Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation.

Induction therapy reduces the frequency of acute rejection and delayed graft function after transplantation. A rabbit antithymocyte polyclonal antibody or basiliximab, an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, is most commonly used for induction. In this prospective, randomized, international study, we compared short courses of antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab in patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor. Patients taking cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone were randomly assigned to receive either rabbit antithymocyte globulin (1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight daily, 141 patients) during transplantation (day 0) and on days 1 through 4 or basiliximab (20 mg, 137 patients) on days 0 and 4. The primary end point was a composite of acute rejection, delayed graft function, graft loss, and death. At 12 months, the incidence of the composite end point was similar in the two groups (P=0.34). The antithymocyte globulin group, as compared with the basiliximab group, had lower incidences of acute rejection (15.6% vs. 25.5%, P=0.02) and of acute rejection that required treatment with antibody (1.4% vs. 8.0%, P=0.005). The antithymocyte globulin group and the basiliximab group had similar incidences of graft loss (9.2% and 10.2%, respectively), delayed graft function (40.4% and 44.5%), and death (4.3% and 4.4%). Though the incidences of all adverse events, serious adverse events, and cancers were also similar between the two groups, patients receiving antithymocyte globulin had a greater incidence of infection (85.8% vs. 75.2%, P=0.03) but a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (7.8% vs. 17.5%, P=0.02). Among patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor, induction therapy consisting of a 5-day course of antithymocyte globulin, as compared with basiliximab, reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection but not the incidence of delayed graft function. Patient and graft survival were similar in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00235300 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Brennan DC ，Daller JA ，Lake KD ，Cibrik D ，Del Castillo D ，Thymoglobulin Induction Study Group ... -  《-》

Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation.

Hanaway MJ ，Woodle ES ，Mulgaonkar S ，Peddi VR ，Kaufman DB ，First MR ，Croy R ，Holman J ，INTAC Study Group ... -  《-》

Induction treatment with rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplant recipients with planned early steroid withdrawal.

Martin ST ，Roberts KL ，Malek SK ，Tullius SG ，Vadivel N ，De Serres S ，Grafals M ，Elsanjak A ，Filkins BA ，Chandraker A ，Gabardi S ... -  《-》

Efficacy and safety of thymoglobulin and basiliximab in kidney transplant patients at high risk for acute rejection and delayed graft function.

Chen G ，Gu J ，Qiu J ，Wang C ，Fei J ，Deng S ，Li J ，Huang G ，Fu Q ，Chen L ... -  《-》

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin compared with basiliximab in kidney transplantation: a single-center study.

Induction therapy is used to reduce the incidence of acute rejection and to prevent or treat delayed graft function. We compared basiliximab with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as induction therapies for kidney transplant recipients. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 514 patients who received ATG or basiliximab. The patients in the ATG group (n = 152) received ATG (1.5 mg/kg/d) for 5-7 days and those in the basiliximab group (n = 362) were given 2 doses of basiliximab (20 mg) on posttransplantation days 0 and 4. All patients received standard triple immunosuppressive therapy with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. There were statistically significant differences in the incidences of delayed graft function, 1-year acute rejection rate, death-censored graft survival, and patient survival between the 2 groups, even though the ATG group had more kidney transplants from deceased donors, higher levels of panel reactive antibodies, and more retransplantations. The incidences of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and parvovirus infection in the ATG group were higher than those in the basiliximab group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of CMV disease between the 2 groups. ATG is safe and efficacious for use in kidney transplant recipients. Our results suggest that ATG should be considered for induction therapy in high-risk patients, such as those who have a kidney allograft from a deceased donor, high levels of panel reactive antibodies, and are undergoing retransplantation.

Kim JM ，Jang HR ，Kwon CH ，Huh WS ，Kim GS ，Kim SJ ，Joh JW ，Oh HY ... -  《-》