Determining DVH parameters for combined external beam and brachytherapy treatment: 3D biological dose adding for patients with cervical cancer.

To compare two methods of DVH parameter determination for combined external beam and brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer. Clinical treatment plans from five patients were used in this study. We simulated two applications given with PDR (32 x 60 cGy per application, given hourly) or HDR (4 x 7 Gy in two applications; each application of two fractions of 7 Gy, given within 17 h) standard and optimised treatment plans, all combined with IMRT (25 x 1.8 Gy). Additionally, we simulated an external beam (EBRT) boost to pathological lymph nodes or the parametrium (7 x 2 Gy). We determined D90 of the high-risk CTV (HR-CTV) and D(2 cc) of bladder and rectum in EQD2 in two ways. (1) 'Parameter adding': assuming a uniform contribution of the EBRT dose distribution and adding the values of DVH parameters for the two brachytherapy insertions, and (2) 'distributions adding': summing 3D biological dose distributions of IMRT and brachytherapy plans and subsequently determining the values of the DVH parameters. We took alpha/beta=10 Gy for HR-CTV, alpha/beta=3 Gy otherwise and half-time of repair 1.5 h. Without EBRT boost, 'parameter adding' yielded a good approximation. With an EBRT boost to lymph nodes, the total D90 HR-CTV was underestimated by 2.6 (SD 1.3)% for PDR and 2.8 (SD 1.4)% for HDR. This was even worse with a parametrium boost: 9.1 (SD 6.2)% for PDR and 9.9 (SD 6.2)% for HDR. Without an EBRT boost 'parameter adding', as proposed by the GEC-ESTRO, yielded accurate results for the values for DVH parameters. If an EBRT boost is given 'distributions adding' should be considered.

Van de Kamer JB ，De Leeuw AA ，Moerland MA ，Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM ... -  《-》

The effect of alternative biological modelling parameters (α/β and half time of repair T ½ ) on reported EQD2 values in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer.

To evaluate the effect of different α/β and half-time of repair T(½) on the assessment of clinical treatment plans for patients with cervical cancer. We used EBRT and BT treatment plans of five patients, planned with MRI guided BT. We computed 3D EQD2 dose distributions of combined EBRT and BT treatments and calculated D90 of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and D(2cc) for bladder and rectum, and the ratio D(2cc)(bladder)/D90(HR-CTV). BT was modelled as PDR (two applications of 32×60cGy) and HDR (two applications of 2×7Gy). We assumed a low, standard and high value for the biological parameters: HR-CTV α/β=5/10/15Gy and T(½)=0.5/1.5/2.5h; OAR α/β=2/3/4Gy; T(½)=0.5/1.5/4.5h. The chosen variation in modelling parameters had a much larger effect on PDR treatments than on HDR treatments, especially for OAR, thus creating larger uncertainties. The relative mean range of the ratio D(2cc)(bladder)/D90(HR-CTV) is 72% for PDR and 25% for HDR. Out of the 125 modelled combinations 48 PDR plans and 23 HDR plans comply with clinical objectives. For HDR brachytherapy, only α/β has a significant impact on reported EQD2 values, whereas for PDR both α/β and T(½) are important. Generally, the ratio D(2cc)(bladder)/D90(HR-CTV) is more favourable for PDR, even considering the larger uncertainties in EQD2.

De Leeuw AA ，Van de Kamer JB ，Moerland MA ，Philippens ME ，Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM ... -  《-》

A dose-volume analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-aided high-dose-rate image-based interstitial brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer.

To investigate the feasibility of our novel image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for uterine cervical cancer, we evaluated the dose-volume histogram (DVH) according to the recommendations of the Gynecological GEC-ESTRO Working Group for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). Between June 2005 and June 2007, 18 previously untreated cervical cancer patients were enrolled. We implanted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-available plastic applicators by our unique ambulatory technique. Total treatment doses were 30-36 Gy (6 Gy per fraction) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Treatment plans were created based on planning computed tomography with MRI as a reference. DVHs of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV), intermediate-risk CTV (IR CTV), and the bladder and rectum were calculated. Dose values were biologically normalized to equivalent doses in 2-Gy fractions (EQD(2)). The median D90 (HR CTV) and D90 (IR CTV) per fraction were 6.8 Gy (range, 5.5-7.5) and 5.4 Gy (range, 4.2-6.3), respectively. The median V100 (HR CTV) and V100 (IR CTV) were 98.4% (range, 83-100) and 81.8% (range, 64-93.8), respectively. When the dose of EBRT was added, the median D90 and D100 of HR CTV were 80.6 Gy (range, 65.5-96.6) and 62.4 Gy (range, 49-83.2). The D(2cc) of the bladder was 62 Gy (range, 51.4-89) and of the rectum was 65.9 Gy (range, 48.9-76). Although the targets were advanced and difficult to treat effectively by ICBT, MRI-aided image-based ISBT showed favorable results for CTV and organs at risk compared with previously reported image-based ICBT results.

Yoshida K ，Yamazaki H ，Takenaka T ，Kotsuma T ，Yoshida M ，Furuya S ，Tanaka E ，Uegaki T ，Kuriyama K ，Matsumoto H ，Yamada S ，Ban C ... -  《-》

Image and laparoscopic guided interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced primary or recurrent gynaecological cancer using the adaptive GEC ESTRO target concept.

To retrospectively assess treatment outcome of image and laparoscopic guided interstitial pulsed dose rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) for locally advanced gynaecological cancer using the adaptive GEC ESTRO target concept. Between June 2005 and December 2010, 28 consecutive patients were treated for locally advanced primary vaginal (nine), recurrent endometrial (12) or recurrent cervical cancer (seven) with combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and interstitial PDR-BT. Treatment was initiated with whole pelvic EBRT to a median dose of 45 Gy followed by PDR-BT using the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT). All implants were virtually preplanned using MRI of the pelvis with a dummy MUPIT in situ. The GEC ESTRO high risk clinical target volume (HR CTV), intermediate risk clinical target volume (IR CTV) and the organs at risk (OAR) were contoured and a preplan for implantation was generated (BrachyVision, Varian). The subsequent implantation was performed under laparoscopic visualisation. Final contouring and treatment planning were done using a post-implant CT. Planning aim of PDR-BT was to deliver 30 Gy in 50 hourly pulses to HR CTV. Manual dose optimisation was performed with the aim of reaching a D90>80 Gy in the HR CTV calculated as the total biologically equivalent to 2 Gy fractions of EBRT and BT (EQD2). Dose to the OAR were evaluated using dose volume constraints for D(2cc) of 90 Gy for bladder and 70 Gy for rectum and sigmoid. For HR CTV the median volume was 26 cm(3) (7-91 cm(3)). Coverage of the HR CTV was 97% (90-100%) and D90 was 82 Gy (77-88 Gy). The D(2cc) for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 65 Gy (47-81 Gy), 61 Gy (50-77 Gy), and 52 Gy (44-68 Gy), respectively. Median follow up was 18 months (6-61 months). The actuarial 2 years local control rate was 92% (SE 5), while disease-free survival and overall survival were 59% (SE 11) and 74%, respectively (SE 10). No complications to the laparoscopic guided implantation were encountered. Late grade 2 (CTC v 3.0) complications were recorded in nine (32%) patients. One patient had a grade 3 vaginal complication. No grade 4-5 complications have been recorded so far. Image and laparoscopic guided interstitial PDR-BT using the GEC ESTRO target concept is applicable for locally advanced primary vaginal or recurrent endometrial and cervical cancer resulting in an excellent local control rate and limited morbidity.

Fokdal L ，Tanderup K ，Nielsen SK ，Christensen HK ，Røhl L ，Pedersen EM ，Schønemann NK ，Lindegaard JC ... -  《-》

A dose planning study on applicator guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Assenholt MS ，Petersen JB ，Nielsen SK ，Lindegaard JC ，Tanderup K ... -  《-》