JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS
动物育种与遗传学杂志
ISSN: 0931-2668
自引率: 10.6%
发文量: 19
被引量: 2238
影响因子: 3.268
通过率: 暂无数据
出版周期: 双月刊
审稿周期: 暂无数据
审稿费用: 0
版面费用: 暂无数据
年文章数: 84
国人发稿量: 2

投稿须知/期刊简介:

The journal publishes original articles by international authorities on the progress of research in animal production, quantitative genetics, biology, and evolution of domestic animals. The reports are of interest to researchers, teachers, and the animal-breeding industry. Articles are published in German, English, and French, with summaries in English and German. Book reviews appear in many issues. Approximately 90 % of all contributions are in English.A supplemental series and #187;Advances in Animal Breeding and Genetics / Fortschritte in der Tierzüchtung und ZüchtungsbiologieFehler! Verweisquelle konnte nicht gefunden werden.

最新论文
  • Correction to: Rahbar et al., 2023. Defining desired genetic gains for Pacific white shrimp (Litopeneaus vannamei) breeding objectives using participatory approaches. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 2024;141:390-402.

    被引量:- 发表:1970

  • Integrating large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies improve the genomic prediction accuracy for combined pig populations.

    The strategy of combining reference populations has been widely recognized as an effective way to enhance the accuracy of genomic prediction (GP). This study investigated the efficiency of genomic prediction using prior information and combined reference population. In total, prior information considering trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) obtained from meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS meta-analysis) was incorporated into three models to assess the performance of GP using combined reference populations. Two different Yorkshire populations with imputed whole genome sequence (WGS) data (9,741,620 SNPs), named as P1 (1259 individuals) and P2 (1018 individuals), were used to predict genomic estimated breeding values for three live carcass traits, including backfat thickness, loin muscle area, and loin muscle depth. A 10 × 5 fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the prediction accuracy of 203 randomly selected candidate pigs from the P2 population and the reference population consisted of the remaining pigs from P2 and the stepwise added pigs from P1. By integrating SNPs with different p-value thresholds from GWAS meta-analysis downloaded from PigGTEx Project, the prediction accuracy of GBLUP, genomic feature BLUP (GFBLUP) and GBLUP given genetic architecture (BLUP|GA) were compared. Moreover, we explored effects of reference population size and heritability enrichment of genomic features on the prediction accuracy improvement of GFBLUP and BLUP|GA relative to GBLUP. The prediction accuracy of GBLUP using all WGS markers showed average improvement of 4.380% using the P1 + P2 reference population compared with the P2 reference population. Using the combined reference population, GFBLUP and BLUP|GA yielded 6.179% and 5.525% higher accuracies than GBLUP using all SNPs based on the single reference population, respectively. Positive regression coefficients were estimated in relation to the improvement in prediction accuracy (between GFBLUP/BLUP|GA and GBLUP) and the size of the reference as well as the heritability enrichment of genomic features. Compared to the classic GBLUP model, GFBLUP and BLUP|GA models integrating GWAS meta-analysis information increase the prediction accuracy and using combined populations with enlarged reference population size further enhances prediction accuracy of the two approaches. The heritability enrichment of genomic features can be used as an indicator to reflect weather prior information is accurately presented.

    被引量:- 发表:1970

  • Causal inference and GWAS: Rubin, Pearl, and Mendelian randomization.

    Although Genome Wide Analysis (GWAS) have been widely used to understand the genetic architecture of complex quantitative traits, interpreting their results in terms of the biological processes that determine those traits has been difficult or even lacking, because of the variability in responses to the tests of hypotheses within a trait, species, and breed or cross, and the lack of follow-up studies. It is then essential employing appropriate statistical tests that point out to the causal genes responsible of the relevant fraction of the genetic variability observed. We briefly review the main theoretical aspects of the two schools of causal inference (Rubin's Causal Model, RCM, and Pearl's causal inference, PCI). RCM approachs the hypothesis testing from a randomization perspective by considering a wider space of the observation, i.e. the "potential outcomes", rather than the narrower space that results from defining "treatment" effects after observing the data. Next, we discuss the assumptions involved to meet the requirements of randomization for RCM with observational data (non-designed experiments) with special emphasis on the Stable Unit Treatment Analysis (SUTVA). Due to the presence of "confounders" (i.e. systematic fixed effects, environmental permanent effects, interaction among genes, etc.), causal average treatment effects are viewed through the familiar lens of normal linear (or mixed) models. To overcome the difficulties of association analyses, a tests of causal effects is introduced using independent predicted residual breeding values from animal models of genetic evaluation that avoids the effects of population structure and confounder effects. An independent section discusses the issue of whether the additive effects defined at the "gene" level by R. A. Fisher and popularized in D. S. Falconer's textbook of quantitative genetics can be termed causal from either RCM or PCI.

    被引量:- 发表:1970

  • Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and production traits in pigs.

    被引量:- 发表:1970

  • Multivariate analysis of herd structure and genetic resource indicators in seedstock beef cattle herds.

    Genetic, environmental, technological and financial resources are used differently in cattle herds that participate in the same breeding programme. The percentages of calves sired by sires within their own herd or from external herds vary across herds, as do the intensities of use of reproductive biotechnologies. These divergences may be related to differences in the indicators of genetic performance for economic traits. The aim of this study was to determine the factors related to herd structure and genetic resource utilization that exert the greatest influence on the genetic merit of seedstock herds within a Nellore breeding programme. The database comprised 21 factors, along with genomic-enhanced expected progeny differences (GE-EPDs) for growth, reproductive and carcass traits, as well as a selection index of animals from 128 herds. By combining principal component analysis and cluster analysis, we were able to group the herds. We identified statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the mean values of the factors, GE-EPDs and genetic trends among the groups of herds. Differences in the percentage of sires from external herds and in sire age between the groups of herds were the factors most associated with differences in mean GE-EPDs and genetic trends. Using young sires from other herds or lineages is an effective strategy in animal breeding. By enhancing genetic variability, this approach does not only improve the genetic quality of herds but also accelerates genetic progress in desired traits over time. Therefore, to ensure the success of this strategy, it is crucial that seedstock herds undergo a thorough selection process aimed at maximizing the genetic potential of future generations of beef cattle.

    被引量:- 发表:1970

统计分析
是否有问题?您可以直接对期刊官方提问 提问

最近浏览

关于我们

zlive学术集成海量学术资源,融合人工智能、深度学习、大数据分析等技术,为科研工作者提供全面快捷的学术服务。在这里我们不忘初心,砥砺前行。

友情链接

联系我们

合作与服务

©2024 zlive学术声明使用前必读