A comparison of two cognitive test paradigms in a penetrating brain injury model.
摘要：
A rat model of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI) was recently established to study military-relevant severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this study was to conduct a side-by-side evaluation of two well-established cognitive testing paradigms: the novel object recognition (NOR) task and the Morris water maze (MWM) task. Accordingly, male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to PBBI and their cognitive abilities were assessed at 7 and 21 days post-PBBI. Although PBBI animals had more difficulty completing both tasks compared to sham animals, their performance on the NOR task was confounded by a high degree of within-group variability that was likely due to attention deficits produced by the injury. In contrast, PBBI produced consistent, significant spatial learning deficits in the MWM task. Overall, these results suggest that the MWM task provides a more appropriate cognitive test for the PBBI model that would be useful for testing promising neuroprotective therapeutics.
收起
展开
DOI：
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.012
被引量：
年份：
1970
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
通过 文献互助 平台发起求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
求助方法1：
知识发现用户
每天可免费求助50篇
求助方法1：
关注微信公众号
每天可免费求助2篇
求助方法2：
完成求助需要支付5财富值
您目前有 1000 财富值
相似文献(113)
参考文献(0)
引证文献(10)
来源期刊
影响因子：暂无数据
JCR分区： 暂无
中科院分区：暂无
