Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence based guideline on neuropathology for WHO grade II diffuse glioma: update.

QUESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PRIOR VERSION OF THESE GUIDELINES WITHOUT CHANGE: TARGET POPULATION: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who have suspected low-grade diffuse glioma. What are the optimal neuropathological techniques to diagnose low-grade diffuse glioma in the adult? Level I Histopathological analysis of a representative surgical sample of the lesion should be used to provide the diagnosis of low-grade diffuse glioma. Level III Both frozen section and cytopathologic/smear evaluation should be used to aid the intra-operative assessment of low-grade diffuse glioma diagnosis. A resection specimen is preferred over a biopsy specimen, to minimize the potential for sampling error issues. Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. In adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is testing for IDH1 mutation (R132H and/or others) warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? Level II IDH gene mutation assessment, via IDH1 R132H antibody and/or IDH1/2 mutation hotspot sequencing, is highly-specific for low-grade diffuse glioma, and is recommended as an additional test for classification and prognosis. Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. In adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is testing for 1p/19q loss warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? Level III 1p/19q loss-of-heterozygosity testing, by FISH, array-CGH or PCR, is recommended as an additional test in oligodendroglial cases for prognosis and potential treatment planning. Patients with histologically proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. In adult patients (age > 18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is methyl-guanine methyl-transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation testing warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? There is insufficient evidence to recommend MGMT promoter methylation testing as a routine for low-grade diffuse gliomas. It is recommended that patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials to assess the value of this and related markers for this target population. Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. In adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with histologically proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is Ki-67/MIB1 immunohistochemistry warranted? If so, is there a preferred method to quantitate results? Level III Ki67/MIB1 immunohistochemistry is recommended as an option for prognostic assessment. TARGET POPULATION: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who have suspected WHO grade II diffuse glioma. Is testing for ATRX mutations helpful for predicting survival and making treatment recommendations? There is insufficient evidence to recommend ATRX mutation testing as a means of predicting survival or making treatment recommendations. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who have suspected WHO grade II diffuse glioma. Does the addition of intraoperative optical histologic methods provide accuracy beyond the use of conventional histologic methods in diagnosis and management? There is insufficient evidence at this time to suggest that intraoperative optical histologic methods offer increased diagnostic accuracy when compared to conventional techniques.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Patterns of failure after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer: outcomes in the immunotherapy era.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is known to have high rates of development of brain metastases. Standard treatment has been whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) but the role for more focused treatment and hippocampal avoidance has arisen in the past decade. In addition, with possible penetration of the central nervous system by more modern immunotherapies, the risk of distant failure may be lower. As such, we reviewed patients at our institution treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to look at patterns, locations, and predictors of failure in the brain. A retrospective review and analysis of charts was done on 46 patients treated with SRS (no history of prior WBRT) for their brain metastases from SCLC. Multivariate analysis was used to determine significant prognostic factors influencing survival and local/distant failure. We tracked timing and type of immunotherapy, if any, as well as if patients failed in the hippocampus or required WBRT. There were 46 patients with 97 total brain metastases treated with SRS in this study. Median number of metastases was 2 (1-5). The median dose of radiation was 20 Gy (20-30) in 3 fractions (1-5) for all 97 tumors. 11 patients did not receive immunotherapy, whereas 35 patients had immunotherapy of some sort. Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 13 months, with a 12 month OS of 59% and 2 year OS of 30%. Cox regression did not reveal any significant predictors of OS, including age, sex, total volume, extracranial disease, KPS, immunotherapy, or number of metastases. 12 month and 24 month local control of disease was 95% and 80%, respectively. There were no significant predictors of local failure including volume, dose, or immunotherapy. 25 of the patients had distant brain failure, with a rate of distant failure of 38% and 64% for 6 and 12 months, respectively. Immunotherapy, number of metastases, total target volume, nor presence of extracranial disease was predictive of distant brain failure. WBRT free survival was also measured and found to be 73% at 1 year. There were no significant predictors for this measure. Lastly, five patients in this cohort showed failure in the hippocampus, where the rate of failure at 6 and 12 months was 16%. Rates of distant brain failure in SCLC patients after SRS remain similar to those of NSCLC patients in the immunotherapy era. We did not show a decrease in distant failure rate based on immunotherapy use. The rate of hippocampal failure was quite low and should provide reassurance that SRS and techniques such as HA-IMRT can be reasonably used in these patients. Ongoing clinical trials will help provide more definitive answers in this arena.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines for the role of chemotherapy in newly diagnosed WHO Grade II diffuse glioma in adults: update.

Questions and recommendations from the prior version of these guidelines without changeTarget populationAdult patients (older than 18 years of age) with newly diagnosed World Health Organization (WHO) Grade II gliomas (Oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma, mixed oligoastrocytoma).QuestionIs there a role for chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy of choice in treatment of patients with newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas?RecommendationLevel III: Chemotherapy is recommended as a treatment option to postpone the use of radiotherapy, to slow tumor growth and to improve progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and clinical symptoms in adult patients with newly diagnosed LGG.QuestionWho are the patients with newly diagnosed LGG that would benefit the most from chemotherapy?RecommendationLevel III: Chemotherapy is recommended as an optional component alone or in combination with radiation as the initial adjuvant therapy for all patients who cannot undergo gross total resection (GTR) of a newly diagnosed LGG. Patients with residual tumor >1 cm on post-operative MRI, presenting diameter of 4 cm or older than 40 years of age should be considered for adjuvant therapy as well.QuestionAre there tumor markers that can predict which patients can benefit the most from initial treatment with chemotherapy?RecommendationLevel III: The addition of chemotherapy to standard RT is recommended in LGG patients that carry IDH mutation. In addition, temozolomide (TMZ) is recommended as a treatment option to slow tumor growth in patients who harbor the 1p/19q co-deletion.QuestionHow soon should the chemotherapy be started once the diagnosis of LGG is confirmed?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to make a definitive recommendation on the timing of starting chemotherapy after surgical/pathological diagnosis of LGG has been made. However, using the 12 weeks mark as the latest timeframe to start adjuvant chemotherapy is suggested. It is recommended that patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials to assess the timing of chemotherapy initiation once diagnosis is confirmed for this target population.QuestionWhat chemotherapeutic agents should be used for treatment of newly diagnosed LGG?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation of one particular regimen. Enrollment of subjects in properly designed trials comparing the efficacy of these or other agents is recommended so as to determine which of these regimens is superior.QuestionWhat is the optimal duration and dosing of chemotherapy as initial treatment for LGG?RecommendationInsufficient evidence exists regarding the duration of any specific cytotoxic drug regimen for treatment of newly diagnosed LGG. Enrollment of subjects in properly designed clinical investigations assessing the optimal duration of this therapy is recommended.QuestionShould chemotherapy be given alone or in conjunction with RT as initial therapy for LGG?RecommendationInsufficient evidence exists to make recommendations in this regard. Hence, enrollment of patients in properly designed clinical trials assessing the difference between chemotherapy alone, RT alone or a combination of them is recommended.QuestionShould chemotherapy be given in addition to other type of adjuvant therapy to patients with newly diagnosed LGG?RecommendationLevel II: It is recommended that chemotherapy be added to the RT in patients with unfavorable LGG to improve their progression free survival.Updated Question and Recommendations from the Prior Version of These GuidelinesQuestionIn adult patients with pathologically confirmed WHO Grade II diffuse glioma does chemotherapy alone, combined with radiation therapy or after radiation therapy compared to radiotherapy alone result in better overall survival, progression free survival, local control, fewer complications, neurocognitive preservation, and quality of life?RecommendationLevel I: It is recommended that chemotherapy (PCV) be added to radiation therapy (RT) in all patients with newly diagnosed high-risk WHO Grade II diffuse glioma (Patients younger than 40 unable to get gross total resection and older than 40 regardless of the degree of resection) to improve their overall survival. It is recommended that chemotherapy be added to radiation therapy in all patients with newly diagnosed high-risk WHO Grade II diffuse glioma to improve overall survival without a decline in neurocognitive function. It is suggested that chemotherapy (temozolomide) be added to RT in all patients with newly diagnosed high-risk WHO Grade II diffuse glioma to improve progression free survival and overall survival. It is suggested that chemotherapy alone should be considered in patients with newly diagnosed WHO Grade II diffuse glioma in cases with 1p/19q co-deletion.New questions and recommendationsTarget populationThese recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with WHO Grade II diffuse glioma.QuestionIn adult patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade II diffuse glioma does administration of chemotherapy prior to surgical resection improve extent of resection, provide longer progression free survival and overall survival when compared to chemotherapy alone?RecommendationLevel III: Neo-adjuvant temozolomide may be used in patients with WHO Grade II diffuse gliomas deemed unsafe for resection due to infiltration of eloquent areas or with large contralateral extension as an initial step to improve the extent of resection.There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding the ability of chemotherapy provided prior to surgical resection to improve progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).QuestionIn adult patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade II diffuse glioma does the administration of temozolomide increase the rate of malignant transformation when compared to no chemotherapy or other chemotherapy regimens?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation against the use of temozolomide for WHO Grade II diffuse gliomas due to concern over increasing the rate of malignant transformation.QuestionIn adult patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade II diffuse glioma does administration of multi-agent chemotherapy improve progression free survival and overall survival when compared to administration of single-agent chemotherapy?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation for or against the use of multi-agent chemotherapy to improve progression free survival and overall survival when compared to administration of single-agent chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed WHO Grade II diffuse glioma.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence‑based guidelines on the management of recurrent diffuse low-grade glioma: update.

Target population These recommendations apply to adult patients with recurrent WHO grade 2 infiltrative diffuse glioma (oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma).Questions and Recommendations:Imaging Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, do advanced imaging techniques using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, perfusion weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging or PET provide superior assessment of tumor recurrence and histologic progression compared to standard MRI neuroimaging?Recommendation Level III: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, advanced imaging techniques using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, perfusion weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging or PET are suggested for identification of tumor recurrence or histologic progression.Pathology Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, is molecular testing for IDH-1, IDH-2, and TP53 Mutations and MGMT promotor methylation mutation warranted for predicting survival and formulating treatment recommendations?Recommendation Level III: It is suggested that IDH mutation status be determined for diagnostic purposes. TP53 mutations occur early in WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma pathogenesis, remain stable, and are not suggested as a marker of predisposition to malignant transformation at recurrence or other measures of prognosis. Assessment of MGMT status is suggested as an adjunct to assessing prognosis. Assessment of CDK2NA status is suggested since this is associated with malignant progression of WHO grade 2 diffuse gliomas.Q2: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO Grade 2 diffuse glioma, is testing of proliferation indices (MIB-1 and/or BUdR) warranted for predicting survival and formulating treatment recommendations?Recommendation Level III: It is suggested that proliferative indices (MIB-1 or BUdR) be measured in WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma as higher proliferation indices are associated with increased likelihood of recurrence and shorter progression free and overall survival.Chemotherapy Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, does addition of temozolomide (TMZ), other cytotoxic agents or targeted agents to their treatment regimen improve PFS and/or OS?Recommendation Level III: Temozolomide is suggested in the therapy of recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma as it may improve clinical symptoms. PCV is suggested in the therapy of WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma at recurrence as it may improve clinical symptoms with the strongest evidence being for oligodendrogliomas. TMZ is suggested as the initial choice for recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma. Carboplatin is not suggested as there is no significant benefit from carboplatin as single agent therapy for recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse gliomas. There is insufficient evidence to make any recommendations regarding other agents in the management of recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma.Radiotherapy Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, does addition of radiotherapy to treatment regimen improve PFS and/or OS?Recommendation Level III: Radiation is suggested at recurrence if there was no previous radiation treatment. Q2: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma after previous radiotherapy, does addition of re-irradiation or proton therapy to the treatment regimen improve PFS and/or OS?Recommendation Level III: It is suggested that re-irradiation be considered in the setting of WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma recurrence as it may provide benefit in PFS and OS.Surgery Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, does surgical resection improve PFS and/or OS?. There is insufficient evidence to make any new specific recommendations regarding the value of surgery or extent of resection in relationship to survival for recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma.

被引量：- 发表：1970

Correction to: Development of a scoring system to predict local recurrence in brain metastases following complete resection and observation.

被引量：- 发表：1970