Outcome of donors with a remnant liver volume of less than 35% after right hepatectomy.

To overcome the barrier of size match, right lobe graft has been widely used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We assessed donor outcome, with a focus on remnant liver volume (RLV) after right hepatectomy based on the experiences of 2 LDLT centers, as a means of guiding the establishment of safe RLV limits for donor right hepatectomy. Between January 2002 and December 2003, a consecutive 146 liver donors who underwent right hepatectomy with at least 12 months of follow-up were enrolled in this study. Donors were grouped into 2 groups according to RLV: group 1 (n = 74), <35% (range, 26.9-34.9) and group 2 (n = 72), > or = 35% (35.0-46.8). No donors died or suffered a life-threatening complication. Mean peak serum postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (IU/L) levels were 219.5 +/- 79.9 and 231.5 +/- 83.3 in group 1 and 210.3 +/- 81.6 and 225.8 +/- 93.0 in group 2 (P = 0.497 and 0.699), respectively. Mean peak serum total bilirubin (TB) (mg/dL) level in group 1 (3.4 +/- 1.6) was higher than in group 2 (2.8 +/- 1.4; P = 0.023). Overall 23 (15.8%) major morbidities, 10 in group 1 (13.5%) and 13 in group 2 (18.1%), occurred according to Clavien's system (P = 0.939). These included bleeding (n = 3 in group 1 and n = 6 in group 2; P = 0.282), ileus (n = 3 and 1; P = 0.324), biliary leakage (n = 4 and 4; P = 0.968), and pneumonia (n = 0 and 2; P = 0.149). Minor morbidities were also comparable in the 2 groups. In conclusion, the outcome of donors with an RLV of <35% was not different from that of donors with an RLV of > or = 35%, with the exception of transient cholestasis. Therefore, a remnant RLV of <35% does not appear to be a contraindication for right liver procurement in living donors.

Cho JY ，Suh KS ，Kwon CH ，Yi NJ ，Lee HH ，Park JW ，Lee KW ，Joh JW ，Lee SK ，Lee KU ... -  《LIVER TRANSPLANTATION》

Long-term biological consequences of donor right hepatectomy including the middle hepatic vein in adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation.

The right lobe liver graft has become the workhorse of adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation. Donor right hepatectomy is feasible only because of the immense regenerative ability of the liver. The long-term biological consequences of this very major donor procedure on the donor however are unknown. Twenty-nine donors of this procedure in our centre, all of whom included the middle hepatic vein, were studied. On long-term follow-up at a median of 47.4 months, there was a discernible but statistically insignificant decrease in size of the regenerated left lobe compared to the original whole liver volume. There was paradoxically a trend of incompleteness of regeneration in relation to the original liver volume for those with a larger remnant left lobe. The volume ratio of the regenerated left lobe to the original left lobe before hepatectomy was inversely proportional to the left lobe proportion preoperatively. This strong but inverse linear correlation reflected the good regenerative ability of the remnant left lobe. None of the donors developed thrombocytopenia. Although demonstrable decrease in white cell count, increase in serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and creatinine did occur, the changes remained within normal limits and were of yet uncertain clinical significance. In conclusion, donor right hepatectomy including the middle hepatic vein is biologically acceptable to the live donor.

Chan SC ，Lo CM ，Wong Y ，Liu CL ，Fan ST ... -  《LIVER TRANSPLANTATION》

Adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe.

Kim SJ ，Kim DG ，Chung ES ，Lee YJ ，Moon IS ，Lee MD ... -  《TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS》

Surgery-related morbidity in living donors of right-lobe liver graft: lessons from the first 200 cases.

Ito T ，Kiuchi T ，Egawa H ，Kaihara S ，Oike F ，Ogura Y ，Fujimoto Y ，Ogawa K ，Tanaka K ... -  《TRANSPLANTATION》

Utilization of elderly donors in living donor liver transplantation: when more is less?

An accepted definition of donor exclusion criteria has not been established for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The use of elderly donors to expand the living donor pool raises ethical concerns about donor safety. The aims of this study were (1) the comparison of the postoperative outcomes of living liver donors by age (≥ 50 versus < 50 years) and (2) the evaluation of the impact of the extent of right hepatectomy on donor outcomes. The study group included 150 donors who underwent donor right hepatectomy between October 2004 and April 2009. Extended criteria surgery (ECS) was defined as right hepatectomy with middle hepatic vein (MHV) harvesting or right hepatectomy resulting in an estimated remnant liver volume (RLV) less than 35%. The primary endpoints were donor outcomes in terms of donor complications graded according to the Clavien classification. Group 1 consisted of donors who were 50 years old or older (n = 28), and group 2 consisted of donors who were less than 50 years old (n = 122). At least 1 ECS criterion was present in 74% of donors: 57% had 1 criterion, and 17% had 2 criteria. None of the donors had grade 4 complications or died. The overall and major complication rates were similar in the 2 donor age groups [28.6% and 14.3% in group 1 and 32% and 8.2% in group 2 for the overall complication rates (P = 0.8) and the major complication rates (P = 0.2), respectively]. However, there was a significant correlation between the rate of major complications and the type of surgery in donors who were 50 years old or older. In LDLT, extending the limits of surgery comes at the price of more complications in elderly donors. Right hepatectomy with MHV harvesting and any procedure causing an RLV less than 35% should be avoided in living liver donors who are 50 years old or older.

Dayangac M ，Taner CB ，Yaprak O ，Demirbas T ，Balci D ，Duran C ，Yuzer Y ，Tokat Y ... -  《-》