Intelligence and psychosocial functioning during long-term growth hormone therapy in children born small for gestational age.

van Pareren YK ，Duivenvoorden HJ ，Slijper FS ，Koot HM ，Hokken-Koelega AC ... -  《JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM》

Effects of growth hormone treatment on cognitive function and head circumference in children born small for gestational age.

Short stature is not the only problem faced by children born small for gestational age (SGA). Being born SGA has also been associated with lowered intelligence, poor academic performance, low social competence and behavioural problems. This paper summarizes the results of a randomized, double-blind, growth hormone (GH) dose-response study (1 or 2 mg/m2/day [ approximately 0.035 or 0.07 mg/kg/day]) on growth, intelligence quotient (IQ) and psychosocial functioning in 79 children born SGA at the start, and after 2 and 8 years of GH therapy, and addresses the associations with head circumference. Mean age at start of therapy was 7.4 years; mean duration of GH treatment was 8.0 years. In 2001, 91% of children born SGA had reached a normal height (> -2.0 standard deviation score [SDS]). Block-design s-score (Performal IQ) and Total IQ score increased (p < 0.001 for both indices) from scores significantly lower than those of Dutch peers at the start of therapy (p < 0.001) to scores that were comparable to those of Dutch peers in 2001. Vocabulary s-score (Verbal IQ) was normal at the start of therapy and remained so over time. Externalizing Problem Behaviour SDS and Total Problem Behaviour SDS improved during GH therapy (p < 0.01-0.05) to scores comparable to those of Dutch peers. Internalizing Problem Behaviour SDS was comparable to that of Dutch peers at the start of therapy and remained so, whereas Self-Perception improved from the start of GH therapy until 2001 (p < 0.001), when it reached normal scores. Head circumference SDS at the start of GH therapy and head growth during GH therapy were positively related to all IQ scores (p < 0.01), whereas neither were related to height SDS at the start of, or to its improvement during, GH therapy. A significant improvement in height and head circumference in children born SGA was seen after only 3 years of GH therapy, in contrast to randomized SGA controls. In conclusion, most children born SGA showed a normalization of height during GH therapy and, in parallel to this, a significant improvement in Performal IQ and Total IQ. In addition, problem behaviour and self-perception improved significantly. Interestingly, Performal, Verbal and Total IQ scores were positively related to head circumference, both at the start of, and during, GH therapy; head circumference increased in GH-treated children born SGA, but not in untreated SGA controls. These results are encouraging but also warrant confirmational studies and further investigations into the effects of GH on the central nervous system.

Hokken-Koelega A ，van Pareren Y ，Arends N 《hormone research》

Early, discontinuous, high dose growth hormone treatment to normalize height and weight of short children born small for gestational age: results over 6 years.

Most children born small for gestational age (SGA) normalize their size through spontaneous catch-up growth within the first 2 yr after birth. Some SGA children fail to do so and maintain an abnormally short stature throughout childhood. We have previously reported that high dose GH treatment (66 or 100 microg/kg x day s.c. over 2 yr; age at start, 2-8 yr; n = 38) induces pronounced catch-up growth in short children born SGA, thereby normalizing their height and weight in childhood. Here, we report on the further prepubertal growth course of these children over the first 4 yr after withdrawal of early, high dose GH treatment. Of the 38 treated children, none developed precocious puberty, and 22 remained prepubertal. Mean age of the latter at start of GH was 4.4 yr, height was -3.7 SD score, and height after adjustment for midparental height was -2.9 SD score. Height increased by an average of 2.5 SD during the 2 yr of GH treatment and decreased by 0.4 and 0.3 SD, respectively, during the first and second year after GH withdrawal. Subsequently, when stature was not extremely short at the start (mean adjusted height SD score, -2.7; n = 13), no further GH treatment was given, and the adjusted height was stabilized around -1.0 SD score; when stature was very short at the start (mean adjusted height, -3.3 SD score; n = 9), a second course of GH treatment (66 microg/kg x day s.c.) was initiated either 2 yr (n = 5) or 3 yr (n = 4) after initial GH withdrawal. This second course was associated with renewed catch-up growth and also resulted in a mean adjusted height of -1.0 SD score. In each subgroup, the pattern of the weight course paralleled that of the height course; GH treatment was well tolerated. In conclusion, early, discontinuous, high dose GH treatment appears to be a safe and efficient option to normalize prepubertal height and weight in the majority of short SGA children. It remains to be examined whether the normalized stature will be maintained during pubertal development, either with or without further GH treatment.

de Zegher F ，Du Caju MV ，Heinrichs C ，Maes M ，De Schepper J ，Craen M ，Vanweser K ，Malvaux P ，Rosenfeld RG ... -  《JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM》

Adult height after long-term, continuous growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children born small for gestational age: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-response GH trial.

The GH dose-response effect of long-term continuous GH treatment on adult height (AH) was evaluated in 54 short children born small for gestational age (SGA) who were participating in a randomized, double-blind, dose-response trial. Patients were randomly and blindly assigned to treatment with either 3 IU (group A) or 6 IU (group B) GH/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 or 0.067 mg/kg.d, respectively). The mean (+/-SD) birth length was -3.6 (1.4), the age at the start of the study was 8.1 (1.9) yr, and the height SD score (SDS) at the start of the study -3.0 (0.7). Seventeen of the 54 children were partially GH deficient (stimulated GH peak, 10-20 mU/liter). Fifteen non-GH-treated, non-GH-deficient, short children born SGA, with similar inclusion criteria, served as controls [mean (+/-SD) birth length, -3.3 (1.2); age at start, 7.8 (1.7) yr; height SDS at start, -2.6 (0.5)]. GH treatment resulted in an AH above -2 SDS in 85% of the children after a mean (+/-SD) GH treatment period of 7.8 (1.7) yr. The mean (SD) AH SDS was -1.1 (0.7) for group A and -0.9 (0.8) for group B, resulting from a mean (+/-SD) gain in height SDS of 1.8 (0.7) for group A and 2.1 (0.8) for group B. No significant differences between groups A and B were found for AH SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.2, 0.6; P > 0.2) and gain in height SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.1, 0.7; P > 0.1). When corrected for target height, the mean corrected AH SDS was -0.2 (0.8) for group A and -0.4 (0.9) for group B. The mean (+/-SD) AH SDS of the control group [-2.3 (0.7)] was significantly lower than that of the GH-treated group (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated the following predictive variables for AH SDS: target height SDS, height SDS, and chronological age minus bone age (years) at the start of the study. GH dose had no significant effect. In conclusion, long-term continuous GH treatment in short children born SGA without signs of persistent catch-up growth leads to a normalization of AH, even with a GH dose of 3 IU/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 mg/kg.d).

Van Pareren Y ，Mulder P ，Houdijk M ，Jansen M ，Reeser M ，Hokken-Koelega A ... -  《JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM》

Body composition, blood pressure, and lipid metabolism before and during long-term growth hormone (GH) treatment in children with short stature born small for gestational age either with or without GH deficiency.

To assess the effects of long-term continuous GH treatment on body composition, blood pressure (BP), and lipid metabolism in children with short stature born small for gestational age (SGA), body mass index (BMI), skinfold thickness measurements, systemic BP measurements, and levels of blood lipids were evaluated in 79 children with a baseline age of 3-11 yr with short stature (height SD-score, < -1.88) born SGA (birth length SD-score, < -1.88). Twenty-two of the 79 children were GH deficient (GHD). All children participated in a randomized, double-blind, dose-response multicenter GH trial. Four- and 6-yr data were compared between two GH dosage groups (3 vs. 6 IU/m2 body surface/day). Untreated children with short stature born SGA are lean (mean BMI SD-score, -1.3; mean SD-score skinfolds, -0.8), have a higher systolic BP (SD-score, 0.7) but normal diastolic BP (SD-score, -0.1), and normal lipids (total cholesterol, 4.7 mmol/L; low-density lipoprotein, 2.9 mmol/L; high-density lipoprotein, 1.3 mmol/L) compared with healthy peers. During long-term continuous GH treatment, the BMI normalized without overall changes in sc fat compared with age-matched references, whereas the BP SD-score and the atherogenic index decreased significantly. Although the mean 6-yr increase in height SD-score was significantly higher in the children receiving GH treatment with 6 IU/m2 x day (2.7) than in those receiving treatment with 3 IU/m2 day (2.2), no differences in the changes in BMI, skinfold measurements, BP, and lipids were found between the GH dosage groups. The pretreatment SD-scores for BMI, skinfold, and BP, as well as the lipid levels, were not significantly different between GHD and non-GHD children, but after 6 yr of GH treatment the skinfold SD-score and BP SD-score had decreased significantly more in the GHD than in the non-GHD children. Our data indicate that GH treatment has at least up to 6 yr positive instead of negative effects on body composition, BP, and lipid metabolism. In view of the reported higher risk of cardiovascular diseases in later life in children born SGA, further research into adulthood remains warranted.

Sas T ，Mulder P ，Hokken-Koelega A 《JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM》