When Rensch meets Bergmann: does sexual size dimorphism change systematically with latitude?

Bergmann's and Rensch's rules describe common large-scale patterns of body size variation, but their underlying causes remain elusive. Bergmann's rule states that organisms are larger at higher latitudes (or in colder climates). Rensch's rule states that male body size varies (or evolutionarily diverges) more than female body size among species, resulting in slopes greater than one when male size is regressed on female size. We use published studies of sex-specific latitudinal body size clines in vertebrates and invertebrates to investigate patterns equivalent to Rensch's rule among populations within species and to evaluate their possible relation to Bergmann's rule. Consistent with previous studies, we found a continuum of Bergmann (larger at higher latitudes: 58 species) and converse Bergmann body size clines (larger at lower latitudes: 40 species). Ignoring latitude, male size was more variable than female size in only 55 of 98 species, suggesting that intraspecific variation in sexual size dimorphism does not generally conform to Rensch's rule. In contrast, in a significant majority of species (66 of 98) male latitudinal body size clines were steeper than those of females. This pattern is consistent with a latitudinal version of Rensch's rule, and suggests that some factor that varies systematically with latitude is responsible for producing Rensch's rule among populations within species. Identifying the underlying mechanisms will require studies quantifying latitudinal variation in sex-specific natural and sexual selection on body size.

Blanckenhorn WU ，Stillwell RC ，Young KA ，Fox CW ，Ashton KG ... -  《EVOLUTION》

Geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle.

Body size of many animals varies with latitude: body size is either larger at higher latitudes (Bergmann's rule) or smaller at higher latitudes (converse Bergmann's rule). However, the causes underlying these patterns are poorly understood. Also, studies rarely explore how sexual size dimorphism varies with latitude. Here we investigate geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of the seed-feeding beetle Stator limbatus, collected from 95 locations along a 38 degrees range in latitude. We examine 14 variables to test whether clines in environmental factors are adequate to explain geographic patterns of body size. We found that body size and sexual size dimorphism of S. limbatus varied considerably with latitude; beetles were smaller but more dimorphic at lower latitudes. Body size was not correlated with a gradient in mean temperature, contrary to the commonly accepted hypothesis that clines are produced by latitudinal gradients in temperature. Instead, we found that three factors were adequate to explain the cline in body size: clinal variation in host plant seed size, moisture (humidity), and seasonality (variance in humidity, precipitation, and temperature). We also found that the cline in sexual size dimorphism was partially explainable by a gradient in moisture, though moisture alone was not sufficient to explain the cline. Other ecological or environmental variables must necessarily contribute to differences in selection on male versus female body size. The main implications of our study are that the sexes differ in the magnitude of clinal variation in body size, creating latitudinal variation in sexual size dimorphism, and that clines in body size of seed beetles are likely influenced by variation in host seed size, water availability, and seasonality.

Stillwell RC ，Morse GE ，Fox CW 《-》

Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.

1. Allometric scaling of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) with body size is a commonplace occurrence in intraspecific or interspecific comparisons. Typically, SSD increases with body size when males, and decreases when females are the larger sex--a pattern known as Rensch's rule. Intraspecific studies of Rensch's rule in vertebrates are extremely scarce. 2. In an allometric SSD-body size relationship, the sex with the larger body size variation is the driver of size divergence whereas the other sex is following it owing to correlational selection. Hence, one can test which sex is responsible for the observed body size divergence within this framework. 3. Nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) provides an excellent model to study intraspecific variation in SSD owing to the large interpopulation variation in mean body size. Using data on body size variation in 11 nine-spined stickleback populations covering the full known size range of the species, we investigated: (i) whether variation in SSD scales allometrically with mean body size across the populations; (ii) which sex is driving the allometric relationship and (iii) whether the observed pattern is likely to have a genetic component. In addition, we analysed the size dependency of female reproductive output. 4. We found strong support for an inverse of Rensch's rule: level of female-biased SSD increased with increasing mean size while females were the more variable sex. Results from a common garden experiment supported the pattern found in the wild. Females from giant populations had 2-3 times larger reproductive output than normal-sized females. 5. The fact that females were the more variable sex indicates that the evolution of gigantism in nine-spined sticklebacks is driven by females, and the 2-3 times larger reproductive output per clutch of giant vs. normal-sized females suggests fecundity selection to have an important role in it. Our results oppose the commonly held view that males drive the evolution of SSD as a result of sexual selection favouring larger males.

Herczeg G ，Gonda A ，Merilä J 《-》

Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.

Within any given clade, male size and female size typically covary, but male size often varies more than female size. This generates a pattern of allometry for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) known as Rensch's rule. I use allometry for SSD among populations of the water strider Aquarius remigis (Hemiptera, Gerridae) to test the hypothesis that Rensch's rule evolves in response to sexual selection on male secondary sexual traits and an alternative hypothesis that it is caused by greater phenotypic plasticity of body size in males. Comparisons of three populations reared under two temperature regimes are combined with an analysis of allometry for genital and somatic components of body size among 25 field populations. Contrary to the sexual-selection hypothesis, genital length, the target of sexual selection, shows the lowest allometric slope of all the assayed traits. Instead, the results support a novel interpretation of the differential-plasticity hypothesis: that the traits most closely associated with reproductive fitness (abdomen length in females and genital length in males) are "adaptively canalized." While this hypothesis is unlikely to explain Rensch's rule among species or higher clades, it may explain widespread patterns of intraspecific variation in SSD recently documented for many insect species.

Fairbairn DJ 《-》

Latitudinal patterns in human stature and sexual stature dimorphism.

There exists substantial variation in human stature and sexual stature dimorphism that has been attributed to both genetic and environmental variables. A few studies have previously investigated possible relationships between latitude and stature, building on the idea that variation in climate can influence body size (Bergmann's rule). This change in body size can in turn have influenced sexual stature dimorphism (in accordance with Rensch's rule). The present study investigated whether latitude is associated with variation in human mean stature and sexual stature DIMORPHISM. Phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic analyses were conducted on a cross-cultural sample of 124 human populations. The results indicate that both male and female mean stature increase with increasing distance from the equator. While sexual stature dimorphism also was positively related to latitude in the non-phylogenetic test, this relationship disappeared when using a phylogenetic comparative method. Evidence was also found for curved relationships between latitude and both male and female stature, as well as stature dimorphism, all indicating a maximum at around 40 degrees from the equator. The results of the present study indicate that both male and female stature are weakly associated with latitude. It is possible that these relationships are evolved responses to variation in climate. No unequivocal conclusion could be drawn regarding a possible relationship between latitude and sexual stature dimorphism.

Gustafsson A ，Lindenfors P 《-》