Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment program in Oregon nursing facilities: beyond resuscitation status.

Program was designed to communicate resident/surrogate treatment preferences in the form of medical orders. To assess statewide nursing facility use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) and to identify the patterns of orders documented on residents' POLST forms. Telephone survey; on-site POLST form review. Oregon nursing facilities. One hundred forty-six nursing facilities in the telephone survey; 356 nursing facility residents aged 65 and older at seven nursing facilities in the POLST form review. A telephone survey; onsite POLST form reviews. In the telephone survey, 71% of facilities reported using the POLST program for at least half of their residents. In the POLST form review, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders were present on 88% of POLST forms. On forms indicating DNR, 77% reflected preferences for more than the lowest level of treatment in at least one other category. On POLST forms indicating orders to resuscitate, 47% reflected preferences for less than the highest level of treatment in at least one other category. The oldest old (> or = 85, n=167) were more likely than the young old (65-74, n=48) to have orders to limit resuscitation, medical treatment, and artificial nutrition and hydration. The POLST program is widely used in Oregon nursing facilities. A majority of individuals with DNR orders requested some other form of life-extending treatment, and advanced age was associated with orders to limit treatments.

Hickman SE ，Tolle SW ，Brummel-Smith K ，Carley MM ... -  《JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY》

The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment program: Oregon emergency medical technicians' practical experiences and attitudes.

To evaluate emergency medical technicians' (EMTs) experiences with the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) program and learn about attitudes regarding its effectiveness. Anonymous survey mailed to a stratified random sample. Tri-County Portland, Oregon, area. A total of 572 Oregon EMT respondents (out of 1,048 surveys) were included in the analysis. Survey questions about experiences with the POLST form and opinions about POLST. Respondents were mostly male (76%) and paramedics (66%). Most respondents (73%) had treated a patient with a POLST, and 74% reported receiving education about POLST. EMTs reported that POLST, when present, changed treatment in 45% of cases. Seventy-five percent of the respondents agreed that the POLST form provides clear instructions about patient preferences, and 93% agreed that the POLST form is useful in determining which treatments to provide when the patient is in cardiopulmonary arrest. Fewer (63%) agreed that the form is useful in determining treatments when the patient has a pulse and is breathing. Most respondents have experience with the POLST program. EMTs find the POLST form useful and often use it to change treatment decisions for patients.

Schmidt TA ，Hickman SE ，Tolle SW ，Brooks HS ... -  《JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY》

A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment.

Tolle SW ，Tilden VP ，Nelson CA ，Dunn PM ... -  《JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY》

Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): lessons learned from analysis of the Oregon POLST Registry.

Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) has become a common means of documenting patient treatment preferences. In addition to orders either for Attempt Resuscitation or Do Not Attempt Resuscitation, for patients not in cardiopulmonary arrest, POLST provides three levels of treatment: Full Treatment, Limited Interventions, and Comfort Measures Only. Oregon has an electronic registry for POLST forms completed in the state. We used registry data to examine the different combinations of treatment orders. We analyzed data from forms signed and entered into the Oregon POLST Registry in 2012. The analysis included 31,294 POLST forms. The mean Registrant age was 76.7 years. 21,396 (68.4%) had Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR) orders and 9900 (31.6%) had orders for "Attempt Resuscitation". The 6 order combinations were: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/Comfort Measures Only 10,769 (34.4%), DNR/Limited Interventions 9306 (29.7%), DNR/Full Treatment 1211 (3.9%), Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)/Comfort Measures Only 11 (0.04%), Attempt CPR/Limited Interventions 2281 (7.3%), and Attempt CPR/Full Treatment 7473 (23.9%). The most common order combinations were DNR/Comfort Measures Only, DNR/Limited Interventions and Attempt Resuscitation/Full Treatment. These three makes sense to health professionals. However, other order combinations that require interpretation at the time of a crisis were completed for about 10% of Registrants. These combinations need further investigation.

Schmidt TA ，Zive D ，Fromme EK ，Cook JN ，Tolle SW ... -  《-》

Nursing Home Residents' Preferences on Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment.

Previous studies examining preferences documented in Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) have found that most sampled POLSTs show a preference to limit care. These studies were conducted in states that are relatively ethnically homogeneous. This study investigated the POLST preferences of nursing home residents in an ethnically diverse state-California-that requires nursing homes to document whether residents execute POLST. Data were collected from POLST forms executed by 941 residents in a convenience sample of 13 nursing homes in Southern California. The study analyzed data from 4 POLST form items: signatory (resident vs. surrogate decision-maker) and care preferences related to: (a) resuscitation; (b) medical intervention; and (c) artificially administered nutrition. Descriptive, comparative, and regression analyses are reported at both individual and facility levels. Of reviewed POLSTs, 46.8% documented a preference for "do not resuscitate" (DNR); 47.3% documented limits on medical intervention; and 52% documented limits on artificially administered nutrition. Residents in nursing homes serving comparatively larger populations of older residents and White residents had lower odds of electing the full care option for each of the POLST's 3 care items; those in nursing homes serving comparatively larger populations of Hispanic residents had higher odds of electing long-term artificially administered nutrition. This study found lower rates of POLST choices limiting care than previous studies, possibly because the sampled nursing homes served a more ethnically- and age-diverse population. California's requirement that nursing homes document whether residents execute POLST also may have indirectly influenced choice patterns.

Rahman AN ，Bressette M ，Gassoumis ZD ，Enguidanos S ... -  《-》