Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone catheter ablation, the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan (SV) versus ACE inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) in preventing AF recurrence remains unclear. The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine whether SV offers superior outcomes in this clinical setting. This study systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched cohorts (PMC), evaluating SV's efficacy in preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence and structural remodeling assessed via left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial volume index (LAVi), with statistical analyses performed using Review Manager 5.1.7 and heterogeneity assessed via I2 statistics. The analysis comprised 642 patients from three RCTs and one PMC (319 SV-treated). SV significantly reduced AF recurrence [risk ratios (RR) 0.54; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.41-0.70; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%), a trend also observed when considering RCTs exclusively (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41-0.84; p = 0.004; I2 = 0%). Moreover, SV demonstrated a notable reduction in LAVi [mean deviation (MD) -5.34 mL/m2; 95% CI -8.77 to -1.91; p = 0.002; I2 = 57%] compared with ARB, alongside a significant improvement in LVEF (MD 1.83%; 95% CI 1.35-2.32; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses among patients with hypertension and LVEF < 50% also indicated lower AF recurrence with SV. SV therapy exhibited superior efficacy in reducing AF recurrence compared with ACEi or ARB and demonstrated superior outcomes in attenuating atrial structural remodeling after catheter ablation. These findings underscore the potential of SV as a therapeutic option for patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation, highlighting its efficacy in mitigating AF recurrence and structural remodeling. PROSPERO identifier number CRD42024497958.

被引量：- 发表：1970

A Clinicians Guide to Recommending Common Cholesterol-Lowering Dietary Supplements.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism using Real-World Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown comparable efficacy and a superior safety profile in clinical trials for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, further study is needed to assess DOACs' effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin in a real-world context. Thus, this meta-analysis compares the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with VTE. A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from inception until June 2024. We examined observational studies that compared safety and effectiveness between DOACs and warfarin when used in treating VTE and reported adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and/or odds ratios (ORs) for recurrent VTE, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and death from any cause. We then estimated the pooled effect using the random-effects model for meta-analysis. A total of 25 studies were included in the current meta-analysis. DOAC therapy was associated with significantly lower risks of recurrent VTE (HR 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.85), major bleeding (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.83), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83) compared to warfarin. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality between the two groups (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.10). This meta-analysis found that DOACs are associated with a significant reduction in VTE recurrence in addition to the known favorable safety profile when compared to warfarin.

被引量：- 发表：1970

SGLT2 Inhibitors and How They Work Beyond the Glucosuric Effect. State of the Art.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a heightened risk of cardiovascular and renal complications. While glycemic control remains essential, newer therapeutic options, such as SGLT2 inhibitors, offer additional benefits beyond glucose reduction. This review delves into the mechanisms underlying the cardio-renal protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. By inducing relative hypoglycemia, these agents promote ketogenesis, optimize myocardial energy metabolism, and reduce lipotoxicity. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors exert renoprotective actions by enhancing renal perfusion, attenuating inflammation, and improving iron metabolism. These pleiotropic effects, including modulation of blood pressure, reduction of uric acid, and improved endothelial function, collectively contribute to the cardiovascular and renal benefits observed with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy. This review will provide clinicians with essential knowledge, understanding, and a clear recollection of this pharmacological group's mechanism of action.

被引量：- 发表：1970

A Real‑World Pharmacovigilance Study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for Mavacamten.

Mavacamten is a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This pharmacovigilance study aimed to assess mavacamten-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the real world as reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). We conducted disproportionality analyses with four signal detection algorithms-reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker to identify mavacamten-related ADRs. Out of 4,500,131 reports from the FAERS database, 1004 mavacamten-related ADRs were identified from 1 January 2022 to 30 September 2023. A total of 26 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) conforming to the four signal detection algorithms were noted. Some of the statistically significant cardiac ADRs at PT level include decreased ejection fraction (EF) [ROR 33.60 (95% confidence interval, CI 21.79-51.82), PRR 32.86 (χ2 615.96), information component (IC) 5.03, IC025 4.61, empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) 32.77, EBGM05 21.25], cardiac failure [ROR 9.39 (95% CI 6.49-13.60), PRR 9.13 (χ2 202.42), IC 3.19, IC025 2.83, EBGM 9.12, EBGM05 6.30], and atrial fibrillation [ROR 16.63 (95% CI 12.72-21.75), PRR 15.66 (χ2 769.93), IC 3.97, IC025 3.71, EBGM 15.64, EBGM05 11.96]. The results of our study were consistent with the safety data of clinical trials, including reduced ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, dyspnea, and syncope. We also found potential new and unexpected ADR signals, such as urinary tract infection, gout, and peripheral edema.

被引量：- 发表：1970