Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
Is there an association between patients' reproductive history and the mean euploidy rates per biopsied blastocysts (m-ER) or the live birth rates (LBRs) per first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfers?
Patients' reproductive history (as annotated during counselling) showed no association with the m-ER, but a lower LBR was reported after euploid blastocyst transfer in women with a history of repeated implantation failure (RIF).
Several studies have investigated the association between the m-ER and (i) patients' basal characteristics, (ii) ovarian stimulation strategy and dosage, (iii) culture media and conditions, and (iv) embryo morphology and day of full blastocyst development. Conversely, the expected m-ER due to women's reproductive history (previous live births (LBs), miscarriages, failed IVF cycles and transfers, and lack of euploid blastocysts among prior cohorts of biopsied embryos) still needs investigations. Yet, this information is critical to counsel new patients about a first cycle with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), but even more so after former adverse outcomes to prevent treatment drop-out.
This observational study included all patients undergoing a comprehensive chromosome testing (CCT)-based PGT-A cycle with at least one biopsied blastocyst in the period April 2013-December 2019 at a private IVF clinic (n = 2676 patients undergoing 2676 treatments and producing and 8151 blastocysts). m-ER were investigated according to women's reproductive history of LBs: no/≥1, miscarriages: no/1/>1; failed IVF cycles: no/1/2/>2, and implantation failures after previous transfers: no/1/2/>2. Among the 2676 patients included in this study, 440 (16%) had already undergone PGT-A before the study period; the data from these patients were further clustered according to the presence or absence of euploid embryo(s) in their previous cohort of biopsied blastocysts. The clinical outcomes per first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfers (n =1580) were investigated according to the number of patients' previous miscarriages and implantation failures.
The procedures involved in this study included ICSI, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy without hatching in Day 3, CCT-based PGT-A without reporting segmental and/or putative mitotic (or mosaic) aneuploidies and single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests, as well as linear regressions and generalised linear models among ranges of maternal age at oocyte retrieval were performed to identify significant differences for continuous variables. Fisher's exact tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses were instead used for categorical variables.
Maternal age at oocyte retrieval was the only variable significantly associated with the m-ER. We defined five clusters (<35 years: 66 ± 31%; 35-37 years: 58 ± 33%; 38-40 years: 43 ± 35%; 40-42 years: 28 ± 34%; and >42 years: 17 ± 31%) and all analyses were conducted among them. The m-ER did not show any association with the number of previous LBs, miscarriages, failed IVF cycles or implantation failures. Among patients who had already undergone PGT-A before the study period, the m-ER did not associate with the absence (or presence) of euploid blastocysts in their former cohort of biopsied embryos. Regarding clinical outcomes of the first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer, the implantation rate was 51%, the miscarriage rate was 14% and the LBR was 44%. This LBR was independent of the number of previous miscarriages, but showed a decreasing trend depending on the number of previous implantation failures, reaching statistical significance when comparing patients with >2 failures and patients with no prior failure (36% versus 47%, P < 0.01; multivariate-OR adjusted for embryo quality and day of full blastocyst development: 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, P < 0.01). No such differences were shown for previous miscarriage rates.
The sample size for treatments following a former completed PGT-A cycle should be larger in future studies. The data should be confirmed from a multicentre perspective. The analysis should be performed also in non-PGT cycles and/or including patients who did not produce blastocysts, in order to investigate a putative association between women's reproductive history with outcomes other than euploidy and LBRs.
These data are critical to counsel infertile couples before, during and after a PGT-A cycle, especially to prevent treatment discontinuation due to previous adverse reproductive events. Beyond the 'maternal age effect', the causes of idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and RIF are likely to be endometrial receptivity and selectivity issues; transferring euploid blastocysts might reduce the risk of a further miscarriage, but more information beyond euploidy are required to improve the prognosis in case of RIF.
No funding was received and there are no competing interests.
N/A.
Cimadomo D
，Capalbo A
，Dovere L
，Tacconi L
，Soscia D
，Giancani A
，Scepi E
，Maggiulli R
，Vaiarelli A
，Rienzi L
，Ubaldi FM
... -
《-》
The reproductive potential of vitrified-warmed euploid embryos declines following repeated uterine transfers.
Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) represents a vague clinical condition with an unclear diagnostic challenge that lacks solid scientific underpinning. Although euploid embryos have demonstrated consistent implantation capabilities across various age groups, a unanimous agreement regarding the advantages of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in managing RIF is absent. The ongoing discussion about whether chromosomal aneuploidy in embryos significantly contributes to recurrent implantation failure remains unsettled. Despite active discussions in recent times, a universally accepted characterization of recurrent implantation failure remains elusive. We aimed in this study to measure the reproductive performance of vitrified-warmed euploid embryos transferred to the uterus in successive cycles.
This observational cohort study included women (n = 387) with an anatomically normal uterus who underwent oocyte retrieval for PGT-A treatment with at least one biopsied blastocyst, between January 2017 and December 2021 at a university-affiliated public fertility center. The procedures involved in this study included ICSI, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive 24-chromosome analysis of preimplantation embryos using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Women, who failed a vitrified-warmed euploid embryo transfer, had successive blastocyst transfer cycles (FET) for a total of three using remaining cryopreserved euploid blastocysts from the same oocyte retrieval cycle. The primary endpoints were sustained implantation rate (SIR) and live birth rate (LBR) per vitrified-warmed single euploid embryo. The secondary endpoints were mean euploidy rate (m-ER) per cohort of biopsied blastocysts from each patient, as well as pregnancy and miscarriage rates.
The mean age of the patient population was 33.4 years (95% CI 32.8-33.9). A total of 1,641 embryos derived from the first oocyte retrieval cycle were biopsied and screened. We found no associations between the m-ER and the number of previous failed IVF cycles among different ranges of maternal age at oocyte retrieval (P = 0.45). Pairwise comparisons showed a significant decrease in the sustained implantation rate (44.7% vs. 30%; P = 0.01) and the livebirth rate per single euploid blastocyst (37.1% vs. 25%; P = 0.02) between the 1st and 3rd FET. The cumulative SIR and LBR after up to three successive single embryo transfers were 77.1% and 68.8%, respectively. We found that the live birth rate of the first vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transferred decreased significantly with the increasing number of previously failed IVF attempts by categories (45.3% vs. 35.8% vs. 27.6%; P = 0.04). A comparable decrease in sustained implantation rate was also observed but did not reach statistical significance (50% vs. 44.2 vs. 37.9%; P = NS). Using a logistic regression model, we confirmed the presence of a negative association between the number of previous IVF failed attempts and the live birth rate per embryo transfer cycle (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.62-0.94; P = 0.01).
These findings are vital for enhancing patient counseling and refining management strategies for individuals facing recurrent implantation failure. By tailoring interventions based on age and ovarian reserve, healthcare professionals can offer more personalized guidance, potentially improving the overall success rates and patient experiences in fertility treatments.
N/A.
Almohammadi A
，Choucair F
，El Taha L
，Burjaq H
，Albader M
，Cavanillas AB
，Awwad JT
... -
《Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology》
What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
What is the rate of euploidy and the reproductive potential of embryos biopsied after 6 days of development?
Embryos biopsied after 6 days of development have higher rates of aneuploidy; however, day 7 euploid embryos selected at transfer can achieve acceptable pregnancy rates and live birth (LB) outcomes.
Recent publications have shown promising treatment results after euploid day 7 embryo transfers (ETs), albeit these studies were limited by small sample sizes. Whereas the current clinical standard has been to discard embryos that do not reach expansion by day 6 of development, the lack of robust data surrounding the clinical utility of day 7 embryos warrants further evaluation.
Retrospective cohort analysis in a single, academic in vitro fertilization (IVF) center from January 2012 to March 2018. A total of 25 775 embryos underwent trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Additionally, the clinical IVF outcomes of 3824 single, euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles were evaluated.
Cohorts were segregated by day of TE biopsy following oocyte retrieval (day 5, day 6 or day 7). PGT-A was performed to identify embryonic ploidy rates. Secondly, IVF and LB outcomes after single, euploid FET were evaluated for each cohort.
A total of day 5 (n = 12 535), day 6 (n = 11 939) and day 7 (n = 1298) embryos were included in the study analysis. The rate of embryo euploidy was significantly lower in day 7 blastocysts compared to day 5 or day 6 cohorts (day 7 = 40.5%; day 5 = 54.7%; day 6 = 52.9%; (P < 0.0001)). After adjusting for age, anti-Müllerian hormone, BMI, embryo quality and number of embryos biopsied, there was a significant association between aneuploidy and embryos biopsied on day 7 when compared to day 5 biopsied embryos (OR = 1.34, CI 95% 1.09-1.45, P = 0.001) and day 6 biopsied embryos (OR = 1.26, CI95% 1.07-1.16, P < 0.001).A sub-analysis of subsequent 3824 single, euploid FET cycles (day 5: n = 2321 cycles; day 6: n = 1381 cycles; and day 7: n = 116 cycles) showed significant differences among cohorts in implantation, clinical pregnancy, LB and clinical loss rates. There was a significant decrease in the odds of implantation, clinical pregnancy and LB, but no association with clinical loss or multiple pregnancy rates in patients who utilized day 7-biopsied embryos during treatment.
The retrospective nature of the study and potential variability in the study center's laboratory protocol(s) compared to other reproductive treatment centers may limit the external validity of our findings. Additionally, patients who transferred euploid embryos, biopsied on day 7 of development due to an absence of day 5 or day 6 counterparts, may have introduced selection bias in this study.
Embryonic developmental stage, morphological grade and ploidy status are paramount factors affecting ET selection and implantation potential. This study reveals that embryos ineligible for TE biopsy on day 5 or day 6 of development may benefit from extended culture to day 7. Our study demonstrates patient benefit when extended culture to day 7 of development is routinely performed for embryos failing to meet biopsy criteria by day 5 or 6.
No funding was received for the realization of this manuscript. Dr Alan Copperman is Advisor or Board Member of Sema 4 (Stake holder in Data), Progyny and Celmatix.
This retrospective analysis was approved by an Institutional Review Board (WIRB PRO NUM: 20161791; Study Number: 1167398).
Hernandez-Nieto C
，Lee JA
，Slifkin R
，Sandler B
，Copperman AB
，Flisser E
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
