Evaluating anchor variables and variation in meaningful score differences for PROMIS(®) Pediatric measures in children and adolescents living with a rheumatic disease.

Meaningful score differences (MSDs), as defined by recent FDA guidance, can improve the interpretation of outcome measure scores and score changes. Well-accepted methods for estimating MSDs typically rely on external anchor variables, but the applications of these methods are limited in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases. This project explored multiple candidate anchors for the PROMIS® Pediatric measures of Physical Activity, Fatigue, Pain Interference, and Mobility for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Longitudinal data were extracted from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. Candidate anchors included patient-reported domain-specific global impressions of change (GIC) along with other parent- and clinician-reported variables. Prior to MSD estimation, the quality of the anchors was assessed using a priori criteria (correlation ≥0.30, n≥10, <10% missing). Anchors meeting criteria were used to calculate MSDs. Among 289 children with JIA and 47 with SLE, the GIC did not meet criteria inhalf of the scenarios. Other candidate anchors performed slightly better. The calculated MSDs varied by external anchor across measures, diagnoses, and direction of change (better vs worse). Many of the candidate external anchoring variables did not meet pre-specified criteria for calculating MSDs. Even for those that did, the choice of anchoring variable had a strong impact on the estimated MSD value and were different from other published values. As in adults, establishing pediatric MSDs requires selection of high-quality anchors, as changes in the variables used as anchors can impact MSD values and any subsequent score interpretations.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Exploration of the association between new "Life's Essential 8" with hyperuricemia and gout among US adults.

Previous researches have reported the relationship between uric acid and cardiovascular disease. We aimed to investigate the association of Life's Essential 8, a recently updated measurement of cardiovascular health, with the prevalence of hyperuricemia (HUA) and gout among US adults. Additionally, we also explored the relationship between LE8 and all-cause mortality among patients with HUA or gout. Participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2007-2016 were involved in this study. LE8 score was categorized into low, moderate, high CVH groups according to American Heart Association definitions. Multivariable logistic regression and cox regression analyses, restricted cubic spline models, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the associations. A total of 23,619 adult participants were included in this study, which included 4,775 hyperuricemia patients and 1,055 gout patients. Among all participants, the overall median LE8 score was 65.62 (21.25) and the prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout of were 20.2% and 4.5%, respectively. After fully adjusted the potential confounders, participants in high CVH group had a lower prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout compared with the low CVH group, with a OR (95%CI) of 0.50 (0.39-0.63) and 0.50 (0.30-0.82), respectively. The restricted cubic spline showed a significantly inverse relationship between LE8 and hyperuricemia and gout. Similar patterns were also identified in the association between LE8 scores and all-cause mortality in HUA and gout patients. Higher LE8 scores are associated with lower risk and lower all-cause mortality of HUA and gout among US adults. Adherence to optimal CVH metrics may be an appropriate prevention and management strategy for reducing the socioeconomic burden of hyperuricemia and gout.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Moving beyond barriers: a mixed-method study to develop evidence-based strategies to improve implementation of PROMs in clinical oncology care.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Chinese utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument QLU-C10D.

The aim of this study is to provide Chinese utility weights for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 Dimensions (EORTC QLU-C10D) which is a preference-based cancer-specific utility instrument derived from the EORTC QLQ-C30. We conducted an online survey of the general population in China, with quota sampling for age and gender. Each respondent was asked to complete a discrete choice experimental survey consisting of 16 randomly selected choice sets. The conditional logit model and mixed logit model were used to analyze respondents' preferences, and the goodness of fit of the model was tested. A total of 2003 respondents were included in the analysis. Utility decrements within dimensions were typically monotonic. Monotonic inconsistency issues in the Fatigue, Sleep, and Nausea dimensions were normalized by monotonicity correction. Physical functioning, Pain, and Role functioning were associated with the greatest utility weights, with the smallest decrements being in Bowel problems and Emotional functioning. The utility value for the worst health state was 0.083, i.e. slightly higher than being dead. This study provides the first China-specific set of value for the QLU-C10D based on societal preferences of the Chinese adult general population. The value set can be used as a cancer-specific scoring system for economic evaluations of new oncology therapies and technologies in China.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Correction: Development of algorithms for estimating the Child Health Utility 9D from Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities.

被引量：- 发表：1970