereas COPD and PAD may be surrogate markers of decreased aortic wall strength. We therefore recommend consideration of early, elective AAA repair in patients with AOO, PAD, or COPD to minimize risk of early rupture.

Crawford JD ，Chivukula VK ，Haller S ，Vatankhah N ，Bohannan CJ ，Moneta GL ，Rugonyi S ，Azarbal AF ... -  《-》

Gender, smoking, body size, and aneurysm geometry influence the biomechanical rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms as estimated by finite element analysis.

Finite element analysis (FEA) has been suggested to be superior to maximal diameter measurements in predicting rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Our objective was to investigate to what extent previously described rupture risk factors were associated with FEA-estimated rupture risk. One hundred forty-six patients with an asymptomatic AAA of a 40- to 60-mm diameter were retrospectively identified and consecutively included. The patients' computed tomography angiograms were analyzed by FEA without (neutral) and with (specific) input of patient-specific mean arterial pressure (MAP), gender, family history, and age. The maximal wall stress/wall strength ratio was described as a rupture risk equivalent diameter (RRED), which translated this ratio into an average aneurysm diameter of corresponding rupture risk. In multivariate linear regression, RREDneutral increased with female gender (3.7 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-7.3) and correlated with patient height (0.27 mm/cm; 95% CI, 0.11-0.43) and body surface area (BSA, 16 mm/m2; 95% CI, 8.3-24) and inversely with body mass index (BMI, -0.40 mm/kg m-2; 95% CI, -0.75 to -0.054) in a wall stress-dependent manner. Wall stress-adjusted RREDneutral was raised if the patient was currently smoking (1.1 mm; 95% CI, 0.21-1.9). Age, MAP, family history, and patient weight were unrelated to RREDneutral. In specific FEA, RREDspecific increased with female gender, MAP, family history positive for AAA, height, and BSA, whereas it was inversely related to BMI. All results were independent of aneurysm diameter. Peak wall stress and RRED correlated with aneurysm diameter and lumen volume. Female gender, current smoking, increased patient height and BSA, and low BMI were found to increase the mechanical rupture risk of AAAs. Previously described rupture risk factors may in part be explained by patient characteristic-dependent variations in aneurysm biomechanics.

Lindquist Liljeqvist M ，Hultgren R ，Siika A ，Gasser TC ，Roy J ... -  《-》